Txt Swiftui Texteditor

SwiftUI TextEditor Rich Text (iOS 26+)

Authored against iOS 26.x / Swift 6.x / Xcode 26.x.

The iOS 26 SwiftUI rich-text APIs are a first-generation surface and the type names, member signatures, and behavior are still in flux across Xcode point releases. Before claiming any specific signature for AttributedTextSelection, AttributedTextFormattingDefinition, AttributedTextValueConstraint, FontResolutionContext, or transformAttributes(in:body:), fetch the current Apple docs via Sosumi (sosumi.ai/documentation/swiftui/<symbol>). The patterns below describe the model; the exact type members may have shifted since this skill was authored. Verify before quoting.

This skill covers what TextEditor can and cannot do as a rich-text editor, and how to build with the new selection and formatting types when it can. It does not cover plain-text TextEditor (any iOS version), UIViewRepresentable wrappers (which remain the right answer for many production rich-text needs), or Writing Tools delegate integration. The default assumption for production code on iOS 26 is still that a wrapped UITextView is more capable; pick TextEditor when the requirement set fits.

Contents

• What changed in iOS 26
• Selection-aware formatting
• Formatting constraints
• Programmatic selection editing
• What TextEditor cannot do
• Migrating from a UITextView wrapper
• Common mistakes
• References

What changed in iOS 26

TextEditor on iOS 26 accepts a binding to AttributedString, not just String. Switching the binding type enables real rich-text editing in pure SwiftUI:

struct RichEditor: View {
    @State private var text = AttributedString("Edit this text…")

    var body: some View {
        TextEditor(text: $text)
    }
}

That single change brings in:

• Bold, italic, underline, strikethrough — including the Cmd+B / Cmd+I / Cmd+U keyboard shortcuts.
• Format menu items (the standard system menu).
• Genmoji insertion from the emoji keyboard.
• AttributedString properties like alignment, lineHeight, and writingDirection work directly on the bound content.

Five new types support custom formatting UI:

Verify the exact signatures via Sosumi before writing against them. The API shape is consistent with what's described here at the time of authoring, but type members are the most likely thing to change in point releases.

Selection-aware formatting

The toolbar pattern uses AttributedTextSelection plus transformAttributes(in:body:) to mutate the selected range:

struct FormattedEditor: View {
    @State private var text = AttributedString("Select text to format")
    @State private var selection = AttributedTextSelection()

    @Environment(\.fontResolutionContext) private var fontResolutionContext

    var body: some View {
        VStack {
            TextEditor(text: $text, selection: $selection)

            HStack {
                Button(action: toggleBold) { Image(systemName: "bold") }
                Button(action: toggleItalic) { Image(systemName: "italic") }
                Button(action: toggleUnderline) { Image(systemName: "underline") }
            }
        }
    }

    private func toggleBold() {
        text.transformAttributes(in: &selection) {
            let font = $0.font ?? .default
            let resolved = font.resolve(in: fontResolutionContext)
            $0.font = font.bold(!resolved.isBold)
        }
    }

    private func toggleItalic() {
        text.transformAttributes(in: &selection) {
            let font = $0.font ?? .default
            let resolved = font.resolve(in: fontResolutionContext)
            $0.font = font.italic(!resolved.isItalic)
        }
    }

    private func toggleUnderline() {
        text.transformAttributes(in: &selection) {
            $0.underlineStyle = $0.underlineStyle == nil ? .single : nil
        }
    }
}

Two things are worth noting. First, Font is semantic — .body, .title, etc. To check whether the selection is currently bold or italic, you have to resolve the semantic font into concrete traits via font.resolve(in: fontResolutionContext). Without that resolution, you can't tell what the user is actually seeing. Read fontResolutionContext from the environment.

Second, transformAttributes(in:body:) takes the selection by inout because mutation can shift selection bounds. The closure receives a mutable view of the run's attributes; setting $0.font or $0.underlineStyle applies across the selection.

For attributes that don't depend on resolution (alignment, line height, foreground color), the resolution step isn't needed:

text.transformAttributes(in: &selection) {
    $0.foregroundColor = .red
}

Formatting constraints

AttributedTextFormattingDefinition lets the editor declare which attributes are allowed and how their values are constrained. This is where TextEditor diverges from a "free-form attributed editor" — instead of accepting any attribute, it asks the formatting definition whether each potential change is valid.

The shape is a protocol you conform to. The conforming type pins a Scope (typically AttributeScopes.SwiftUIAttributes) and supplies one or more AttributedTextValueConstraint types — each constraint is itself an AttributedTextFormattingDefinition-conforming type that nominates an AttributeKey and implements constrain(_ container: inout Attributes) to mutate an attribute container in place. AttributedTextValueConstraint is Hashable and Sendable. The protocol is the right tool when the editor needs to enforce a style guide ("only headings 1-3," "no custom fonts," "single underline only"). For a fully free-form editor, omit the definition.

Attach the definition to the editor with the .attributedTextFormattingDefinition(_:) modifier. It takes an instance (not a metatype):

TextEditor(text: $text, selection: $selection)
    .attributedTextFormattingDefinition(MyFormatting())

The exact protocol requirements and constraint APIs have shifted across iOS 26 betas. Before writing a real conformance, fetch https://sosumi.ai/documentation/swiftui/attributedtextformattingdefinition and https://sosumi.ai/documentation/swiftui/attributedtextvalueconstraint and follow the current associated-type and method requirements verbatim — the surface is small, but signatures change between point releases.

When a constraint needs to inspect a SwiftUI Font, resolve it through the environment's fontResolutionContext (a Font.Context) before reading weight/size/design — Font.resolve(in:) is the only public path to a Font.Resolved. Calling resolve() with no argument does not compile.

Programmatic selection editing

The new APIs let SwiftUI code drive the selection without dropping to UIKit:

// Replace the selected characters with plain text
text.replaceSelection(&selection, withCharacters: "replacement")

// Replace with attributed content
let styled = AttributedString("styled replacement")
text.replaceSelection(&selection, with: styled)

// Read the current selection's range information
let indices = selection.indices(in: text)

These work without involving a coordinator, delegate, or representable. For inserting templated content (date stamps, mentions, emoji, code blocks), replaceSelection is the path.

AttributedString itself gained block-level properties on iOS 26:

text.alignment = .center
text.lineHeight = .exact(points: 32)        // exact point height
text.lineHeight = .multiple(factor: 1.5)    // multiplier
text.lineHeight = .loose                    // loose preset
text.writingDirection = .rightToLeft

These apply to the entire AttributedString. To apply to a selection, scope through transformAttributes(in:body:).

What TextEditor cannot do

Everything below requires a wrapped UITextView (or another approach):

• Inline image attachments. Genmoji works. Arbitrary images do not — there is no SwiftUI equivalent of NSTextAttachment.
• Lists (bulleted, numbered) at the editor level. NSTextList lives in TextKit and is not exposed.
• Text tables. AppKit-only feature, not in TextEditor.
• Exclusion paths, multi-column layout, custom layout fragments. Anything that depends on NSTextLayoutManager access is out of scope.
• Syntax highlighting with custom rendering attributes. Limited styling is possible via attributes; full TextKit-backed highlighting is not.
• Full first-responder control. Programmatically focusing or dismissing the keyboard is less reliable than becomeFirstResponder() on a UITextView.
• Custom input accessory views. No inputAccessoryView equivalent; the SwiftUI keyboard toolbar is the substitute.
• Spell-check customization beyond UITextInputTraits defaults.
• Custom context menus on tapped text items. UITextItemInteraction-style customization is not exposed.
• Writing Tools delegate control. The default behavior is on; full coordinator integration requires UITextView.
• iOS 25 and earlier. Plain text only.

This list is the production gap. For a notes app, comment field, or simple rich-text input on iOS 26+, TextEditor is genuinely usable. For a document editor, code editor, or anything with attachments, lists, or TextKit access, a wrapped UITextView remains the correct path.

The maturity gap is also real. This is a first-generation API — edge cases in undo behavior, paste formatting, complex formatting interactions, and SwiftData persistence have surfaced through the beta cycle. Treat TextEditor's rich-text path as additive: usable when the requirements fit, not a wholesale replacement for UITextView wrappers in shipping apps.

Migrating from a UITextView wrapper

If an existing wrapper does roughly what TextEditor now does, evaluate migration before rewriting:

• List the formatting requirements. Walk through what the wrapper actually applies to the text (bold, italic, underline, alignment, line height, colors, fonts, etc.) and check each against TextEditor's capability set. Anything not in the supported list — attachments, lists, TextKit access — keeps the wrapper.
• Check the deployment target. TextEditor with AttributedString is iOS 26+. Earlier deployment floors require keeping the wrapper.
• Audit TextKit usage. Any reference to textLayoutManager, textStorage, layoutManager, or NSTextAttachment means the wrapper stays. These are not exposed through TextEditor.
• Test edge cases. Undo behavior across formatting changes, paste from rich-text source apps, VoiceOver navigation, Dynamic Type at accessibility sizes, and external-keyboard shortcuts. The new APIs cover these but the maturity is uneven.
• Keep the wrapper as fallback. Don't delete the UIViewRepresentable until the TextEditor path has shipped to production users and survived a few releases. The cost of keeping a wrapper around is low; the cost of regressing rich-text editing for users is not.

When migration succeeds, the SwiftUI side gets cleaner — no Coordinator, no updateUIView equality dance, no focus bridging. When it fails, you've learned which capability gap matters and the wrapper stays.

Common mistakes

1. Assuming TextEditor replaces UITextView in all cases. It handles common formatting on iOS 26+. It cannot do attachments, lists, TextKit access, custom input accessories, or full first-responder control. For document editors, code editors, or anything with non-trivial rich text, a wrapped UITextView is still the right answer. Pick TextEditor based on capability fit, not novelty.

2. Forgetting FontResolutionContext when checking selection state. SwiftUI fonts are semantic — .body, .headline, .system(size:). Without resolving against a context, you cannot tell whether the current selection is bold or italic. Read the context from @Environment(\.fontResolutionContext) and call font.resolve(in: context) to get concrete traits. Toolbar buttons that don't update their selected state are usually missing this resolution step.

3. Trying to embed inline images. TextEditor has no NSTextAttachment equivalent. Genmoji works because it goes through the keyboard insertion path. Arbitrary UIImages do not. If image embedding is on the requirements list, the path is a wrapped UITextView.

4. Storing AttributedString in SwiftData without custom encoding. AttributedString is Codable, but the default encoding strategy may not round-trip every attribute scope. For SwiftData persistence, custom encoding via @Attribute(.transformable) or explicit Codable configuration is usually needed. Test the round-trip before depending on it.

5. Mutating the binding outside transformAttributes(in:body:). Direct mutation of the AttributedString binding works for whole-text changes but not for selection-scoped attribute changes. The transformAttributes API is what handles selection bounds correctly across the mutation. Direct edits can leave selection in an invalid state.

6. Quoting API signatures from memory. This API surface has churned through Xcode point releases. AttributedTextValueConstraint, transformAttributes, and the formatting-definition shape have all changed at least once. Before writing against any specific signature, fetch the current Apple docs via Sosumi and confirm the type members. Skill content cannot keep up with point releases; the docs can.

References

• references/latest-apis.md — verified Apple API surface, refresh after Xcode 26.x point releases
• /skill txt-wrap-textview — UIViewRepresentable wrappers when TextEditor's limits apply
• /skill txt-view-picker — full view selection comparison including TextEditor
• /skill txt-swiftui-interop — what SwiftUI Text/TextEditor renders vs ignores
• /skill txt-attributed-string — AttributedString model and Foundation conversions
• /skill txt-writing-tools — Writing Tools coordinator integration
• SwiftUI TextEditor
• AttributedTextSelection
• AttributedTextFormattingDefinition
• AttributedString