Meeting Notes
When to Use
Trigger phrases: "take meeting notes", "summarize this meeting", "1:1 notes", "standup notes", "post-mortem notes", "会议纪要", "记录会议".
Also trigger when the user pastes raw transcript / bullet points and asks for cleanup.
The Template
Always produce notes with these five sections, in this order. Skip a section only if the user explicitly says it doesn't apply.
# <Meeting Title> — <YYYY-MM-DD>
**Attendees:** <name1>, <name2>, ...
**Duration:** <Nm>
**Recording:** <link or "n/a">
## Agenda
1. <topic>
2. <topic>
## Discussion
### <Topic 1>
- <key point>
- <key point with context>
### <Topic 2>
...
## Decisions
- ✅ <decision 1> — rationale: <why>
- ✅ <decision 2> — rationale: <why>
## Action Items
| # | Action | Owner | Deadline | Status |
|---|--------|-------|----------|--------|
| 1 | <action verb + outcome> | <person> | <YYYY-MM-DD> | <Open/Done/Blocked> |
| 2 | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## Open Questions
- <question that didn't get an answer>
- <question that needs follow-up>
Workflow
Gather input — if the user only sketched bullet points, ask for missing essentials via ask_user_question:
- Meeting title and date (default to today if not given)
- Attendees (at least names)
- Whether decisions / action items already exist or you should infer them
Extract — read the transcript / bullets carefully. For each line, classify:
- Background context → Discussion
- "We agreed", "We'll go with", "Decided to" → Decisions
- " will ", "Action: ...", "Owner: ..." → Action Items
- "?", "TBD", "needs follow-up" → Open Questions
Action Item Discipline (the high-value part):
- Every action MUST have an owner (a real name, not "team")
- Every action MUST have a deadline (a specific date, not "soon" or "next week")
- If owner or deadline is missing, surface it explicitly with ⚠️ before the row, e.g.:
⚠️ Owner not assigned: <action> — let the user resolve
- Action verb first ("Draft …", "Review …", "Ship …"), not vague ("Look into …")
Decision Discipline: each decision should be one sentence with a brief "why" so future readers can reconstruct context.
Save (optional) — if the user wants to remember decisions / action items for future sessions, offer to save key items via save_memory (scope: "session" or "project"). Don't auto-save without confirming.
Style Rules
- Past tense for Discussion ("we discussed …"), present tense for Decisions ("we go with …"), imperative for Action Items ("Draft proposal …")
- Don't editorialize — just record what was said, decided, or assigned
- One bullet = one fact. No multi-clause sentences with embedded sub-points
- Keep technical jargon if it's the team's vocabulary; don't over-explain
- For multi-language meetings, default to the user's preferred language; mark code-switches with
[en] / [zh] if helpful
Common Pitfalls
| Mistake |
Fix |
| Vague action: "Look into auth" |
"Draft auth migration plan with timing estimates" |
| No owner: "Team will review" |
Surface as ⚠️ and ask who owns it |
| No deadline: "By next week" |
Pin to a specific date (YYYY-MM-DD); ask if unclear |
| Mixing decisions with discussion |
Decisions get the ✅ section; everything else stays in Discussion |
| Listing everything said |
Compress — one bullet per substantive point, not per sentence |
Example
Input:
hi all - q3 planning. we need to ship feature X by oct. alice will write the spec
- kevin: should we cut feature Y? yes everyone agrees
- bob will run user research starting next mon
- still unclear who owns infra migration
Output:
# Q3 Planning — 2026-04-25
**Attendees:** Alice, Kevin, Bob
**Duration:** 30m
**Recording:** n/a
## Agenda
1. Feature X timeline
2. Feature Y status
3. Open ownership questions
## Discussion
### Feature X
- Targeting October ship date
### Feature Y
- Considered cutting from Q3 to focus on X
## Decisions
- ✅ Ship Feature X by October — rationale: aligned with Q3 OKRs
- ✅ Cut Feature Y from Q3 — rationale: capacity constrained
## Action Items
| # | Action | Owner | Deadline | Status |
|---|--------|-------|----------|--------|
| 1 | Draft Feature X spec | Alice | 2026-05-02 | Open |
| 2 | Run user research wave | Bob | 2026-04-28 | Open |
## Open Questions
- ⚠️ Owner not assigned: Infrastructure migration
1---2name: meeting-notes3description: Use when the user asks to capture, structure, or summarize meeting notes / call notes / 1:1 discussion / standup notes. Produces a standard template with attendees, agenda, decisions, action items (owner + deadline), and open questions.4license: MIT5---6
7# Meeting Notes
8
9## When to Use
10
11Trigger phrases: "take meeting notes", "summarize this meeting", "1:1 notes", "standup notes", "post-mortem notes", "会议纪要", "记录会议".
12
13Also trigger when the user pastes raw transcript / bullet points and asks for cleanup.
14
15## The Template
16
17Always produce notes with these five sections, in this order. Skip a section only if the user explicitly says it doesn't apply.
18
19```markdown
20# <Meeting Title> — <YYYY-MM-DD>
21
22**Attendees:** <name1>, <name2>, ...
23**Duration:** <Nm>
24**Recording:** <link or "n/a">
25
26## Agenda
27
281. <topic>
292. <topic>
30
31## Discussion
32
33### <Topic 1>
34- <key point>
35- <key point with context>
36
37### <Topic 2>
38...
39
40## Decisions
41
42- ✅ <decision 1> — rationale: <why>
43- ✅ <decision 2> — rationale: <why>
44
45## Action Items
46
47| # | Action | Owner | Deadline | Status |
48|---|--------|-------|----------|--------|
49| 1 | <action verb + outcome> | <person> | <YYYY-MM-DD> | <Open/Done/Blocked> |
50| 2 | ... | ... | ... | ... |
51
52## Open Questions
53
54- <question that didn't get an answer>
55- <question that needs follow-up>
56```
57
58## Workflow
59
601. **Gather input** — if the user only sketched bullet points, ask for missing essentials via `ask_user_question`:
61 - Meeting title and date (default to today if not given)
62 - Attendees (at least names)
63 - Whether decisions / action items already exist or you should infer them
64
652. **Extract** — read the transcript / bullets carefully. For each line, classify:
66 - Background context → Discussion
67 - "We agreed", "We'll go with", "Decided to" → Decisions
68 - "<X> will <verb>", "Action: ...", "Owner: ..." → Action Items
69 - "?", "TBD", "needs follow-up" → Open Questions
70
713. **Action Item Discipline (the high-value part)**:
72 - Every action MUST have an owner (a real name, not "team")
73 - Every action MUST have a deadline (a specific date, not "soon" or "next week")
74 - If owner or deadline is missing, surface it explicitly with ⚠️ before the row, e.g.: `⚠️ Owner not assigned: <action>` — let the user resolve
75 - Action verb first ("Draft …", "Review …", "Ship …"), not vague ("Look into …")
76
774. **Decision Discipline**: each decision should be one sentence with a brief "why" so future readers can reconstruct context.
78
795. **Save (optional)** — if the user wants to remember decisions / action items for future sessions, offer to save key items via `save_memory` (scope: "session" or "project"). Don't auto-save without confirming.
80
81## Style Rules
82
83- Past tense for Discussion ("we discussed …"), present tense for Decisions ("we go with …"), imperative for Action Items ("Draft proposal …")
84- Don't editorialize — just record what was said, decided, or assigned
85- One bullet = one fact. No multi-clause sentences with embedded sub-points
86- Keep technical jargon if it's the team's vocabulary; don't over-explain
87- For multi-language meetings, default to the user's preferred language; mark code-switches with `[en]` / `[zh]` if helpful
88
89## Common Pitfalls
90
91| Mistake | Fix |
92|---|---|
93| Vague action: "Look into auth" | "Draft auth migration plan with timing estimates" |
94| No owner: "Team will review" | Surface as `⚠️` and ask who owns it |
95| No deadline: "By next week" | Pin to a specific date (`YYYY-MM-DD`); ask if unclear |
96| Mixing decisions with discussion | Decisions get the ✅ section; everything else stays in Discussion |
97| Listing everything said | Compress — one bullet per substantive point, not per sentence |
98
99## Example
100
101Input:
102```
103hi all - q3 planning. we need to ship feature X by oct. alice will write the spec
104- kevin: should we cut feature Y? yes everyone agrees
105- bob will run user research starting next mon
106- still unclear who owns infra migration
107```
108
109Output:
110```markdown
111# Q3 Planning — 2026-04-25
112
113**Attendees:** Alice, Kevin, Bob
114**Duration:** 30m
115**Recording:** n/a
116
117## Agenda
1181. Feature X timeline
1192. Feature Y status
1203. Open ownership questions
121
122## Discussion
123### Feature X
124- Targeting October ship date
125
126### Feature Y
127- Considered cutting from Q3 to focus on X
128
129## Decisions
130- ✅ Ship Feature X by October — rationale: aligned with Q3 OKRs
131- ✅ Cut Feature Y from Q3 — rationale: capacity constrained
132
133## Action Items
134| # | Action | Owner | Deadline | Status |
135|---|--------|-------|----------|--------|
136| 1 | Draft Feature X spec | Alice | 2026-05-02 | Open |
137| 2 | Run user research wave | Bob | 2026-04-28 | Open |
138
139## Open Questions
140- ⚠️ Owner not assigned: Infrastructure migration
141```