GRAPHQL Security

GraphQL Security

Rules (for AI agents)

ALWAYS

• Enforce a cost budget on every operation: a maximum depth, plus a complexity score that weights list fields by the page size they can request. Derive the numbers from your own schema and measure them — a depth of 7 is generous for a flat schema and far too permissive for one with a many-to-many edge, where five levels of nesting can address billions of nodes. references/graphql-limits.md covers how to derive them and where each server configures them.
• Rate-limit by cost consumed, not by request count. Every operation arrives at the same URL, so the per-route limit api-security specifies cannot tell a trivial query from one costing a thousand times more. Charge the complexity score against the caller's budget.
• For a public or high-traffic API, restrict it to pre-registered operations — a build-time allowlist of the documents the client bundle actually contains, keyed by hash. Automatic Persisted Queries are not this: APQ lets a client register any operation it likes and then send its hash, which is a bandwidth optimization. Turning on APQ and believing the API is now allowlisted is a common and expensive mistake.
• Cap aliases per operation and operations per batch, and apply that counting to authentication and other rate-limited paths. One request carrying a hundred aliased login fields is a hundred attempts against any counter that increments once per request — this is the mechanism behind the account-takeover-by-batching incidents, not a bandwidth concern.
• Batch resolver fetches with a DataLoader or a join. An N+1 resolver turns one cheap-looking query into a database round trip per parent row — the same amplification the cost limit exists to bound, except it happens below the cost analysis where that limit cannot see it.
• Key any response cache on the operation hash, the variables, and the caller's authorization claims. POST /graphql is one URL for every request, so a cache keyed on the URL serves one tenant's data to another.
• Validate the contents of JSON, custom scalar, and loosely-typed input arguments inside the resolver. The schema's type checking is what makes GraphQL inputs feel safe, and a JSON scalar opts straight out of it: whatever arrives is handed through unexamined.
• Disable introspection and the in-browser playground (GraphiQL, Apollo Sandbox) on production endpoints — and understand what that buys. It raises the cost of reconnaissance and nothing more: field suggestions in error messages still leak names, tools reconstruct schemas from them, and every field stays callable whether or not it can be listed. Schema obscurity is never the authorization.
• Consult auth-security for authorization, and run it per field rather than at the endpoint. One HTTP response aggregates many resolvers, so a single unguarded sensitive field leaks through any query that reaches it.
• Consult error-handling-security for what an error may carry. The errors array is GraphQL's public contract and field-level validation detail belongs in it; what must not appear there is the stack trace, the SQL, or resolver internals. Flattening a validation failure to a bare INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR is hostile to callers without being safer.
• Consult file-upload-security for GraphQL multipart uploads. Arriving over GraphQL changes nothing about the rules there — quarantine, type validation, expansion limits, and scanning policy all still apply.

NEVER

• Trust a query's shape because "our clients only send well-formed queries". Anyone can post to /graphql.
• Let @skip / @include decide whether an authorization check runs. They are execution directives evaluated before resolvers, which makes them a probe channel — an attacker toggles a field and reads the difference in the response — not a place to put a security decision.
• Rely on a hand-rolled executor to reject a cyclic fragment. The specification requires the NoFragmentCycles validation rule and conforming servers enforce it during validation; an executor that skips the validation phase does not.

KNOWN FALSE POSITIVES

• Pre-registered operations are already bounded, so depth and complexity checks on them are redundant. Keep the checks for anything arriving outside the allowlist.
• A public, read-only data API may run deliberately high cost limits with aggressive CDN caching. That is a documented per-endpoint trade-off, not an oversight.
• Introspection left on for an internal developer tool is acceptable only where the endpoint's authorization would be acceptable with introspection both on and off. Network placement — a VPN, a private subnet — is not the justification; reachability is not authentication.

Context (for humans)

GraphQL is not more powerful than a REST API in the computational sense. The query language has no loops, no recursion — the specification's validation rules forbid fragment cycles — and no arbitrary branching. What it has is amplification: one request can address an enormous amount of work, and one URL carries all of it.

That combination is what defeats controls built for REST. A per-route rate limit sees one route. A URL-keyed cache sees one key. A request counter sees one request, even when it carries a hundred aliased login attempts. Each of those controls is doing exactly what it was designed to do, against a shape it was not designed for — which is why the GraphQL-specific answer is almost always to move the unit of accounting from the request to the cost of the operation.

The second recurring failure is a control that sounds stronger than it is. Introspection off is reconnaissance cost, not access control. Automatic Persisted Queries are a bandwidth feature, not an allowlist. A schema type is a parser guarantee, not validation, once a JSON scalar is in play.

References

• references/verifying-findings.md — confirm or refute a finding, then lock it
• references/graphql-limits.md — deriving depth and complexity from your schema, where each server configures limits, and APQ versus trusted documents
• rules/graphql_safe_config.json
• OWASP GraphQL Cheat Sheet.
• GraphQL specification — validation.
• CWE-400.
• graphql-armor.