Manage Adr

Managing Architecture Decision Records

This project stores ADRs in docs/decisions/ following MADR 4.0 with project-specific conventions documented below.

File Conventions

• Path: docs/decisions/NNNN-kebab-case-title.md
• Numbering: zero-padded four digits, sequential. See "Get Sequence Number" below.
• Index: docs/decisions/README.md contains a table of all ADRs. Update it after every create, rename, or status change.

Running scripts bundled with this skill

Script paths in this document (e.g. scripts/) are resolved relative to this SKILL.md file, not to your current working directory. If a relative command fails to resolve, prefix it with the path your platform loaded this SKILL.md from.

Fallback. If python3 cannot be located, analyze the script's purpose and logic and execute its intent with available tools, but warn the user that python is not available and the logic was executed with a fallback approach that may not be perfect.

Running scripts bundled with this skill

Script paths in this document (e.g. scripts/) are resolved relative to this SKILL.md file, not to your current working directory. If a relative command fails to resolve, prefix it with the path your platform loaded this SKILL.md from.

ADR Template

Use assets/adr-template.md as the starting point. The template contains the exact frontmatter and section structure. Copy it, fill in the content, remove sections marked optional if unused.

Key rules:

• Frontmatter fields status and date are required. decision-makers is required for accepted decisions.
• status values: proposed, accepted, deprecated, superseded by NNNN
• date format: YYYY-MM-DD (date of last status change)
• The H1 title is a short imperative phrase: "Use X for Y", not "Decision about X"
• "Decision Outcome" must begin with Chosen option: **X**, because Y
• "Considered Options" is a bullet list. Detailed analysis goes under "### Considered Options in Detail" inside "Decision Outcome"
• Decision Drivers use numbered bold-label items: 1. **Label.** Description

Writing for durability

An accepted ADR is immutable: a permanent record of a decision at a point in time, not edited afterward. Everything in it must stay true and legible for years without depending on anything that changes. Apply these rules to Context, Drivers, Consequences, and rationale:

• No references to mutable documents. Do not cite architecture-doc section numbers (Section 5.3.5, §8.4), file line numbers, or any pointer into a doc that will be renumbered, rewritten, or deleted. The ADR cannot be edited to follow the move, so the reference rots into a lie. The reader also cannot resolve a bare Section 5.3.5 with no document named. State the fact directly in the ADR's own voice instead.
• No tracker IDs, and no ticket-driven framing. Do not cite issue or ticket IDs (#240, Jira keys), and never frame the ADR's reason for existing as "Issue #N requests X." An ADR records an architect's decision in response to a force in the system, not a response to a ticket. Open Context with the problem and its stakes.
• Ground claims in stable identifiers. Config field names (agent.max_sessions), table names (run_history), environment variables, tool names, and event field names change rarely and are meaningful without a lookup. Prefer them over document coordinates.
• Prefer self-containment over cross-references. Relating one ADR to another by filename is acceptable when it carries real lineage, but default to stating an inherited constraint as a fact (for example, "{Product_name} ships as a single statically-linked binary") rather than linking out.
• Use tense discipline for before-and-after state. Write enduring facts in the present tense. Write the specific deficiencies the decision removes in the past tense ("no table held a per-issue total"; "session_metadata kept only the latest session"). A present-tense claim about the pre-decision state ("run_history has no token columns") becomes false the day the decision ships, in a document you cannot edit.

Get Sequence Number

Two strategies depending on context:

Pre-assigned number (passed by caller or human): Use it directly. Do not call the script - this prevents duplicate numbers when multiple ADRs are created in parallel.

No number assigned (standalone use) python3 scripts/next_adr_number.py to get the next available number:

# Output: 0004

For batch allocation (multiple ADRs in one session) python3 scripts/next_adr_number.py --count 3 to reserve a block of numbers:

# Output:
# 0004
# 0005
# 0006

Allocate all numbers upfront before creating any files. This avoids the script returning the same number twice when files haven't been written yet.

By default the script resolves docs/decisions/ relative to its own location. If your ADRs live elsewhere - or the default path does not match the layout this skill was loaded from - pass --decision-dir <path> to override:

python3 scripts/next_adr_number.py --decision-dir docs/decisions
python3 scripts/next_adr_number.py --decision-dir docs/decisions --count 3

Operations

Create ADR

1. Get the next ADR number (see "Get Sequence Number" above).
2. Copy assets/adr-template.md to docs/decisions/NNNN-kebab-case-title.md.
3. Fill in frontmatter: status: proposed, date: <today>, decision-makers: <name>.
4. Write Context, Decision Drivers, Considered Options, and Decision Outcome. Follow "Writing for durability": self-contained, no references to mutable sources, framed from the architectural force rather than from a ticket.
5. Remove unused optional sections (Consequences, Confirmation).
6. Update docs/decisions/README.md - add a row to the table.

Update ADR Status

1. Edit the status field in frontmatter.
2. Update date to today.
3. If superseded, set status: superseded by NNNN and link to the replacement ADR.
4. Update the Status column in docs/decisions/README.md.

Validate ADRs

Check every file in docs/decisions/ (excluding README.md):

• Filename matches NNNN-kebab-case-title.md
• YAML frontmatter has status, date fields
• date is valid YYYY-MM-DD
• status is one of: proposed, accepted, deprecated, superseded by NNNN
• decision-makers is present and non-empty when status is accepted
• H1 title exists and is an imperative phrase
• Sections present: "Context and Problem Statement", "Considered Options", "Decision Outcome"
• "Decision Outcome" contains Chosen option: ** pattern
• "Considered Options" is a bullet list
• No references to mutable sources: no architecture-doc section numbers (Section N.N, §N), no file line numbers, no tracker issue/ticket IDs, and the rationale is not framed around a ticket
• docs/decisions/README.md table has a row for this ADR with correct title and status

Report all violations. Do not auto-fix without confirmation.

Update README Index

Regenerate the table in docs/decisions/README.md by scanning all ADR files:

| ADR                              | Title         | Status |
| -------------------------------- | ------------- | ------ |
| [NNNN](NNNN-kebab-case-title.md) | H1 title text | Status |

• Sort by ADR number ascending.
• Title column uses the H1 text from the ADR file.
• Status column uses the status frontmatter value, capitalized.
• Preserve the introductory paragraph and heading above the table.