synapseradio Follow these steps:
1. Identify the opposing positions
Target: $ARGUMENTS, else the thesis and antithesis in the current context.
2. State the thesis clearly
Its core arguments, what it explains well, its strengths and appeal.
3. Develop the antithesis
Present it as a genuine alternative, not mere negation: its own arguments, what it explains well, what it reveals that the thesis missed.
4. Examine the conflict
Where exactly do they contradict? What does each get right or miss? Are they answering different questions or operating on different assumptions?
5. Identify the deeper truth
What higher-level understanding resolves the contradiction? Is it a false dichotomy? Are both partially right in different contexts? What does the conflict itself reveal?
6. Construct the synthesis
Build a new position that incorporates insights from both, transcends the either/or framing, and explains what neither alone could.
7. Test the synthesis
Does it account for what each side got right and resolve the original conflict? What new tensions or questions does it create?