Performance Profiler
Tier: POWERFUL
Category: Engineering
Domain: Performance Engineering
Overview
Systematic performance profiling for Node.js, Python, and Go applications. Identifies CPU, memory, and I/O bottlenecks; generates flamegraphs; analyzes bundle sizes; optimizes database queries; detects memory leaks; and runs load tests with k6 and Artillery. Always measures before and after.
Core Capabilities
- CPU profiling — flamegraphs for Node.js, py-spy for Python, pprof for Go
- Memory profiling — heap snapshots, leak detection, GC pressure
- Bundle analysis — webpack-bundle-analyzer, Next.js bundle analyzer
- Database optimization — EXPLAIN ANALYZE, slow query log, N+1 detection
- Load testing — k6 scripts, Artillery scenarios, ramp-up patterns
- Before/after measurement — establish baseline, profile, optimize, verify
When to Use
- App is slow and you don't know where the bottleneck is
- P99 latency exceeds SLA before a release
- Memory usage grows over time (suspected leak)
- Bundle size increased after adding dependencies
- Preparing for a traffic spike (load test before launch)
- Database queries taking >100ms
Golden Rule: Measure First
# Establish baseline BEFORE any optimization
# Record: P50, P95, P99 latency | RPS | error rate | memory usage
# Wrong: "I think the N+1 query is slow, let me fix it"
# Right: Profile → confirm bottleneck → fix → measure again → verify improvement
Node.js Profiling
CPU Flamegraph
# Method 1: clinic.js (best for development)
npm install -g clinic
# CPU flamegraph
clinic flame -- node dist/server.js
# Heap profiler
clinic heapprofiler -- node dist/server.js
# Bubble chart (event loop blocking)
clinic bubbles -- node dist/server.js
# Load with autocannon while profiling
autocannon -c 50 -d 30 http://localhost:3000/api/tasks &
clinic flame -- node dist/server.js
# Method 2: Node.js built-in profiler
node --prof dist/server.js
# After running some load:
node --prof-process isolate-*.log | head -100
# Method 3: V8 CPU profiler via inspector
node --inspect dist/server.js
# Open Chrome DevTools → Performance → Record
Heap Snapshot / Memory Leak Detection
// Add to your server for on-demand heap snapshots
import v8 from 'v8'
import fs from 'fs'
// Endpoint: POST /debug/heap-snapshot (protect with auth!)
app.post('/debug/heap-snapshot', (req, res) => {
const filename = `heap-${Date.now()}.heapsnapshot`
const snapshot = v8.writeHeapSnapshot(filename)
res.json({ snapshot })
})
# Take snapshots over time and compare in Chrome DevTools
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/debug/heap-snapshot
# Wait 5 minutes of load
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/debug/heap-snapshot
# Open both snapshots in Chrome → Memory → Compare
Detect Event Loop Blocking
// Add blocked-at to detect synchronous blocking
import blocked from 'blocked-at'
blocked((time, stack) => {
console.warn(`Event loop blocked for ${time}ms`)
console.warn(stack.join('\n'))
}, { threshold: 100 }) // Alert if blocked > 100ms
Node.js Memory Profiling Script
Read the detailed procedure and examples when working on this part of the task.
Python Profiling
CPU Profiling with py-spy
# Install
pip install py-spy
# Profile a running process (no code changes needed)
py-spy top --pid $(pgrep -f "uvicorn")
# Generate flamegraph SVG
py-spy record -o flamegraph.svg --pid $(pgrep -f "uvicorn") --duration 30
# Profile from the start
py-spy record -o flamegraph.svg -- python -m uvicorn app.main:app
# Open flamegraph.svg in browser — look for wide bars = hot code paths
cProfile for function-level profiling
# scripts/profile_endpoint.py
import cProfile
import pstats
import io
from app.services.task_service import TaskService
def run():
service = TaskService()
for _ in range(100):
service.list_tasks(user_id="user_1", page=1, limit=20)
profiler = cProfile.Profile()
profiler.enable()
run()
profiler.disable()
# Print top 20 functions by cumulative time
stream = io.StringIO()
stats = pstats.Stats(profiler, stream=stream)
stats.sort_stats('cumulative')
stats.print_stats(20)
print(stream.getvalue())
Memory profiling with memory_profiler
# pip install memory-profiler
from memory_profiler import profile
@profile
def my_function():
# Function to profile
data = load_large_dataset()
result = process(data)
return result
# Run with line-by-line memory tracking
python -m memory_profiler scripts/profile_function.py
# Output:
# Line # Mem usage Increment Line Contents
# ================================================
# 10 45.3 MiB 45.3 MiB def my_function():
# 11 78.1 MiB 32.8 MiB data = load_large_dataset()
# 12 156.2 MiB 78.1 MiB result = process(data)
Go Profiling with pprof
// main.go — add pprof endpoints
import _ "net/http/pprof"
import "net/http"
func main() {
// pprof endpoints at /debug/pprof/
go func() {
log.Println(http.ListenAndServe(":6060", nil))
}()
// ... rest of your app
}
# CPU profile (30s)
go tool pprof -http=:8080 http://localhost:6060/debug/pprof/profile?seconds=30
# Memory profile
go tool pprof -http=:8080 http://localhost:6060/debug/pprof/heap
# Goroutine leak detection
curl http://localhost:6060/debug/pprof/goroutine?debug=1
# In pprof UI: "Flame Graph" view → find the tallest bars
Bundle Size Analysis
Next.js Bundle Analyzer
# Install
pnpm add -D @next/bundle-analyzer
# next.config.js
const withBundleAnalyzer = require('@next/bundle-analyzer')({
enabled: process.env.ANALYZE === 'true',
})
module.exports = withBundleAnalyzer({})
# Run analyzer
ANALYZE=true pnpm build
# Opens browser with treemap of bundle
What to look for
# Find the largest chunks
pnpm build 2>&1 | grep -E "^\s+(λ|○|●)" | sort -k4 -rh | head -20
# Check if a specific package is too large
# Visit: https://bundlephobia.com/package/moment@2.29.4
# moment: 67.9kB gzipped → replace with date-fns (13.8kB) or dayjs (6.9kB)
# Find duplicate packages
pnpm dedupe --check
# Visualize what's in a chunk
npx source-map-explorer .next/static/chunks/*.js
Common bundle wins
// Before: import entire lodash
import _ from 'lodash' // 71kB
// After: import only what you need
import debounce from 'lodash/debounce' // 2kB
// Before: moment.js
import moment from 'moment' // 67kB
// After: dayjs
import dayjs from 'dayjs' // 7kB
// Before: static import (always in bundle)
import HeavyChart from '@/components/HeavyChart'
// After: dynamic import (loaded on demand)
const HeavyChart = dynamic(() => import('@/components/HeavyChart'), {
loading: () => <Skeleton />,
})
Database Query Optimization
Find slow queries
-- PostgreSQL: enable pg_stat_statements
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS pg_stat_statements;
-- Top 20 slowest queries
SELECT
round(mean_exec_time::numeric, 2) AS mean_ms,
calls,
round(total_exec_time::numeric, 2) AS total_ms,
round(stddev_exec_time::numeric, 2) AS stddev_ms,
left(query, 80) AS query
FROM pg_stat_statements
WHERE calls > 10
ORDER BY mean_exec_time DESC
LIMIT 20;
-- Reset stats
SELECT pg_stat_statements_reset();
# MySQL slow query log
mysql -e "SET GLOBAL slow_query_log = 'ON'; SET GLOBAL long_query_time = 0.1;"
tail -f /var/log/mysql/slow-query.log
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
-- Always use EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) for real timing
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, FORMAT TEXT)
SELECT t.*, u.name as assignee_name
FROM tasks t
LEFT JOIN users u ON u.id = t.assignee_id
WHERE t.project_id = 'proj_123'
AND t.deleted_at IS NULL
ORDER BY t.created_at DESC
LIMIT 20;
-- Look for:
-- Seq Scan on large table → needs index
-- Nested Loop with high rows → N+1, consider JOIN or batch
-- Sort → can index handle the sort?
-- Hash Join → fine for moderate sizes
Detect N+1 Queries
// Add query logging in dev
import { db } from './client'
// Drizzle: enable logging
const db = drizzle(pool, { logger: true })
// Or use a query counter middleware
let queryCount = 0
db.$on('query', () => queryCount++)
// In tests:
queryCount = 0
const tasks = await getTasksWithAssignees(projectId)
expect(queryCount).toBe(1) // Fail if it's 21 (1 + 20 N+1s)
# Django: detect N+1 with django-silk or nplusone
from nplusone.ext.django.middleware import NPlusOneMiddleware
MIDDLEWARE = ['nplusone.ext.django.middleware.NPlusOneMiddleware']
NPLUSONE_RAISE = True # Raise exception on N+1 in tests
Fix N+1 — Before/After
// Before: N+1 (1 query for tasks + N queries for assignees)
const tasks = await db.select().from(tasksTable)
for (const task of tasks) {
task.assignee = await db.select().from(usersTable)
.where(eq(usersTable.id, task.assigneeId))
.then(r => r[0])
}
// After: 1 query with JOIN
const tasks = await db
.select({
id: tasksTable.id,
title: tasksTable.title,
assigneeName: usersTable.name,
assigneeEmail: usersTable.email,
})
.from(tasksTable)
.leftJoin(usersTable, eq(usersTable.id, tasksTable.assigneeId))
.where(eq(tasksTable.projectId, projectId))
Load Testing with k6
Read the detailed procedure and examples when working on this part of the task.
Before/After Measurement Template
Read the detailed procedure and examples when working on this part of the task.
Optimization Checklist
Quick wins (check these first)
Database
□ Missing indexes on WHERE/ORDER BY columns
□ N+1 queries (check query count per request)
□ Loading all columns when only 2-3 needed (SELECT *)
□ No LIMIT on unbounded queries
□ Missing connection pool (creating new connection per request)
Node.js
□ Sync I/O (fs.readFileSync) in hot path
□ JSON.parse/stringify of large objects in hot loop
□ Missing caching for expensive computations
□ No compression (gzip/brotli) on responses
□ Dependencies loaded in request handler (move to module level)
Bundle
□ Moment.js → dayjs/date-fns
□ Lodash (full) → lodash/function imports
□ Static imports of heavy components → dynamic imports
□ Images not optimized / not using next/image
□ No code splitting on routes
API
□ No pagination on list endpoints
□ No response caching (Cache-Control headers)
□ Serial awaits that could be parallel (Promise.all)
□ Fetching related data in a loop instead of JOIN
Common Pitfalls
- Optimizing without measuring — you'll optimize the wrong thing
- Testing in development — profile against production-like data volumes
- Ignoring P99 — P50 can look fine while P99 is catastrophic
- Premature optimization — fix correctness first, then performance
- Not re-measuring — always verify the fix actually improved things
- Load testing production — use staging with production-size data
Best Practices
- Baseline first, always — record metrics before touching anything
- One change at a time — isolate the variable to confirm causation
- Profile with realistic data — 10 rows in dev, millions in prod — different bottlenecks
- Set performance budgets —
p(95) < 200msin CI thresholds with k6 - Monitor continuously — add Datadog/Prometheus metrics for key paths
- Cache invalidation strategy — cache aggressively, invalidate precisely
- Document the win — before/after in the PR description motivates the team