Org Standards

Propagate Standards Across Repos

Scan all repos in a GitHub org (or local org folder) for standards drift, then apply fixes. Two-phase approach: update the .github shared repo first, then propagate to individual repos. Run from ~/code/{org}/ or pass the org name as an argument.

Accounts

Read bot_account, owner_account from the org's CLAUDE.md ## Automation config table.

Helper script

A pre-built script at ~/.claude/scripts/org-standards.sh collects config file presence across all repos in one pass. Run it first to avoid spending tokens checking files individually.

~/.claude/scripts/org-standards.sh <org-name> > /tmp/org-standards.json

If the script is missing or not executable, run /setup-scripts to regenerate it.

The script outputs a JSON object with:

• org, gh_org
• dot_github: shared .github repo info (shared_workflows, shared_templates, has_taskfile)
• declined: previously declined suggestions (from CLAUDE.md ## Declined standards)
• open_standards_prs: open PRs on the .github repo from bot
• repos: array of per-repo entries with config booleans, ci_files, uses_shared_workflows, taskfile, badge_count

Declined suggestions tracking

The org's CLAUDE.md has a ## Declined standards section listing suggestions that were previously rejected. Never re-suggest anything listed there. Format for declined entries:

## Declined standards

- `pre-commit-config`: Not using pre-commit in this org (2025-01-15)
- `pkgdown/baselinenowcast`: Custom docs setup preferred (2025-02-01)

When a suggestion is declined (by 👎 on the PR, or explicit rejection):

1. Add it to ## Declined standards with the date and reason
2. Close the PR if one exists

What to check

Pick the most complete repo in the org as the reference, then compare others against it.

Code quality

• Linting config (.lintr, .JuliaFormatter.toml)
• Pre-commit config (.pre-commit-config.yaml)
• Formatting consistency

Project config

• CI workflow patterns (.github/workflows/)
• CITATION.cff presence and format
• CLAUDE.md presence
• LICENSE consistency
• .gitignore patterns
• Taskfile.yml presence

Documentation

• README structure and badges
• NEWS.md / CHANGELOG format
• pkgdown / Documenter config

Phase 1: Analyse script output

From the JSON, identify:

1. What shared configs exist in the .github repo
2. Which shared workflows repos are already using
3. What the most complete repo looks like as a reference
4. What has been declined before (skip those)
5. Whether there are open standards PRs still waiting for review

If there are open standards PRs: report their status and do not duplicate their changes.

Phase 2: Update .github repo first

Before touching individual repos, ensure shared configs are up to date in the .github repo. This means shared workflows, templates, and Taskfile.yml live centrally.

Things that belong in .github:

• Reusable CI workflows (.github/workflows/)
• Issue and PR templates
• CONTRIBUTING.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, STYLE_GUIDE.md
• Shared Taskfile.yml (if the org uses Task)

For each missing shared config:

1. Create a worktree branch in the .github repo
2. Add the shared config
3. Create a PR
4. Stop here for this item — do not propagate to repos until the PR is merged

Phase 3: Report per-repo drift

Present a table of repos vs standards, showing what needs updating. Group by priority:

• Missing entirely (e.g. no .pre-commit-config.yaml)
• Could use shared workflow (local workflow duplicates a shared one)
• Outdated (e.g. old CI workflow version)
• Minor drift (e.g. slightly different .gitignore)

Exclude anything in the declined list. Exclude anything covered by an open, unmerged .github PR.

Phase 4: Apply per-repo fixes (with confirmation)

Ask the user which fixes to apply. For each fix:

1. Create a worktree branch in the target repo
2. Apply the change
3. Where possible, reference a shared workflow instead of duplicating config
4. Run linting if applicable
5. Commit and push
6. Create a PR

For bot/owner-owned repos: apply directly with a clear commit message. For repos owned by others: open a PR making it clear the suggestions are optional.

Phase 5: Team mode

If more than 3 repos need fixes, spawn a team. Each teammate handles one repo's fixes as a worktree PR. The lead coordinates and reports results.

Phase 6: Handle responses on previous PRs

Check for reactions/comments on previously opened standards PRs:

• Merged or 👍: mark as accepted, update the repo's entry
• Closed or 👎: add to ## Declined standards in CLAUDE.md with date and reason

# Check PR status
gh pr view <number> -R <org>/<repo> --json state,reviews

Auto-Exit When Standalone

IMPORTANT: If this command is being run as a standalone request, automatically exit after completing all phases successfully.