Github Pr

GitHub PR Writing

Write PR descriptions that fellow devs actually want to read.

Anti-patterns (what LLMs typically produce)

• Flat bullet lists of every file changed
• Implementation-detail dumps ("added foo parameter to bar function")
• Generic titles like "Update configuration" or "Fix bug in module"
• "## Changes" / "## Testing" / "## Summary" boilerplate headers
• Restating the diff in English

What to write instead

Title: Short, specific, interesting. Convey what changed from a user/dev perspective, not which files were touched. Use imperative mood. Under 70 chars.

Body: Write in paragraphs, not bullet lists. Structure:

1. Opening paragraph — What this PR does and why, in 2-3 sentences. Bold the key behavioral change. If there's a motivating problem, state it directly.

2. Details paragraph(s) — Only if the approach is non-obvious or has trade-offs worth calling out. Use italics for subtle points. Keep it high-level; reviewers can read the diff for implementation details.

3. Anything notable — Breaking changes, migration steps, or things reviewers should pay attention to. Only if applicable. Use > blockquote for callouts.

Style rules

• Write for a dev skimming their PR feed — they should get the gist in 5 seconds
• Bold the most important phrase in each paragraph
• Italics for nuance, caveats, secondary points
• No bullet lists unless listing 3+ discrete items that genuinely aren't a narrative
• No "## Summary" or "## Changes" headers — just write
• No filler: "This PR...", "In this change...", "As part of..." — start with the substance
• Link to issues/discussions where relevant (Closes #123, See #456)
• If the PR is trivial (typo fix, version bump), a one-liner body is fine

Try it locally

If the repo is a Nix flake and the PR branch contains a buildable output (package, NixOS config, etc.), include a "Try it locally" section at the end of the body. Use the GitHub owner/repo and branch name to construct the command:

### Try it locally
`nix run github:<owner>/<repo>/<branch>`

Adjust the command as needed — nix build for non-runnable outputs, add #<output> if the default package isn't the relevant one. Omit this section entirely if the change isn't meaningfully testable via nix run/build (e.g., CI-only changes, documentation, non-Nix repos).

Updating existing PRs

When the user pushes further changes to an already-PR'd branch:

1. Check if the PR title/description still accurately reflects the full scope
2. If new commits meaningfully change what the PR does, update the title and/or body via gh pr edit
3. Don't rewrite from scratch — amend the existing description to cover new ground
4. Add a brief note about what changed if the scope expanded significantly

Examples

Bad (typical LLM output)

Title: Update NixOS configuration and add new service

## Summary
- Added `kolu` service configuration
- Updated `flake.lock`
- Modified port from 8080 to 8090
- Added health check endpoint
- Updated README

## Testing
- Tested locally

Good

Title: Add kolu service with health monitoring

**Kolu now runs as a standalone NixOS service** with its own systemd
unit and a dedicated health-check endpoint. Previously it was bolted
onto the main app process, which made restarts disruptive.

The service binds to port 8090 to avoid clashing with the dev server.
*Health checks hit `/healthz` every 30s — systemd restarts the
service on three consecutive failures.*