Visual Thinking

Visual Thinking

sethdford d6fa8e8 2 files · 1.4 KB Updated

File contents

Visual Thinking

Externalize structure: relationships, sequence, trade-offs, and overlap are often clearer in space than in prose. Use the lightest diagram that resolves the confusion.

When to Use

  • Textual explanation loops without convergence.
  • The problem has spatial, temporal, or dependency structure (flows, ownership, states).
  • Comparing multiple options or scenarios overloads working memory.

Workflow

  1. Name the decision or confusion in one line.
  2. Pick a form: mind map (radial associations), concept map (labeled links), flowchart (process), 2×2 (two-axis trade-off), timeline (sequence), Venn (overlap), or sketchnote (icons + keywords).
  3. Build the diagram (ASCII, Mermaid, or clear verbal layout if no canvas).
  4. Read back one insight the picture forces that prose hid; update the diagram if the model shifts.

Examples

Example 1: Architecture debate: draw data flow + trust boundaries before arguing libraries.

Example 2: Three pricing tiers: 2×2 of “self-serve vs assisted” vs “low vs high commitment” to expose gaps.

sethdford/h-uman/tree/main/skill-registry/skills/visual-thinking commit d6fa8e80af

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add sethdford/visual-thinking