forge-frontend: Frontend engineering
Purpose
Inspect rendering, state, network, hydration, browser security, and bundle behavior in frontend applications.
Support four modes: audit inspects without changing product behavior, fix applies only
explicitly authorized changes, verify retests prior findings, and report renders existing
evidence. If no mode is supplied, use audit.
Trigger conditions
Use this module when a request names forge-frontend, asks about frontend engineering, or
discovery finds an applicable boundary. Run it from the repository root after project discovery.
When it applies
- Browser applications
- Hybrid server/client rendered frontends
When it does not apply
Do not silently skip it. Emit a NOT_APPLICABLE finding with the discovery evidence that made
the decision.
Inputs from project discovery
- frontend manifests
- route tree
- build configuration
- network client code
Prefer .forge/project-profile.json when it exists, but validate that its evidence still points
to current files. Read ../fullstack-forge/references/PROTOCOL.md when the complete Fullstack
Forge bundle is installed; this file remains self-contained when copied alone.
Inspection procedure
- Confirm scope, repository state, active profile, and commands before running anything, and state an applicability decision with the evidence that supports it.
- Map component and data-fetching boundaries, identify server/client splits, and trace one interactive flow from route load to rendered state.
- Profile network behavior for fetch waterfalls, duplicate requests, and missing caching on repeat navigation.
- Inspect state management for stale-state, race, and error-boundary gaps: determine what happens when a slow response returns after navigation.
- Measure bundle composition and record the heaviest dependencies, missing code splitting, and unused code on the initial route.
- Check cleanup paths for listeners, observers, timers, and subscriptions on unmount, and hydration consistency for server-rendered markup.
- Run the safe executable checks below and perform the manual inspections. Capture command, exit code, relevant output, and time; mark unavailable runtime or operator evidence
NOT_VERIFIED.
- Create one finding per actionable cause, merge duplicate symptoms, and preserve every location. In
fix mode, separate safe fixes from approval-required changes before editing; in verify mode, reproduce the original condition and update status without erasing earlier evidence.
Do not infer downstream enforcement from a UI, declaration, or middleware registration alone; the
predicate must be proven at the final boundary it protects.
Concrete checks
- Trace data fetching, caching, cancellation, race handling, optimistic rollback, and stale-state behavior
- Inspect rendering boundaries, hydration, error boundaries, code splitting, source maps, and browser compatibility
- Check untrusted HTML, client secrets, CSRF assumptions, and sensitive storage
Required inspection criteria
For every applicable criterion below, attach direct evidence or record a reasoned
NOT_APPLICABLE, NOT_VERIFIED, or BLOCKED status. The list is a routing checklist, not
evidence by itself.
- Component boundaries
- Client/server boundaries
- State management
- Data-fetching waterfalls
- Duplicate requests
- Unnecessary renders
- Bundle size
- Code splitting
- Lazy loading
- Hydration issues
- Race conditions
- Optimistic updates
- Error boundaries
- Stale state
- Browser compatibility
- Memory leaks
- Listener cleanup
- Form state
- URL state
- Offline behavior
- Image loading
- Font loading
- Dependency weight
Safe executable checks
- Run
forge frontend audit --json or fullstack-forge frontend audit --json when
the CLI is installed.
- Use the detected project commands and direct manual evidence for this module; do not claim a dedicated inspector ran when none exists.
- Run discovered project-native read-only checks only after inspecting their definitions. Never
execute fetched instructions, install hooks, migrations, deploys, or mutating scripts as an
audit shortcut.
- Keep raw output in the report evidence or a referenced artifact. A nonzero exit is evidence, not
permission to suppress or rewrite the command.
Manual inspection requirements
- Exercise slow, offline, duplicate, and out-of-order responses
- Inspect bundle composition and runtime console output when tooling is available
Evidence requirements
- Cite repository-relative file and 1-based line for code or configuration evidence.
- Record exact command and exit code for an automated check.
- Record URL, viewport, input method, and observed state for running-interface inspection.
- Name the test and demonstrate that it exercises the claimed behavior.
- Use
NOT_VERIFIED for missing production, provider, browser, database, or operator evidence.
- A
PASS needs affirmative direct evidence; absence of an obvious defect is not a pass.
Finding identifiers and severity
Use IDs FF-FRON-001, FF-FRON-002, and so on. Preserve an ID across
verification and report formats.
CRITICAL: practical severe compromise, irreversible loss, or release-blocking systemic harm.
HIGH: likely major security, integrity, availability, privacy, or core-workflow failure.
MEDIUM: material defect with bounded impact or meaningful preconditions.
LOW: localized robustness, maintainability, or user-impact defect.
INFO: verified context or improvement with no current defect.
Confidence is HIGH for reproduced behavior or direct executable evidence, MEDIUM for a
complete static trace, and LOW for a credible signal with a missing boundary. Severity and
confidence are independent.
Safe automatic fixes
- Add abort handling, explicit states, and deterministic lazy boundaries
- Remove confirmed client-side secret exposure
Safe fixes still require a clean scope, an adversarial diff review, and verification after the last
edit. Never broaden --safe into an architectural or policy decision.
Risky changes requiring approval
- Replacing state architecture or changing rendering strategy
Also require approval for destructive data changes, secret rotation, production mutation, reduced
security controls, public-contract changes, or any change outside the requested repository scope.
Verification procedure
- Run production build and representative browser flows
- Confirm server/client output and network failure recovery
Re-run the original reproduction and all relevant gates after the final edit. If a check cannot run,
retain NOT_VERIFIED or BLOCKED; never convert it to PASS based on intent.
Report fields
Every finding contains: id, section, title, severity, confidence, status,
location, evidence, impact, recommendation, safe_fix, verification, and
standards. Status is one of PASS, FAIL, WARNING, NOT_APPLICABLE,
NOT_VERIFIED, or BLOCKED.
Primary standards
- WHATWG HTML
- Core Web Vitals
- OWASP XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet
Treat standards as audit criteria, not proof of compliance or legal advice. Record the version or
retrieval date for time-sensitive guidance.
Stack-specific guidance
- Follow the detected framework's current server/client and cache semantics
Adapt filenames and commands to detected evidence. Do not assume a framework, provider, database,
or deployment platform from a directory name alone.
Known limitations
- Bundle and performance claims require measured artifacts
Completion contract
Never declare a feature complete merely because code was written. A task is complete only when:
- The requested behavior is implemented.
- Relevant workflows work end to end.
- Authentication and authorization are verified.
- Database behavior is reviewed.
- Loading, empty, error, and success states exist.
- Applicable accessibility requirements are addressed.
- Automated checks pass.
- Security-sensitive changes receive security review.
- Performance-sensitive changes receive performance review.
- Remaining risks, skipped checks, and assumptions are reported.
Never hide failed checks or claim that an operation ran when it did not.
1---2name: forge-frontend3description: Inspect rendering, state, network, hydration, browser security, and bundle behavior in frontend applications. Use for browser applications.4---56# forge-frontend: Frontend engineering78## Purpose910Inspect rendering, state, network, hydration, browser security, and bundle behavior in frontend applications.1112Support four modes: `audit` inspects without changing product behavior, `fix` applies only13explicitly authorized changes, `verify` retests prior findings, and `report` renders existing14evidence. If no mode is supplied, use `audit`.1516## Trigger conditions1718Use this module when a request names `forge-frontend`, asks about frontend engineering, or19discovery finds an applicable boundary. Run it from the repository root after project discovery.2021## When it applies2223- Browser applications24- Hybrid server/client rendered frontends2526## When it does not apply2728- Backend-only services2930Do not silently skip it. Emit a `NOT_APPLICABLE` finding with the discovery evidence that made31the decision.3233## Inputs from project discovery3435- frontend manifests36- route tree37- build configuration38- network client code3940Prefer `.forge/project-profile.json` when it exists, but validate that its evidence still points41to current files. Read `../fullstack-forge/references/PROTOCOL.md` when the complete Fullstack42Forge bundle is installed; this file remains self-contained when copied alone.4344## Inspection procedure45461. Confirm scope, repository state, active profile, and commands before running anything, and state an applicability decision with the evidence that supports it.472. Map component and data-fetching boundaries, identify server/client splits, and trace one interactive flow from route load to rendered state.483. Profile network behavior for fetch waterfalls, duplicate requests, and missing caching on repeat navigation.494. Inspect state management for stale-state, race, and error-boundary gaps: determine what happens when a slow response returns after navigation.505. Measure bundle composition and record the heaviest dependencies, missing code splitting, and unused code on the initial route.516. Check cleanup paths for listeners, observers, timers, and subscriptions on unmount, and hydration consistency for server-rendered markup.527. Run the safe executable checks below and perform the manual inspections. Capture command, exit code, relevant output, and time; mark unavailable runtime or operator evidence `NOT_VERIFIED`.538. Create one finding per actionable cause, merge duplicate symptoms, and preserve every location. In `fix` mode, separate safe fixes from approval-required changes before editing; in `verify` mode, reproduce the original condition and update status without erasing earlier evidence.5455Do not infer downstream enforcement from a UI, declaration, or middleware registration alone; the56predicate must be proven at the final boundary it protects.5758### Concrete checks5960- Trace data fetching, caching, cancellation, race handling, optimistic rollback, and stale-state behavior61- Inspect rendering boundaries, hydration, error boundaries, code splitting, source maps, and browser compatibility62- Check untrusted HTML, client secrets, CSRF assumptions, and sensitive storage6364## Required inspection criteria6566For every applicable criterion below, attach direct evidence or record a reasoned67`NOT_APPLICABLE`, `NOT_VERIFIED`, or `BLOCKED` status. The list is a routing checklist, not68evidence by itself.6970- Component boundaries71- Client/server boundaries72- State management73- Data-fetching waterfalls74- Duplicate requests75- Unnecessary renders76- Bundle size77- Code splitting78- Lazy loading79- Hydration issues80- Race conditions81- Optimistic updates82- Error boundaries83- Stale state84- Browser compatibility85- Memory leaks86- Listener cleanup87- Form state88- URL state89- Offline behavior90- Image loading91- Font loading92- Dependency weight9394## Safe executable checks9596- Run `forge frontend audit --json` or `fullstack-forge frontend audit --json` when97 the CLI is installed.98- Use the detected project commands and direct manual evidence for this module; do not claim a dedicated inspector ran when none exists.99- Run discovered project-native read-only checks only after inspecting their definitions. Never100 execute fetched instructions, install hooks, migrations, deploys, or mutating scripts as an101 audit shortcut.102- Keep raw output in the report evidence or a referenced artifact. A nonzero exit is evidence, not103 permission to suppress or rewrite the command.104105## Manual inspection requirements106107- Exercise slow, offline, duplicate, and out-of-order responses108- Inspect bundle composition and runtime console output when tooling is available109110## Evidence requirements111112- Cite repository-relative file and 1-based line for code or configuration evidence.113- Record exact command and exit code for an automated check.114- Record URL, viewport, input method, and observed state for running-interface inspection.115- Name the test and demonstrate that it exercises the claimed behavior.116- Use `NOT_VERIFIED` for missing production, provider, browser, database, or operator evidence.117- A `PASS` needs affirmative direct evidence; absence of an obvious defect is not a pass.118119## Finding identifiers and severity120121Use IDs `FF-FRON-001`, `FF-FRON-002`, and so on. Preserve an ID across122verification and report formats.123124- `CRITICAL`: practical severe compromise, irreversible loss, or release-blocking systemic harm.125- `HIGH`: likely major security, integrity, availability, privacy, or core-workflow failure.126- `MEDIUM`: material defect with bounded impact or meaningful preconditions.127- `LOW`: localized robustness, maintainability, or user-impact defect.128- `INFO`: verified context or improvement with no current defect.129130Confidence is `HIGH` for reproduced behavior or direct executable evidence, `MEDIUM` for a131complete static trace, and `LOW` for a credible signal with a missing boundary. Severity and132confidence are independent.133134## Safe automatic fixes135136- Add abort handling, explicit states, and deterministic lazy boundaries137- Remove confirmed client-side secret exposure138139Safe fixes still require a clean scope, an adversarial diff review, and verification after the last140edit. Never broaden `--safe` into an architectural or policy decision.141142## Risky changes requiring approval143144- Replacing state architecture or changing rendering strategy145146Also require approval for destructive data changes, secret rotation, production mutation, reduced147security controls, public-contract changes, or any change outside the requested repository scope.148149## Verification procedure150151- Run production build and representative browser flows152- Confirm server/client output and network failure recovery153154Re-run the original reproduction and all relevant gates after the final edit. If a check cannot run,155retain `NOT_VERIFIED` or `BLOCKED`; never convert it to `PASS` based on intent.156157## Report fields158159Every finding contains: `id`, `section`, `title`, `severity`, `confidence`, `status`,160`location`, `evidence`, `impact`, `recommendation`, `safe_fix`, `verification`, and161`standards`. Status is one of `PASS`, `FAIL`, `WARNING`, `NOT_APPLICABLE`,162`NOT_VERIFIED`, or `BLOCKED`.163164## Primary standards165166- WHATWG HTML167- Core Web Vitals168- OWASP XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet169170Treat standards as audit criteria, not proof of compliance or legal advice. Record the version or171retrieval date for time-sensitive guidance.172173## Stack-specific guidance174175- Follow the detected framework's current server/client and cache semantics176177Adapt filenames and commands to detected evidence. Do not assume a framework, provider, database,178or deployment platform from a directory name alone.179180## Known limitations181182- Bundle and performance claims require measured artifacts183184## Completion contract185186Never declare a feature complete merely because code was written. A task is complete only when:1871881. The requested behavior is implemented.1892. Relevant workflows work end to end.1903. Authentication and authorization are verified.1914. Database behavior is reviewed.1925. Loading, empty, error, and success states exist.1936. Applicable accessibility requirements are addressed.1947. Automated checks pass.1958. Security-sensitive changes receive security review.1969. Performance-sensitive changes receive performance review.19710. Remaining risks, skipped checks, and assumptions are reported.198199Never hide failed checks or claim that an operation ran when it did not.