superxi-s Change Request Review
Purpose and use
Explain an already selected change request after subject and validation facts are available. Do not use for execution, approval, or creating a request.
Inputs and workflow
Inputs are a principal, versioned subject, runtime and validator facts, and optional raw evidence. Read authoritative facts first; compare the proposed and baseline state; filter raw evidence into trusted evidence; then return findings and an explanation. Unsupported domain or identifier claims are INSUFFICIENT and have no citation.
Authority, capabilities, and approval
Runtime, validator, and policy facts outrank evidence and generated prose. This pack is read/review-only, has no direct-write capability, and cannot replace approval or the risk gate.
Outputs, failures, and edge cases
Return structured findings, a review explanation, trusted citations, and a trace. Missing authority, stale subject versions, or evidence without support must fail closed or abstain. Example: “review change CR-42 against its baseline”; not “execute CR-42”.