Code To Spec

to-spec — Reverse-Engineer Project Specification

Analyze an existing codebase and produce a structured SPEC document that captures what the project does, how it's built, and what contracts it exposes. The output is a living specification that could be used to rebuild the project from scratch or onboard new contributors.

When to Use

• You want a comprehensive understanding of an existing project
• Onboarding new team members who need a high-level overview
• Documenting a project that was built without a spec
• Comparing actual implementation against intended design
• Preparing for a rewrite or major refactor
• Auditing what a project actually does vs. what people think it does

The Job

1. Scope confirmation — ask user what to analyze (entire repo, specific directory, or specific aspect)
2. Deep scan — systematically read project structure, entry points, config, tests, and core logic
3. Synthesize — produce a structured SPEC document
4. Review — present to user for feedback and iteration
5. Save — write final SPEC to agreed location

Step 1: Scope Confirmation

Before scanning, ask the user:

What should I analyze?

A. Entire repository (recommended for small-medium projects)
B. Specific directory or module: [path]
C. Specific aspect only (e.g., API surface, data model, auth flow)

Depth level:
1. Overview — high-level architecture + tech stack + key features (fast, ~5 min)
2. Standard — includes API contracts, data models, config, dependencies (default)
3. Deep — adds internal module interactions, error handling patterns, test coverage analysis

If the project is large (>500 files), recommend starting with Overview or a specific module.

Step 2: Deep Scan

Systematically analyze the following (adapt to what exists):

2.1 Project Identity

• package.json, go.mod, Cargo.toml, pyproject.toml, pom.xml, etc.
• README, LICENSE
• Git history (first commit date, recent activity, contributor count)

2.2 Architecture

• Directory structure and organization pattern (monorepo, layered, hexagonal, etc.)
• Entry points (main files, CLI commands, server bootstrap)
• Module boundaries and dependency graph (internal)

2.3 Tech Stack

• Language(s) and version constraints
• Frameworks and major libraries
• Build tools and bundlers
• Runtime requirements (Node version, Docker, etc.)

2.4 Features & Behavior

• Route definitions / CLI commands / exported functions
• Business logic modules and their responsibilities
• Background jobs, cron tasks, event handlers

2.5 Data Model

• Database schemas, migrations, ORMs
• Key data structures and their relationships
• State management approach

2.6 API Surface

• HTTP endpoints (method, path, request/response shapes)
• GraphQL schema / gRPC protos / WebSocket events
• CLI interface (commands, flags, arguments)
• Exported library API (public functions, classes, types)

2.7 Configuration & Environment

• Environment variables and their purpose
• Config files and their schema
• Feature flags, toggles

2.8 External Dependencies

• Third-party services (databases, queues, APIs)
• Infrastructure requirements (cloud services, storage)
• Authentication/authorization providers

2.9 Testing & Quality

• Test framework and approach (unit, integration, e2e)
• Coverage patterns (what's tested, what's not)
• Linting, formatting, type checking setup

2.10 Deployment & Operations

• CI/CD configuration
• Deployment targets and strategies
• Monitoring, logging, health checks

Step 3: SPEC Document Structure

Generate the SPEC with these sections. Omit sections that don't apply.

# SPEC: [Project Name]

> Reverse-engineered specification — generated [date] from commit [short-hash]

## 1. Overview

### 1.1 Purpose
[One paragraph: what problem this project solves and for whom]

### 1.2 Key Capabilities
- [Bullet list of what the system can do, from a user's perspective]

### 1.3 Architecture Style
[e.g., "Monolithic Express.js API with React SPA frontend", "CLI tool with plugin system", "Microservices communicating over gRPC"]

---

## 2. Tech Stack

| Layer | Technology | Version |
|-------|-----------|---------|
| Language | ... | ... |
| Framework | ... | ... |
| Database | ... | ... |
| Build | ... | ... |
| Test | ... | ... |
| Deploy | ... | ... |

---

## 3. Project Structure

[Directory tree with annotations explaining each top-level directory's purpose]

---

## 4. Data Model

### 4.1 Core Entities
[For each entity: name, fields, relationships, constraints]

### 4.2 State Transitions
[If applicable: lifecycle states and valid transitions]

---

## 5. API Surface

### 5.1 [Interface Type: REST / CLI / Library / etc.]

[For each endpoint/command/function:]
| Method | Path/Command | Description | Auth |
|--------|-------------|-------------|------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

### 5.2 Request/Response Schemas
[Key request/response shapes with field types]

---

## 6. Configuration

| Variable / Key | Required | Default | Description |
|---------------|----------|---------|-------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

---

## 7. External Dependencies

| Service | Purpose | Failure Impact |
|---------|---------|----------------|
| ... | ... | ... |

---

## 8. Business Rules & Constraints

- [Numbered list of invariants, validation rules, and business logic constraints discovered in the code]

---

## 9. Non-Functional Characteristics

### 9.1 Performance
[Observed patterns: caching, pagination, batch processing, etc.]

### 9.2 Security
[Auth mechanism, input validation patterns, secrets management]

### 9.3 Error Handling
[Error strategy: custom error types, error codes, retry policies]

---

## 10. Testing Strategy

| Type | Framework | Coverage Pattern |
|------|-----------|-----------------|
| Unit | ... | ... |
| Integration | ... | ... |
| E2E | ... | ... |

---

## 11. Known Gaps & Assumptions

- [Things that are unclear from the code alone]
- [Assumptions made during analysis]
- [Areas with no tests or documentation]

---

## 12. Appendix

### A. Dependency Graph
[Key module dependencies, import relationships]

### B. Environment Setup
[Steps to run the project locally, derived from config and scripts]

Step 4: Review & Iteration

After generating the SPEC, present it and ask:

SPEC generated. Please review:

- Are there sections that need more detail?
- Are there inaccuracies I should correct?
- Should I add/remove any sections?
- Is the depth level appropriate?

Reply OK to save, or provide feedback for iteration.

Apply feedback and re-present until user confirms.

Step 5: Save

Ask user for save location:

Where should I save the SPEC?

A. docs/SPEC.md (recommended)
B. SPEC.md (project root)
C. Custom path: [specify]

Analysis Heuristics

Identifying Purpose

• Look at README first line, package description field, CLI help text
• Check the main entry point — what does it bootstrap?
• Look at test descriptions — they often describe expected behavior in plain language

Discovering Architecture

• Map import/require statements to build dependency graph
• Identify layers by directory naming: controllers, services, models, routes, handlers, domain, infra
• Check for dependency injection patterns, middleware chains, plugin registrations

Extracting Business Rules

• Look for validation functions, guard clauses, assertion statements
• Check error messages — they often describe what went wrong in business terms
• Examine test assertions — they encode expected behavior

Finding API Contracts

• Route registrations (Express: app.get(), FastAPI: @app.get(), Go: mux.HandleFunc())
• OpenAPI/Swagger files if present
• Request validation schemas (Joi, Zod, Pydantic, struct tags)
• CLI flag/argument definitions (cobra, argparse, yargs)

Detecting Data Models

• ORM model definitions (Prisma, SQLAlchemy, GORM, TypeORM)
• Migration files (in chronological order)
• Type/interface definitions for core domain objects
• Database seed files

Edge Cases

Quality Criteria

A good reverse-engineered SPEC should pass these checks:

• A developer unfamiliar with the project could understand its purpose in 60 seconds
• The tech stack section is complete enough to set up a dev environment
• API contracts are specific enough to write a client against
• Data models are complete enough to recreate the schema
• Business rules are explicit (not buried in "see code")
• Known gaps are honestly listed (don't invent what you can't determine)
• The SPEC matches the actual code (not aspirational documentation)

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

• Don't invent intent. If you can't determine WHY something exists, say so. Don't fabricate rationale.
• Don't copy code into the SPEC. Describe behavior and contracts, don't paste implementations.
• Don't include transient state. The SPEC describes the system's design, not its current runtime state.
• Don't over-specify internals. Focus on boundaries, contracts, and behavior. Internal implementation details belong in code comments, not specs.
• Don't assume the README is accurate. READMEs often lag behind code. Verify claims against actual implementation.