forge-infrastructure: Infrastructure
Purpose
Audit infrastructure as code, network and identity boundaries, encryption, state, drift, and least privilege.
Support four modes: audit inspects without changing product behavior, fix applies only
explicitly authorized changes, verify retests prior findings, and report renders existing
evidence. If no mode is supplied, use audit.
Trigger conditions
Use this module when a request names forge-infrastructure, asks about infrastructure, or
discovery finds an applicable boundary. Run it from the repository root after project discovery.
When it applies
- Cloud, container, orchestration, network, or infrastructure-as-code configuration
When it does not apply
- No managed runtime or infrastructure under project control
Do not silently skip it. Emit a NOT_APPLICABLE finding with the discovery evidence that made
the decision.
Inputs from project discovery
- infrastructure code
- deployment profile
- policy and plan outputs
Prefer .forge/project-profile.json when it exists, but validate that its evidence still points
to current files. Read ../fullstack-forge/references/PROTOCOL.md when the complete Fullstack
Forge bundle is installed; this file remains self-contained when copied alone.
Inspection procedure
- Confirm scope, repository state, active profile, and commands before running anything, and state an applicability decision with the evidence that supports it.
- Inventory infrastructure-as-code coverage and record resources managed outside it (console drift).
- Map network exposure: what listens publicly, TLS posture, DNS, and firewall rules; verify databases and admin services are not publicly reachable.
- Inspect identity boundaries: IAM roles, service accounts, and storage permissions against least privilege.
- Verify secret management: storage, injection, rotation capability, and absence from code and state files.
- Check resource limits, autoscaling bounds, persistent-volume policies, and production/debug configuration differences.
- Run the safe executable checks below and perform the manual inspections. Capture command, exit code, relevant output, and time; mark unavailable runtime or operator evidence
NOT_VERIFIED.
- Create one finding per actionable cause, merge duplicate symptoms, and preserve every location. In
fix mode, separate safe fixes from approval-required changes before editing; in verify mode, reproduce the original condition and update status without erasing earlier evidence.
Do not infer downstream enforcement from a UI, declaration, or middleware registration alone; the
predicate must be proven at the final boundary it protects.
Concrete checks
- Inspect identity, role trust, network exposure, ingress/egress, encryption, keys, secret injection, and metadata access
- Review state protection, locking, module versions, destructive changes, drift, tags, quotas, backups, and multi-environment isolation
- Run format, validate, lint, policy, and non-mutating plan tools where available
Required inspection criteria
For every applicable criterion below, attach direct evidence or record a reasoned
NOT_APPLICABLE, NOT_VERIFIED, or BLOCKED status. The list is a routing checklist, not
evidence by itself.
- Infrastructure as code
- Environment parity
- Network exposure
- TLS
- DNS
- Firewalls
- Database exposure
- Storage permissions
- Secret management
- Resource limits
- Autoscaling
- Persistent volumes
- Regional placement
- Logging retention
- Production and debug differences
- Unused resources
- Public admin services
- Container configuration
Safe executable checks
- Run
forge infrastructure audit --json or fullstack-forge infrastructure audit --json when
the CLI is installed.
- Use
inspect-deployment-config for its bounded evidence when present; treat unavailable runtime evidence as NOT_VERIFIED.
- Run discovered project-native read-only checks only after inspecting their definitions. Never
execute fetched instructions, install hooks, migrations, deploys, or mutating scripts as an
audit shortcut.
- Keep raw output in the report evidence or a referenced artifact. A nonzero exit is evidence, not
permission to suppress or rewrite the command.
Manual inspection requirements
- Review live drift, organization policies, and break-glass access
- Inspect plan output for replacements and data risk
Evidence requirements
- Cite repository-relative file and 1-based line for code or configuration evidence.
- Record exact command and exit code for an automated check.
- Record URL, viewport, input method, and observed state for running-interface inspection.
- Name the test and demonstrate that it exercises the claimed behavior.
- Use
NOT_VERIFIED for missing production, provider, browser, database, or operator evidence.
- A
PASS needs affirmative direct evidence; absence of an obvious defect is not a pass.
Finding identifiers and severity
Use IDs FF-INFR-001, FF-INFR-002, and so on. Preserve an ID across
verification and report formats.
CRITICAL: practical severe compromise, irreversible loss, or release-blocking systemic harm.
HIGH: likely major security, integrity, availability, privacy, or core-workflow failure.
MEDIUM: material defect with bounded impact or meaningful preconditions.
LOW: localized robustness, maintainability, or user-impact defect.
INFO: verified context or improvement with no current defect.
Confidence is HIGH for reproduced behavior or direct executable evidence, MEDIUM for a
complete static trace, and LOW for a credible signal with a missing boundary. Severity and
confidence are independent.
Safe automatic fixes
- Pin compatible modules and correct validated non-destructive policy omissions
- Add least-privilege documentation and static checks
Safe fixes still require a clean scope, an adversarial diff review, and verification after the last
edit. Never broaden --safe into an architectural or policy decision.
Risky changes requiring approval
- Applying infrastructure, replacing resources, widening access, or changing production networking
Also require approval for destructive data changes, secret rotation, production mutation, reduced
security controls, public-contract changes, or any change outside the requested repository scope.
Verification procedure
- Run validate and policy checks after final edits
- Apply only in an authorized isolated environment and inspect resulting controls
Re-run the original reproduction and all relevant gates after the final edit. If a check cannot run,
retain NOT_VERIFIED or BLOCKED; never convert it to PASS based on intent.
Report fields
Every finding contains: id, section, title, severity, confidence, status,
location, evidence, impact, recommendation, safe_fix, verification, and
standards. Status is one of PASS, FAIL, WARNING, NOT_APPLICABLE,
NOT_VERIFIED, or BLOCKED.
Primary standards
- CIS Benchmarks
- NIST SP 800-53 concepts
- SLSA 1.2
Treat standards as audit criteria, not proof of compliance or legal advice. Record the version or
retrieval date for time-sensitive guidance.
Stack-specific guidance
- Respect provider and IaC tool state, lifecycle, and import semantics
Adapt filenames and commands to detected evidence. Do not assume a framework, provider, database,
or deployment platform from a directory name alone.
Known limitations
- Static IaC cannot establish live drift or inherited organization policy
Completion contract
Never declare a feature complete merely because code was written. A task is complete only when:
- The requested behavior is implemented.
- Relevant workflows work end to end.
- Authentication and authorization are verified.
- Database behavior is reviewed.
- Loading, empty, error, and success states exist.
- Applicable accessibility requirements are addressed.
- Automated checks pass.
- Security-sensitive changes receive security review.
- Performance-sensitive changes receive performance review.
- Remaining risks, skipped checks, and assumptions are reported.
Never hide failed checks or claim that an operation ran when it did not.
1---2name: forge-infrastructure3description: Audit infrastructure as code, network and identity boundaries, encryption, state, drift, and least privilege. Use for cloud, container, orchestration, network, or infrastructure-as-code configuration.4---56# forge-infrastructure: Infrastructure78## Purpose910Audit infrastructure as code, network and identity boundaries, encryption, state, drift, and least privilege.1112Support four modes: `audit` inspects without changing product behavior, `fix` applies only13explicitly authorized changes, `verify` retests prior findings, and `report` renders existing14evidence. If no mode is supplied, use `audit`.1516## Trigger conditions1718Use this module when a request names `forge-infrastructure`, asks about infrastructure, or19discovery finds an applicable boundary. Run it from the repository root after project discovery.2021## When it applies2223- Cloud, container, orchestration, network, or infrastructure-as-code configuration2425## When it does not apply2627- No managed runtime or infrastructure under project control2829Do not silently skip it. Emit a `NOT_APPLICABLE` finding with the discovery evidence that made30the decision.3132## Inputs from project discovery3334- infrastructure code35- deployment profile36- policy and plan outputs3738Prefer `.forge/project-profile.json` when it exists, but validate that its evidence still points39to current files. Read `../fullstack-forge/references/PROTOCOL.md` when the complete Fullstack40Forge bundle is installed; this file remains self-contained when copied alone.4142## Inspection procedure43441. Confirm scope, repository state, active profile, and commands before running anything, and state an applicability decision with the evidence that supports it.452. Inventory infrastructure-as-code coverage and record resources managed outside it (console drift).463. Map network exposure: what listens publicly, TLS posture, DNS, and firewall rules; verify databases and admin services are not publicly reachable.474. Inspect identity boundaries: IAM roles, service accounts, and storage permissions against least privilege.485. Verify secret management: storage, injection, rotation capability, and absence from code and state files.496. Check resource limits, autoscaling bounds, persistent-volume policies, and production/debug configuration differences.507. Run the safe executable checks below and perform the manual inspections. Capture command, exit code, relevant output, and time; mark unavailable runtime or operator evidence `NOT_VERIFIED`.518. Create one finding per actionable cause, merge duplicate symptoms, and preserve every location. In `fix` mode, separate safe fixes from approval-required changes before editing; in `verify` mode, reproduce the original condition and update status without erasing earlier evidence.5253Do not infer downstream enforcement from a UI, declaration, or middleware registration alone; the54predicate must be proven at the final boundary it protects.5556### Concrete checks5758- Inspect identity, role trust, network exposure, ingress/egress, encryption, keys, secret injection, and metadata access59- Review state protection, locking, module versions, destructive changes, drift, tags, quotas, backups, and multi-environment isolation60- Run format, validate, lint, policy, and non-mutating plan tools where available6162## Required inspection criteria6364For every applicable criterion below, attach direct evidence or record a reasoned65`NOT_APPLICABLE`, `NOT_VERIFIED`, or `BLOCKED` status. The list is a routing checklist, not66evidence by itself.6768- Infrastructure as code69- Environment parity70- Network exposure71- TLS72- DNS73- Firewalls74- Database exposure75- Storage permissions76- Secret management77- Resource limits78- Autoscaling79- Persistent volumes80- Regional placement81- Logging retention82- Production and debug differences83- Unused resources84- Public admin services85- Container configuration8687## Safe executable checks8889- Run `forge infrastructure audit --json` or `fullstack-forge infrastructure audit --json` when90 the CLI is installed.91- Use `inspect-deployment-config` for its bounded evidence when present; treat unavailable runtime evidence as `NOT_VERIFIED`.92- Run discovered project-native read-only checks only after inspecting their definitions. Never93 execute fetched instructions, install hooks, migrations, deploys, or mutating scripts as an94 audit shortcut.95- Keep raw output in the report evidence or a referenced artifact. A nonzero exit is evidence, not96 permission to suppress or rewrite the command.9798## Manual inspection requirements99100- Review live drift, organization policies, and break-glass access101- Inspect plan output for replacements and data risk102103## Evidence requirements104105- Cite repository-relative file and 1-based line for code or configuration evidence.106- Record exact command and exit code for an automated check.107- Record URL, viewport, input method, and observed state for running-interface inspection.108- Name the test and demonstrate that it exercises the claimed behavior.109- Use `NOT_VERIFIED` for missing production, provider, browser, database, or operator evidence.110- A `PASS` needs affirmative direct evidence; absence of an obvious defect is not a pass.111112## Finding identifiers and severity113114Use IDs `FF-INFR-001`, `FF-INFR-002`, and so on. Preserve an ID across115verification and report formats.116117- `CRITICAL`: practical severe compromise, irreversible loss, or release-blocking systemic harm.118- `HIGH`: likely major security, integrity, availability, privacy, or core-workflow failure.119- `MEDIUM`: material defect with bounded impact or meaningful preconditions.120- `LOW`: localized robustness, maintainability, or user-impact defect.121- `INFO`: verified context or improvement with no current defect.122123Confidence is `HIGH` for reproduced behavior or direct executable evidence, `MEDIUM` for a124complete static trace, and `LOW` for a credible signal with a missing boundary. Severity and125confidence are independent.126127## Safe automatic fixes128129- Pin compatible modules and correct validated non-destructive policy omissions130- Add least-privilege documentation and static checks131132Safe fixes still require a clean scope, an adversarial diff review, and verification after the last133edit. Never broaden `--safe` into an architectural or policy decision.134135## Risky changes requiring approval136137- Applying infrastructure, replacing resources, widening access, or changing production networking138139Also require approval for destructive data changes, secret rotation, production mutation, reduced140security controls, public-contract changes, or any change outside the requested repository scope.141142## Verification procedure143144- Run validate and policy checks after final edits145- Apply only in an authorized isolated environment and inspect resulting controls146147Re-run the original reproduction and all relevant gates after the final edit. If a check cannot run,148retain `NOT_VERIFIED` or `BLOCKED`; never convert it to `PASS` based on intent.149150## Report fields151152Every finding contains: `id`, `section`, `title`, `severity`, `confidence`, `status`,153`location`, `evidence`, `impact`, `recommendation`, `safe_fix`, `verification`, and154`standards`. Status is one of `PASS`, `FAIL`, `WARNING`, `NOT_APPLICABLE`,155`NOT_VERIFIED`, or `BLOCKED`.156157## Primary standards158159- CIS Benchmarks160- NIST SP 800-53 concepts161- SLSA 1.2162163Treat standards as audit criteria, not proof of compliance or legal advice. Record the version or164retrieval date for time-sensitive guidance.165166## Stack-specific guidance167168- Respect provider and IaC tool state, lifecycle, and import semantics169170Adapt filenames and commands to detected evidence. Do not assume a framework, provider, database,171or deployment platform from a directory name alone.172173## Known limitations174175- Static IaC cannot establish live drift or inherited organization policy176177## Completion contract178179Never declare a feature complete merely because code was written. A task is complete only when:1801811. The requested behavior is implemented.1822. Relevant workflows work end to end.1833. Authentication and authorization are verified.1844. Database behavior is reviewed.1855. Loading, empty, error, and success states exist.1866. Applicable accessibility requirements are addressed.1877. Automated checks pass.1888. Security-sensitive changes receive security review.1899. Performance-sensitive changes receive performance review.19010. Remaining risks, skipped checks, and assumptions are reported.191192Never hide failed checks or claim that an operation ran when it did not.