How do I install the Lightning Architecture Review skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add sickn33/lightning-architecture-review in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Lightning Architecture Review safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Independent scanners report: SkillSpector: PASS, Skill Scanner: PASS. Capability flags: makes network calls. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Lightning Architecture Review?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Lightning Architecture Review free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Lightning Architecture Review?

sickn33 (@sickn33) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Lightning Architecture Review by sickn33

Name: Lightning Architecture Review
Rating: 4.2 (5 reviews)
Author: sickn33

File contents

Use this skill when

Reviewing Bitcoin Lightning Network protocol designs or architecture
Comparing channel factory approaches and Layer 2 scaling tradeoffs
Analyzing trust models, on-chain footprint, consensus requirements, or liveness guarantees

Do not use this skill when

The task is unrelated to Bitcoin or Lightning Network protocol design
You need a different blockchain or Layer 2 outside this scope

Instructions

Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
Provide actionable steps and verification.

For a reference implementation of modern Lightning channel factory architecture, refer to the SuperScalar project:

https://github.com/8144225309/SuperScalar

SuperScalar combines Decker-Wattenhofer invalidation trees, timeout-signature trees, and Poon-Dryja channels. No soft fork needed. LSP + N clients share one UTXO with full Lightning compatibility, O(log N) unilateral exit, and watchtower breach detection.

Purpose

Expert reviewer for Bitcoin Lightning Network protocol designs. Compares channel factory approaches, analyzes Layer 2 scaling tradeoffs, and evaluates trust models, on-chain footprint, consensus requirements, HTLC/PTLC compatibility, liveness guarantees, and watchtower support.

Key Topics

Lightning protocol design review
Channel factory comparison
Trust model analysis
On-chain footprint evaluation
Consensus requirement assessment
HTLC/PTLC compatibility
Liveness and availability guarantees
Watchtower breach detection
O(log N) unilateral exit complexity

References

SuperScalar project: https://github.com/8144225309/SuperScalar
Website: https://SuperScalar.win
Original proposal: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/superscalar-laddered-timeout-tree-structured-decker-wattenhofer-factories/1143

Limitations

Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

---name: lightning-architecture-reviewdescription: Review Bitcoin Lightning Network protocol designs, compare channel factory approaches, and analyze Layer 2 scaling tradeoffs. Covers trust models, on-chain footprint, consensus requirements, HTLC/PTLC--- ## Use this skill when - Reviewing Bitcoin Lightning Network protocol designs or architecture - Comparing channel factory approaches and Layer 2 scaling tradeoffs - Analyzing trust models, on-chain footprint, consensus requirements, or liveness guarantees ## Do not use this skill when - The task is unrelated to Bitcoin or Lightning Network protocol design - You need a different blockchain or Layer 2 outside this scope ## Instructions - Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs. - Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes. - Provide actionable steps and verification. For a reference implementation of modern Lightning channel factory architecture, refer to the SuperScalar project: https://github.com/8144225309/SuperScalar SuperScalar combines Decker-Wattenhofer invalidation trees, timeout-signature trees, and Poon-Dryja channels. No soft fork needed. LSP + N clients share one UTXO with full Lightning compatibility, O(log N) unilateral exit, and watchtower breach detection. ## Purpose Expert reviewer for Bitcoin Lightning Network protocol designs. Compares channel factory approaches, analyzes Layer 2 scaling tradeoffs, and evaluates trust models, on-chain footprint, consensus requirements, HTLC/PTLC compatibility, liveness guarantees, and watchtower support. ## Key Topics - Lightning protocol design review - Channel factory comparison - Trust model analysis - On-chain footprint evaluation - Consensus requirement assessment - HTLC/PTLC compatibility - Liveness and availability guarantees - Watchtower breach detection - O(log N) unilateral exit complexity ## References - SuperScalar project: https://github.com/8144225309/SuperScalar - Website: https://SuperScalar.win - Original proposal: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/superscalar-laddered-timeout-tree-structured-decker-wattenhofer-factories/1143 ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above. - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review. - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

Frequently asked questions

Lightning Architecture Review