stardustai CEO Mail Review
Load ceo-mail-review for mail review, thread resolution, linked-material
inspection, reply judgment, and authorized reply proposals.
Compose Operation Skills
Use the platform's mail and material Skills instead of copying their commands into this business workflow.
| Source | Operation Skills |
|---|---|
| DingTalk mail | dingtalk-mail |
| Lark mail | lark-mail |
| DingTalk linked material | dingtalk-doc, dingtalk-aitable, or dingtalk-drive |
| Lark linked material | lark-doc, lark-base, or lark-drive |
Load ceo-document-review when the requested outcome includes a substantive
review of linked material. Load the matching chat Skill only when the result
must also be delivered in the source conversation.
Resolve Complete Evidence
- Treat a truncated card or quoted preview only as a locator. Resolve the principal's mailbox and the complete original message or thread with the loaded mail Skill.
- Confirm sender, recipients, subject, current thread state, and the exact request. Do not ask the sender to paste content that the loaded mail Skill can read.
- Inspect every linked material needed for the requested judgment with its matching operation Skill. A link title or mail summary is not its content.
- Check the current thread, sent state, and safe prior receipts before proposing a reply. Do not propose or execute a duplicate reply.
The agent performs the business judgment. The service supplies references and exact commands without interpreting mail or linked content. Use supplied exact commands as given and load operation Skills for any additional reads or writes. Do not infer or invent unread content.
Authorization And Outcome
Propose a mail reply only when the current request explicitly authorizes replying. Review-only, summarize-only, or approval-only requests do not authorize a mail reply. Authorization from an older message does not silently carry into a materially different current request.
- A justified mail reply is one action in a canonical
proposal; the mail operation Skill owns execution and exact readback. - If the complete current thread shows an equivalent reply already sent, use
canonical
no_actionfor the mail effect and report the verified state only when the current conversation needs it. - If review is complete but reply authorization is absent, provide only the requested review or draft through an authorized channel; do not execute or propose a mail send.
- If evidence access fails, report the dependency failure rather than drafting from the preview.
When a participant can resolve a genuine evidence gap, ask one concrete question naming the specifically missing mail or linked material. Do not ask for a generic resend or for content the loaded operation Skills can retrieve.