Refactor Code
Improve readability, cohesion, and maintainability without changing behavior.
The code engine of the refactoring vertical (/refactor code). Draws on
typescript-refactor for type-architecture work and react-refactor for component
architecture. For mechanical AI-slop removal use deslop; for a read-only structural
review use structural-review.
Triggers
- Function > 50 lines
- File > 300 lines
- Duplicate code (3+ instances)
- Complex conditionals (> 3 levels deep)
any types
- Hard to test or understand
- Vague naming and mixed responsibilities
- Dead abstractions, dead code, or misleading comments
Steps
1. Lock Behavior First
- Read existing tests before editing
- If behavior is unclear, derive it from current callers and runtime paths
- Preserve public contracts unless explicitly asked for API changes
2. Study Local Patterns
Find 3+ similar implementations in the codebase. Match naming, error handling, file structure, and test style. Reuse existing helpers before introducing new abstractions.
3. Refactor for Clarity
Small, incremental changes — one at a time. Prioritize in order:
- Better names
- Smaller focused functions (extract long methods into helpers)
- Clearer control flow
- Removing duplication
- Removing dead code and misleading comments
- Narrowing types and interfaces (replace
any with proper types)
- Extract constants (replace magic numbers/strings)
- Extract service/component (move business logic out of controllers, split large components)
4. Avoid Over-Engineering
- Don't introduce patterns just because they're fashionable
- Prefer straightforward code over clever indirection
- Extract abstractions only when they reduce real duplication or confusion
5. Run Tests After Each Change
bun run test <specific-test-file>
Heuristics
- One function should do one job
- Names should explain intent, not implementation trivia
- Comments should explain why, not restate what the code already says
- Conditionals should read top-to-bottom without mental backtracking
- Shared logic belongs in one place, but not at the cost of unreadable abstractions
Red Flags (Stop and Reconsider)
- Generic names like
data, item, temp, helper, util
- Boolean parameters that change function meaning
- Functions that both fetch, transform, and render
- Duplicate validation or mapping logic
- Commented-out code or TODOs masking uncertainty
- Behavior changes during refactoring
- Tests start failing
- Need to change public API
- Unclear what code does
Checklist
Before starting:
During:
After:
1---
2name: refactor-code
3description: Systematic approach to safely refactoring code with tests. Use when user says 'refactor', 'clean up code', 'simplify', 'reduce complexity', or 'technical debt'.
4metadata:
5 version: "1.1.1"
6 tags: "refactoring, code-quality, testing, maintenance, clean-code"
7---
8
9# Refactor Code
10
11Improve readability, cohesion, and maintainability without changing behavior.
12
13The `code` engine of the refactoring vertical (`/refactor code`). Draws on
14`typescript-refactor` for type-architecture work and `react-refactor` for component
15architecture. For mechanical AI-slop removal use `deslop`; for a read-only structural
16review use `structural-review`.
17
18## Triggers
19
20- Function > 50 lines
21- File > 300 lines
22- Duplicate code (3+ instances)
23- Complex conditionals (> 3 levels deep)
24- `any` types
25- Hard to test or understand
26- Vague naming and mixed responsibilities
27- Dead abstractions, dead code, or misleading comments
28
29## Steps
30
31### 1. Lock Behavior First
32
33- Read existing tests before editing
34- If behavior is unclear, derive it from current callers and runtime paths
35- Preserve public contracts unless explicitly asked for API changes
36
37### 2. Study Local Patterns
38
39Find 3+ similar implementations in the codebase. Match naming, error handling, file structure, and test style. Reuse existing helpers before introducing new abstractions.
40
41### 3. Refactor for Clarity
42
43Small, incremental changes — one at a time. Prioritize in order:
44
451. Better names
462. Smaller focused functions (extract long methods into helpers)
473. Clearer control flow
484. Removing duplication
495. Removing dead code and misleading comments
506. Narrowing types and interfaces (replace `any` with proper types)
517. Extract constants (replace magic numbers/strings)
528. Extract service/component (move business logic out of controllers, split large components)
53
54### 4. Avoid Over-Engineering
55
56- Don't introduce patterns just because they're fashionable
57- Prefer straightforward code over clever indirection
58- Extract abstractions only when they reduce real duplication or confusion
59
60### 5. Run Tests After Each Change
61
62```bash
63bun run test <specific-test-file>
64```
65
66## Heuristics
67
68- One function should do one job
69- Names should explain intent, not implementation trivia
70- Comments should explain why, not restate what the code already says
71- Conditionals should read top-to-bottom without mental backtracking
72- Shared logic belongs in one place, but not at the cost of unreadable abstractions
73
74## Red Flags (Stop and Reconsider)
75
76- Generic names like `data`, `item`, `temp`, `helper`, `util`
77- Boolean parameters that change function meaning
78- Functions that both fetch, transform, and render
79- Duplicate validation or mapping logic
80- Commented-out code or TODOs masking uncertainty
81- Behavior changes during refactoring
82- Tests start failing
83- Need to change public API
84- Unclear what code does
85
86## Checklist
87
88Before starting:
89
90- [ ] All tests passing
91- [ ] Understand what the code does
92- [ ] Have example pattern to follow
93- [ ] Committed current working code
94
95During:
96
97- [ ] One change at a time
98- [ ] Tests after each change
99- [ ] Same public API
100- [ ] Document why (not just what)
101
102After:
103
104- [ ] All tests still passing
105- [ ] No behavior changes
106- [ ] Code is more readable
107- [ ] Performance same or better