SkillMedev Research Synthesis
Synthesis is not summary. A summary repeats what each source said; a synthesis finds the patterns across sources and says what it means. This skill turns 20+ sources into a decision-ready document.
Step 1: Capture, don't just read
As you go through each source, extract atomic notes (one idea per note):
Source: <author, title, date>
Claim: <a single finding or argument, in your own words>
Evidence: <what backs it - data, study, anecdote>
Confidence: <strong / moderate / weak>
Keep claims atomic so you can later regroup them across sources. Tag each with a topic.
Step 2: Cluster into themes
Lay all the claims out and group them by what they're about, regardless of source. Patterns emerge when ideas from different authors sit together. Name each cluster with a theme - a sentence that captures the shared insight, not just a topic word.
Theme: "Remote teams ship faster but report weaker belonging."
- [Source A] productivity up 12% remote
- [Source C] async cuts cycle time
- [Source B] belonging scores down in fully-remote orgs
Step 3: Find tensions and disagreements
The most valuable output is where sources conflict. For each tension:
- State both positions and who holds them.
- Hypothesize why they differ (different populations? definitions? time periods? incentives?).
- Note what evidence would resolve it.
Don't paper over disagreement - surfacing it is the point.
Step 4: Identify gaps
What's missing? Note:
- Questions no source answers.
- Weakly-supported claims everyone repeats (an echo, not evidence).
- Populations / contexts not studied.
Gaps tell the reader where to be cautious and where new research/work is needed.
Step 5: Write the "so what"
End every theme and the document overall with implications:
- So what? - why does this matter for the decision at hand?
- Now what? - what should we do given this? Concrete recommendations.
A synthesis that doesn't reach "so what" is just organized note-taking.
Output structure
# Synthesis: <question>
## Executive summary (the so-what, up front)
## Themes
### Theme 1 - <insight sentence>
Evidence: [sources]. So what: <...>
## Tensions & disagreements
## Gaps & open questions
## Implications & recommendations
## Source list with confidence ratings
Tips
- Synthesize across, not down - organize by theme, never source-by-source.
- Weight by quality - three weak blog posts don't outweigh one rigorous study.
- Quote sparingly; paraphrase into your shared framework.
- Show your confidence so readers can calibrate.
Anti-patterns
- A list of source summaries with a conclusion bolted on - that's not synthesis.
- Ignoring disagreement to present a tidy narrative.
- Treating volume of mentions as truth - popularity isn't evidence.
- Stopping at "what" without "so what / now what".