Visual review
Provide a specific, prioritized critique of a visual artifact without claiming
an independent reviewer was used when the managed transport cannot carry the
image.
Current availability boundary
The public coordinator protocol accepts bounded UTF-8 prompts, text documents,
and exact text artifact snapshots. It has no image, media-type, or binary
attachment field. Therefore managed cross-family visual review is
temporarily unavailable in this release.
Never:
- encode image bytes into a text document or prompt;
- pass a local path and assume the native runtime will read it;
- add an undocumented coordinator field;
- discover or invoke a provider CLI directly;
- describe a primary-only read as independent or cross-family.
If the workflow requires governance-grade reviewer independence, return typed
unavailable and state that a signed typed image contract is required.
Workflow
- Inspect the image using the active host's native visual capability. When any region is
detail-bound — small text, dense charts, closely spaced lines, fine UI
detail — magnify it before reading: use the host's native zoom or crop
actions, or a code-execution crop from the full-resolution source. A
full-view-only read of sub-patch detail is unreliable and tends to fail
confidently rather than uncertainly.
- State once that this is a primary-only visual read and is not an independent
cross-family review.
- Select one or two lenses that match the user's request: hierarchy and flow,
readability, information density, consistency, accessibility, brand and
tone, or comparative judgment.
- Return the top three findings ranked by severity. For each, name the exact
element, the problem, and one concrete fix.
- For a comparison, pick one winner against the user's stated criteria and
name one element worth borrowing from the other variant.
When only OCR text, alt text, or a user-authored textual description is in
scope, that text may be reviewed through an advisory route. Label the result a
textual-description review, not a visual review.
Output
Use this compact form:
Availability: PRIMARY-ONLY | MANAGED VISUAL REVIEW UNAVAILABLE
1. [Critical|High|Medium] <element and issue> — Fix: <concrete fix>
2. [Critical|High|Medium] <element and issue> — Fix: <concrete fix>
3. [Critical|High|Medium] <element and issue> — Fix: <concrete fix>
Avoid generic praise, unsupported pixel measurements, invented contrast
ratios, or claims about image details the active primary cannot actually see.
1---2name: visual-review3description: Review a screenshot, mockup, slide, chart, diagram, photograph, or marketing asset for hierarchy, readability, density, consistency, accessibility, and brand fit. Use when the user says "review this design," "look at this screenshot," "design feedback," "accessibility review," "is this on-brand," or "compare these variants," or when a visual artifact is about to ship. The unified plugin currently has no managed cross-family image transport, so this skill provides an honest primary-only visual pass or reports independent visual review unavailable; it never fabricates a verifier call.4---56# Visual review78Provide a specific, prioritized critique of a visual artifact without claiming9an independent reviewer was used when the managed transport cannot carry the10image.1112## Current availability boundary1314The public coordinator protocol accepts bounded UTF-8 prompts, text documents,15and exact text artifact snapshots. It has no image, media-type, or binary16attachment field. Therefore managed cross-family visual review is17**temporarily unavailable** in this release.1819Never:2021- encode image bytes into a text document or prompt;22- pass a local path and assume the native runtime will read it;23- add an undocumented coordinator field;24- discover or invoke a provider CLI directly;25- describe a primary-only read as independent or cross-family.2627If the workflow requires governance-grade reviewer independence, return typed28unavailable and state that a signed typed image contract is required.2930## Workflow31321. Inspect the image using the active host's native visual capability. When any region is33 detail-bound — small text, dense charts, closely spaced lines, fine UI34 detail — magnify it before reading: use the host's native zoom or crop35 actions, or a code-execution crop from the full-resolution source. A36 full-view-only read of sub-patch detail is unreliable and tends to fail37 confidently rather than uncertainly.382. State once that this is a primary-only visual read and is not an independent39 cross-family review.403. Select one or two lenses that match the user's request: hierarchy and flow,41 readability, information density, consistency, accessibility, brand and42 tone, or comparative judgment.434. Return the top three findings ranked by severity. For each, name the exact44 element, the problem, and one concrete fix.455. For a comparison, pick one winner against the user's stated criteria and46 name one element worth borrowing from the other variant.4748When only OCR text, alt text, or a user-authored textual description is in49scope, that text may be reviewed through an advisory route. Label the result a50**textual-description review**, not a visual review.5152## Output5354Use this compact form:5556```text57Availability: PRIMARY-ONLY | MANAGED VISUAL REVIEW UNAVAILABLE581. [Critical|High|Medium] <element and issue> — Fix: <concrete fix>592. [Critical|High|Medium] <element and issue> — Fix: <concrete fix>603. [Critical|High|Medium] <element and issue> — Fix: <concrete fix>61```6263Avoid generic praise, unsupported pixel measurements, invented contrast64ratios, or claims about image details the active primary cannot actually see.
sumitake