shenjj2025-oss Legal Litigation Timeline Builder
Overview
Organizes litigation facts, procedural events, deadlines, and evidence references into a coherent case timeline. This is a descriptive OpenClaw skill for legal-industry workflow support. It provides structured frameworks, checklists, templates, and issue-spotting prompts. It does not execute code, call external APIs, access legal databases, retrieve court records, automate filings, or perform legal services.
When to Use
- Preparing pleadings or motions
- Understanding fact chronology
- Coordinating litigation deadlines
Target Users
- Litigators
- Paralegals
- Case managers
- Trial teams
Inputs to Collect
- Matter or project context, including jurisdiction if known
- Relevant facts, documents, parties, dates, and constraints
- Desired output format, audience, and level of detail
- Known deadlines, risk concerns, or review priorities
Core Modules
- Fact chronology table — provides structured prompts, checklists, and review fields for this area.
- Procedural deadline tracker — provides structured prompts, checklists, and review fields for this area.
- Source/evidence reference field — provides structured prompts, checklists, and review fields for this area.
- Disputed vs undisputed facts — provides structured prompts, checklists, and review fields for this area.
- Gap and follow-up list — provides structured prompts, checklists, and review fields for this area.
Workflow
- Confirm the user's legal workflow goal and the relevant practice context.
- Ask for missing facts, documents, dates, parties, jurisdiction, and audience where needed.
- Apply the modules below as a structured thinking framework.
- Produce checklists, templates, matrices, memos, or planning aids tailored to the user's context.
- Flag uncertainty, verification needs, deadlines, ethics concerns, confidentiality issues, and attorney-review points.
Expected Outputs
- Chronology table
- Deadline tracker
- Evidence reference map
- Fact-gap list
Example Prompts
- "Build a litigation timeline template for a breach of contract case."
- "Help organize these facts into disputed and undisputed chronology."
Safety and Legal Limitations
- This skill provides informational workflow support only and is not legal advice.
- It does not create an attorney-client relationship and does not replace review by a qualified attorney.
- Laws, court rules, deadlines, ethics duties, privilege, confidentiality, and professional responsibility rules vary by jurisdiction and matter.
- Users must verify all legal authorities, filing requirements, deadlines, facts, citations, and strategic decisions with qualified counsel.
- The skill must not be used to fabricate evidence, coach false testimony, evade regulation, access data unlawfully, or bypass confidentiality obligations.
- Specific limitation for this skill: Users must verify court deadlines, rules, and evidence admissibility independently.
Acceptance Criteria
- Package is descriptive only: no handler.py, scripts, external APIs, network calls, or command execution.
- SKILL.md and README.md are English-first and include an explicit legal-information disclaimer.
- Outputs are frameworks, checklists, templates, or planning aids rather than legal conclusions.
- Includes target users, when-to-use guidance, inputs, workflow, outputs, examples, and safety limitations.
- skill.json contains unique slug, tags, trigger keywords, requires_api=false, and readiness=stable.