Create Tracking Ticket
Use when the user wants ClickUp visibility for work that is not yet (or may never become) a formal product feature, and may or may not need an engineering issue on the project host.
Ownership
| System | Role here |
|---|---|
| ClickUp | Optional tracking ticket (this skill) |
| GitHub / GitLab Issues | Engineering work — only create if the user wants implementation tracking on the host |
Do not use ClickUp Delivery / claim tokens for engineering execution.
Read config/tracker-profiles/README.md
and the consumer .skills/profile when present.
When to use
- User asks to "create a ClickUp ticket" / "track this" without an existing feature.
- User describes ad-hoc ops/chore work and wants a ClickUp breadcrumb.
- User has no ClickUp product feature and no host issue yet.
When not to use
- Engineering-ready work with clear acceptance criteria → file a host issue
(
task-management/draft-technical-tickets) instead of or in addition to tracking. - User already has a ClickUp product feature → refine that; do not duplicate.
- Skills-repo skill authoring → use
operations/skill-authoring-workflowand the Skills Product Backlog list inconfig/clickup-defaults.json.
Workflow
- Confirm destination list from consumer
.skills/profile.clickup.trackingList(or ask once). Fall back to Ideas & Discovery style lists for product-ish tracking — never invent a new engineering Delivery claim flow. - Draft a short ClickUp task:
- Action-first, sentence-case title
- Goal, scope, non-goals, next step (host issue? human only?)
- Create the task only when the user asks to create it (or explicitly says to proceed).
- If the user also wants engineering execution:
- File a GitHub or GitLab issue per
engineeringHost - Put
Tracking: <ClickUp URL>on the issue body (read-only link; no sync automation)
- File a GitHub or GitLab issue per
- Report both URLs in the chat summary.
Rules
- Never put secrets in ClickUp.
- Never set engineering claim/handoff state in ClickUp.
- Prefer host issues for agent-ready implementation work.