Clinical Decision Support Documents
Description
Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers, and medical decision-makers. This skill specializes in analytical, evidence-based documents that inform treatment strategies and drug development:
- Patient Cohort Analysis - Biomarker-stratified group analyses with statistical outcome comparisons
- Treatment Recommendation Reports - Evidence-based clinical guidelines with GRADE grading and decision algorithms
All documents are generated as publication-ready LaTeX/PDF files optimized for pharmaceutical research, regulatory submissions, and clinical guideline development.
Note: For individual patient treatment plans at the bedside, use the treatment-plans skill instead. This skill focuses on group-level analyses and evidence synthesis for pharmaceutical/research settings.
Writing Style: For publication-ready documents targeting medical journals, consult the venue-templates skill's medical_journal_styles.md for guidance on structured abstracts, evidence language, and CONSORT/STROBE compliance.
Capabilities
Document Types
Patient Cohort Analysis
- Biomarker-based patient stratification (molecular subtypes, gene expression, IHC)
- Molecular subtype classification (e.g., GBM mesenchymal-immune-active vs proneural, breast cancer subtypes)
- Outcome metrics with statistical analysis (OS, PFS, ORR, DOR, DCR)
- Statistical comparisons between subgroups (hazard ratios, p-values, 95% CI)
- Survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests
- Efficacy tables and waterfall plots
- Comparative effectiveness analyses
- Pharmaceutical cohort reporting (trial subgroups, real-world evidence)
Treatment Recommendation Reports
- Evidence-based treatment guidelines for specific disease states
- Strength of recommendation grading (GRADE system: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)
- Quality of evidence assessment (high, moderate, low, very low)
- Treatment algorithm flowcharts with TikZ diagrams
- Line-of-therapy sequencing based on biomarkers
- Decision pathways with clinical and molecular criteria
- Pharmaceutical strategy documents
- Clinical guideline development for medical societies
Clinical Features
- Biomarker Integration: Genomic alterations (mutations, CNV, fusions), gene expression signatures, IHC markers, PD-L1 scoring
- Statistical Analysis: Hazard ratios, p-values, confidence intervals, survival curves, Cox regression, log-rank tests
- Evidence Grading: GRADE system (1A/1B/2A/2B/2C), Oxford CEBM levels, quality of evidence assessment
- Clinical Terminology: SNOMED-CT, LOINC, proper medical nomenclature, trial nomenclature
- Regulatory Compliance: HIPAA de-identification, confidentiality headers, ICH-GCP alignment
- Professional Formatting: Compact 0.5in margins, color-coded recommendations, publication-ready, suitable for regulatory submissions
Pharmaceutical and Research Use Cases
This skill is specifically designed for pharmaceutical and clinical research applications:
Drug Development
- Phase 2/3 Trial Analyses: Biomarker-stratified efficacy and safety analyses
- Subgroup Analyses: Forest plots showing treatment effects across patient subgroups
- Companion Diagnostic Development: Linking biomarkers to drug response
- Regulatory Submissions: IND/NDA documentation with evidence summaries
Medical Affairs
- KOL Education Materials: Evidence-based treatment algorithms for thought leaders
- Medical Strategy Documents: Competitive landscape and positioning strategies
- Advisory Board Materials: Cohort analyses and treatment recommendation frameworks
- Publication Planning: Manuscript-ready analyses for peer-reviewed journals
Clinical Guidelines
- Guideline Development: Evidence synthesis with GRADE methodology for specialty societies
- Consensus Recommendations: Multi-stakeholder treatment algorithm development
- Practice Standards: Biomarker-based treatment selection criteria
- Quality Measures: Evidence-based performance metrics
Real-World Evidence
- RWE Cohort Studies: Retrospective analyses of patient cohorts from EMR data
- Comparative Effectiveness: Head-to-head treatment comparisons in real-world settings
- Outcomes Research: Long-term survival and safety in clinical practice
- Health Economics: Cost-effectiveness analyses by biomarker subgroup
When to Use
Use this skill when you need to:
- Analyze patient cohorts stratified by biomarkers, molecular subtypes, or clinical characteristics
- Generate treatment recommendation reports with evidence grading for clinical guidelines or pharmaceutical strategies
- Compare outcomes between patient subgroups with statistical analysis (survival, response rates, hazard ratios)
- Produce pharmaceutical research documents for drug development, clinical trials, or regulatory submissions
- Develop clinical practice guidelines with GRADE evidence grading and decision algorithms
- Document biomarker-guided therapy selection at the population level (not individual patients)
- Synthesize evidence from multiple trials or real-world data sources
- Create clinical decision algorithms with flowcharts for treatment sequencing
Do NOT use this skill for:
- Individual patient treatment plans (use
treatment-plans skill)
- Bedside clinical care documentation (use
treatment-plans skill)
- Simple patient-specific treatment protocols (use
treatment-plans skill)
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
⚠️ MANDATORY: Every clinical decision support document MUST include at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.
This is not optional. Clinical decision documents require clear visual algorithms. Before finalizing any document:
- Generate at minimum ONE schematic or diagram (e.g., clinical decision algorithm, treatment pathway, or biomarker stratification tree)
- For cohort analyses: include patient flow diagram
- For treatment recommendations: include decision flowchart
How to generate figures:
- Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
How to generate schematics:
python skills/visualization/scientific-schematics/scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
When to add schematics:
- Clinical decision algorithm flowcharts
- Treatment pathway diagrams
- Biomarker stratification trees
- Patient cohort flow diagrams (CONSORT-style)
- Survival curve visualizations
- Molecular mechanism diagrams
- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization
For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics skill documentation.
Document Structure
CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: All clinical decision support documents MUST begin with a complete executive summary on page 1 that spans the entire first page before any table of contents or detailed sections.
Page 1 Executive Summary Structure
The first page of every CDS document should contain ONLY the executive summary with the following components:
Required Elements (all on page 1):
Document Title and Type
- Main title (e.g., "Biomarker-Stratified Cohort Analysis" or "Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations")
- Subtitle with disease state and focus
Report Information Box (using colored tcolorbox)
- Document type and purpose
- Date of analysis/report
- Disease state and patient population
- Author/institution (if applicable)
- Analysis framework or methodology
Key Findings Boxes (3-5 colored boxes using tcolorbox)
- Primary Results (blue box): Main efficacy/outcome findings
- Biomarker Insights (green box): Key molecular subtype findings
- Clinical Implications (yellow/orange box): Actionable treatment implications
- Statistical Summary (gray box): Hazard ratios, p-values, key statistics
- Safety Highlights (red box, if applicable): Critical adverse events or warnings
Visual Requirements:
- Use
\thispagestyle{empty} to remove page numbers from page 1
- All content must fit on page 1 (before
\newpage)
- Use colored tcolorbox environments with different colors for visual hierarchy
- Boxes should be scannable and highlight most critical information
- Use bullet points, not narrative paragraphs
- End page 1 with
\newpage before table of contents or detailed sections
Example First Page LaTeX Structure:
\maketitle
\thispagestyle{empty}
% Report Information Box
\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=blue!5!white, colframe=blue!75!black, title=Report Information]
\textbf{Document Type:} Patient Cohort Analysis\\
\textbf{Disease State:} HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer\\
\textbf{Analysis Date:} \today\\
\textbf{Population:} 60 patients, biomarker-stratified by HR status
\end{tcolorbox}
\vspace{0.3cm}
% Key Finding #1: Primary Results
\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=blue!5!white, colframe=blue!75!black, title=Primary Efficacy Results]
\begin{itemize}
\item Overall ORR: 72\% (95\% CI: 59-83\%)
\item Median PFS: 18.5 months (95\% CI: 14.2-22.8)
\item Median OS: 35.2 months (95\% CI: 28.1-NR)
\end{itemize}
\end{tcolorbox}
\vspace{0.3cm}
% Key Finding #2: Biomarker Insights
\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=green!5!white, colframe=green!75!black, title=Biomarker Stratification Findings]
\begin{itemize}
\item HR+/HER2+: ORR 68\%, median PFS 16.2 months
\item HR-/HER2+: ORR 78\%, median PFS 22.1 months
\item HR status significantly associated with outcomes (p=0.041)
\end{itemize}
\end{tcolorbox}
\vspace{0.3cm}
% Key Finding #3: Clinical Implications
\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=orange!5!white, colframe=orange!75!black, title=Clinical Recommendations]
\begin{itemize}
\item Strong efficacy observed regardless of HR status (Grade 1A)
\item HR-/HER2+ patients showed numerically superior outcomes
\item Treatment recommended for all HER2+ MBC patients
\end{itemize}
\end{tcolorbox}
\newpage
\tableofcontents % TOC on page 2
\newpage % Detailed content starts page 3
Patient Cohort Analysis (Detailed Sections - Page 3+)
- Cohort Characteristics: Demographics, baseline features, patient selection criteria
- Biomarker Stratification: Molecular subtypes, genomic alterations, IHC profiles
- Treatment Exposure: Therapies received, dosing, treatment duration by subgroup
- Outcome Analysis: Response rates (ORR, DCR), survival data (OS, PFS), DOR
- Statistical Methods: Kaplan-Meier survival curves, hazard ratios, log-rank tests, Cox regression
- Subgroup Comparisons: Biomarker-stratified efficacy, forest plots, statistical significance
- Safety Profile: Adverse events by subgroup, dose modifications, discontinuations
- Clinical Recommendations: Treatment implications based on biomarker profiles
- Figures: Waterfall plots, swimmer plots, survival curves, forest plots
- Tables: Demographics table, biomarker frequency, outcomes by subgroup
Treatment Recommendation Reports (Detailed Sections - Page 3+)
Page 1 Executive Summary for Treatment Recommendations should include:
- Report Information Box: Disease state, guideline version/date, target population
- Key Recommendations Box (green): Top 3-5 GRADE-graded recommendations by line of therapy
- Biomarker Decision Criteria Box (blue): Key molecular markers influencing treatment selection
- Evidence Summary Box (gray): Major trials supporting recommendations (e.g., KEYNOTE-189, FLAURA)
- Critical Monitoring Box (orange/red): Essential safety monitoring requirements
Detailed Sections (Page 3+):
- Clinical Context: Disease state, epidemiology, current treatment landscape
- Target Population: Patient characteristics, biomarker criteria, staging
- Evidence Review: Systematic literature synthesis, guideline summary, trial data
- Treatment Options: Available therapies with mechanism of action
- Evidence Grading: GRADE assessment for each recommendation (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)
- Recommendations by Line: First-line, second-line, subsequent therapies
- Biomarker-Guided Selection: Decision criteria based on molecular profiles
- Treatment Algorithms: TikZ flowcharts showing decision pathways
- Monitoring Protocol: Safety assessments, efficacy monitoring, dose modifications
- Special Populations: Elderly, renal/hepatic impairment, comorbidities
- References: Full bibliography with trial names and citations
Output Format
MANDATORY FIRST PAGE REQUIREMENT:
- Page 1: Full-page executive summary with 3-5 colored tcolorbox elements
- Page 2: Table of contents (optional)
- Page 3+: Detailed sections with methods, results, figures, tables
Document Specifications:
- Primary: LaTeX/PDF with 0.5in margins for compact, data-dense presentation
- Length: Typically 5-15 pages (1 page executive summary + 4-14 pages detailed content)
- Style: Publication-ready, pharmaceutical-grade, suitable for regulatory submissions
- First Page: Always a complete executive summary spanning entire page 1 (see Document Structure section)
Visual Elements:
- Colors:
- Page 1 boxes: blue=data/information, green=biomarkers/recommendations, yellow/orange=clinical implications, red=warnings
- Recommendation boxes (green=strong recommendation, yellow=conditional, blue=research needed)
- Biomarker stratification (color-coded molecular subtypes)
- Statistical significance (color-coded p-values, hazard ratios)
- Tables:
- Demographics with baseline characteristics
- Biomarker frequency by subgroup
- Outcomes table (ORR, PFS, OS, DOR by molecular subtype)
- Adverse events by cohort
- Evidence summary tables with GRADE ratings
- Figures:
- Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank p-values and number at risk tables
- Waterfall plots showing best response by patient
- Forest plots for subgroup analyses with confidence intervals
- TikZ decision algorithm flowcharts
- Swimmer plots for individual patient timelines
- Statistics: Hazard ratios with 95% CI, p-values, median survival times, landmark survival rates
- Compliance: De-identification per HIPAA Safe Harbor, confidentiality notices for proprietary data
Integration
This skill integrates with:
- scientific-writing: Citation management, statistical reporting, evidence synthesis
- clinical-reports: Medical terminology, HIPAA compliance, regulatory documentation
- scientific-schematics: TikZ flowcharts for decision algorithms and treatment pathways
- treatment-plans: Individual patient applications of cohort-derived insights (bidirectional)
Key Differentiators from Treatment-Plans Skill
Clinical Decision Support (this skill):
- Audience: Pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers, guideline committees, medical affairs
- Scope: Population-level analyses, evidence synthesis, guideline development
- Focus: Biomarker stratification, statistical comparisons, evidence grading
- Output: Multi-page analytical documents (5-15 pages typical) with extensive figures and tables
- Use Cases: Drug development, regulatory submissions, clinical practice guidelines, medical strategy
- Example: "Analyze 60 HER2+ breast cancer patients by hormone receptor status with survival outcomes"
Treatment-Plans Skill:
- Audience: Clinicians, patients, care teams
- Scope: Individual patient care planning
- Focus: SMART goals, patient-specific interventions, monitoring plans
- Output: Concise 1-4 page actionable care plans
- Use Cases: Bedside clinical care, EMR documentation, patient-centered planning
- Example: "Create treatment plan for a 55-year-old patient with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes"
When to use each:
- Use clinical-decision-support for: cohort analyses, biomarker stratification studies, treatment guideline development, pharmaceutical strategy documents
- Use treatment-plans for: individual patient care plans, treatment protocols for specific patients, bedside clinical documentation
Example Usage
Patient Cohort Analysis
Example 1: NSCLC Biomarker Stratification
> Analyze a cohort of 45 NSCLC patients stratified by PD-L1 expression (<1%, 1-49%, ≥50%)
> receiving pembrolizumab. Include outcomes: ORR, median PFS, median OS with hazard ratios
> comparing PD-L1 ≥50% vs <50%. Generate Kaplan-Meier curves and waterfall plot.
Example 2: GBM Molecular Subtype Analysis
> Generate cohort analysis for 30 GBM patients classified into Cluster 1 (Mesenchymal-Immune-Active)
> and Cluster 2 (Proneural) molecular subtypes. Compare outcomes including median OS, 6-month PFS rate,
> and response to TMZ+bevacizumab. Include biomarker profile table and statistical comparison.
Example 3: Breast Cancer HER2 Cohort
> Analyze 60 HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-deruxtecan,
> stratified by prior trastuzumab exposure (yes/no). Include ORR, DOR, median PFS with forest plot
> showing subgroup analyses by hormone receptor status, brain metastases, and number of prior lines.
Treatment Recommendation Report
Example 1: HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Guidelines
> Create evidence-based treatment recommendations for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer including
> biomarker-guided therapy selection. Use GRADE system to grade recommendations for first-line
> (trastuzumab+pertuzumab+taxane), second-line (trastuzumab-deruxtecan), and third-line options.
> Include decision algorithm flowchart based on brain metastases, hormone receptor status, and prior therapies.
Example 2: Advanced NSCLC Treatment Algorithm
> Generate treatment recommendation report for advanced NSCLC based on PD-L1 expression, EGFR mutation,
> ALK rearrangement, and performance status. Include GRADE-graded recommendations for each molecular subtype,
> TikZ flowchart for biomarker-directed therapy selection, and evidence tables from KEYNOTE-189, FLAURA,
> and CheckMate-227 trials.
Example 3: Multiple Myeloma Line-of-Therapy Sequencing
> Create treatment algorithm for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma through relapsed/refractory setting.
> Include GRADE recommendations for transplant-eligible vs ineligible, high-risk cytogenetics considerations,
> and sequencing of daratumumab, carfilzomib, and CAR-T therapy. Provide flowchart showing decision points
> at each line of therapy.
Key Features
Biomarker Classification
- Genomic: Mutations, CNV, gene fusions
- Expression: RNA-seq, IHC scores
- Molecular subtypes: Disease-specific classifications
- Clinical actionability: Therapy selection guidance
Outcome Metrics
- Survival: OS (overall survival), PFS (progression-free survival)
- Response: ORR (objective response rate), DOR (duration of response), DCR (disease control rate)
- Quality: ECOG performance status, symptom burden
- Safety: Adverse events, dose modifications
Statistical Methods
- Survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests
- Group comparisons: t-tests, chi-square, Fisher's exact
- Effect sizes: Hazard ratios, odds ratios with 95% CI
- Significance: p-values, multiple testing corrections
Evidence Grading
GRADE System
- 1A: Strong recommendation, high-quality evidence
- 1B: Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence
- 2A: Weak recommendation, high-quality evidence
- 2B: Weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence
- 2C: Weak recommendation, low-quality evidence
Recommendation Strength
- Strong: Benefits clearly outweigh risks
- Conditional: Trade-offs exist, patient values important
- Research: Insufficient evidence, clinical trials needed
Best Practices
For Cohort Analyses
- Patient Selection Transparency: Clearly document inclusion/exclusion criteria, patient flow, and reasons for exclusions
- Biomarker Clarity: Specify assay methods, platforms (e.g., FoundationOne, Caris), cut-points, and validation status
- Statistical Rigor:
- Report hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals, not just p-values
- Include median follow-up time for survival analyses
- Specify statistical tests used (log-rank, Cox regression, Fisher's exact)
- Account for multiple comparisons when appropriate
- Outcome Definitions: Use standard criteria:
- Response: RECIST 1.1, iRECIST for immunotherapy
- Adverse events: CTCAE version 5.0
- Performance status: ECOG or Karnofsky
- Survival Data Presentation:
- Median OS/PFS with 95% CI
- Landmark survival rates (6-month, 12-month, 24-month)
- Number at risk tables below Kaplan-Meier curves
- Censoring clearly indicated
- Subgroup Analyses: Pre-specify subgroups; clearly label exploratory vs pre-planned analyses
- Data Completeness: Report missing data and how it was handled
For Treatment Recommendation Reports
- Evidence Grading Transparency:
- Use GRADE system consistently (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)
- Document rationale for each grade
- Clearly state quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, very low)
- Comprehensive Evidence Review:
- Include phase 3 randomized trials as primary evidence
- Supplement with phase 2 data for emerging therapies
- Note real-world evidence and meta-analyses
- Cite trial names (e.g., KEYNOTE-189, CheckMate-227)
- Biomarker-Guided Recommendations:
- Link specific biomarkers to therapy recommendations
- Specify testing methods and validated assays
- Include FDA/EMA approval status for companion diagnostics
- Clinical Actionability: Every recommendation should have clear implementation guidance
- Decision Algorithm Clarity: TikZ flowcharts should be unambiguous with clear yes/no decision points
- Special Populations: Address elderly, renal/hepatic impairment, pregnancy, drug interactions
- Monitoring Guidance: Specify safety labs, imaging, and frequency
- Update Frequency: Date recommendations and plan for periodic updates
General Best Practices
- First Page Executive Summary (MANDATORY):
- ALWAYS create a complete executive summary on page 1 that spans the entire first page
- Use 3-5 colored tcolorbox elements to highlight key findings
- No table of contents or detailed sections on page 1
- Use
\thispagestyle{empty} and end with \newpage
- This is the single most important page - it should be scannable in 60 seconds
- De-identification: Remove all 18 HIPAA identifiers before document generation (Safe Harbor method)
- Regulatory Compliance: Include confidentiality notices for proprietary pharmaceutical data
- Publication-Ready Formatting: Use 0.5in margins, professional fonts, color-coded sections
- Reproducibility: Document all statistical methods to enable replication
- Conflict of Interest: Disclose pharmaceutical funding or relationships when applicable
- Visual Hierarchy: Use colored boxes consistently (blue=data, green=biomarkers, yellow/orange=recommendations, red=warnings)
References
See the references/ directory for detailed guidance on:
- Patient cohort analysis and stratification methods
- Treatment recommendation development
- Clinical decision algorithms
- Biomarker classification and interpretation
- Outcome analysis and statistical methods
- Evidence synthesis and grading systems
Templates
See the assets/ directory for LaTeX templates:
cohort_analysis_template.tex - Biomarker-stratified patient cohort analysis with statistical comparisons
treatment_recommendation_template.tex - Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines with GRADE grading
clinical_pathway_template.tex - TikZ decision algorithm flowcharts for treatment sequencing
biomarker_report_template.tex - Molecular subtype classification and genomic profile reports
evidence_synthesis_template.tex - Systematic evidence review and meta-analysis summaries
Template Features:
- 0.5in margins for compact presentation
- Color-coded recommendation boxes
- Professional tables for demographics, biomarkers, outcomes
- Built-in support for Kaplan-Meier curves, waterfall plots, forest plots
- GRADE evidence grading tables
- Confidentiality headers for pharmaceutical documents
Scripts
See the scripts/ directory for analysis and visualization tools:
generate_survival_analysis.py - Kaplan-Meier curve generation with log-rank tests, hazard ratios, 95% CI
create_waterfall_plot.py - Best response visualization for cohort analyses
create_forest_plot.py - Subgroup analysis visualization with confidence intervals
create_cohort_tables.py - Demographics, biomarker frequency, and outcomes tables
build_decision_tree.py - TikZ flowchart generation for treatment algorithms
biomarker_classifier.py - Patient stratification algorithms by molecular subtype
calculate_statistics.py - Hazard ratios, Cox regression, log-rank tests, Fisher's exact
validate_cds_document.py - Quality and compliance checks (HIPAA, statistical reporting standards)
grade_evidence.py - Automated GRADE assessment helper for treatment recommendations
1---2name: clinical-decision-support3description: Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.4---56# Clinical Decision Support Documents78## Description910Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers, and medical decision-makers. This skill specializes in analytical, evidence-based documents that inform treatment strategies and drug development:11121. **Patient Cohort Analysis** - Biomarker-stratified group analyses with statistical outcome comparisons132. **Treatment Recommendation Reports** - Evidence-based clinical guidelines with GRADE grading and decision algorithms1415All documents are generated as publication-ready LaTeX/PDF files optimized for pharmaceutical research, regulatory submissions, and clinical guideline development.1617**Note:** For individual patient treatment plans at the bedside, use the `treatment-plans` skill instead. This skill focuses on group-level analyses and evidence synthesis for pharmaceutical/research settings.1819**Writing Style:** For publication-ready documents targeting medical journals, consult the **venue-templates** skill's `medical_journal_styles.md` for guidance on structured abstracts, evidence language, and CONSORT/STROBE compliance.2021## Capabilities2223### Document Types2425**Patient Cohort Analysis**26- Biomarker-based patient stratification (molecular subtypes, gene expression, IHC)27- Molecular subtype classification (e.g., GBM mesenchymal-immune-active vs proneural, breast cancer subtypes)28- Outcome metrics with statistical analysis (OS, PFS, ORR, DOR, DCR)29- Statistical comparisons between subgroups (hazard ratios, p-values, 95% CI)30- Survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests31- Efficacy tables and waterfall plots32- Comparative effectiveness analyses33- Pharmaceutical cohort reporting (trial subgroups, real-world evidence)3435**Treatment Recommendation Reports**36- Evidence-based treatment guidelines for specific disease states37- Strength of recommendation grading (GRADE system: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)38- Quality of evidence assessment (high, moderate, low, very low)39- Treatment algorithm flowcharts with TikZ diagrams40- Line-of-therapy sequencing based on biomarkers41- Decision pathways with clinical and molecular criteria42- Pharmaceutical strategy documents43- Clinical guideline development for medical societies4445### Clinical Features4647- **Biomarker Integration**: Genomic alterations (mutations, CNV, fusions), gene expression signatures, IHC markers, PD-L1 scoring48- **Statistical Analysis**: Hazard ratios, p-values, confidence intervals, survival curves, Cox regression, log-rank tests49- **Evidence Grading**: GRADE system (1A/1B/2A/2B/2C), Oxford CEBM levels, quality of evidence assessment50- **Clinical Terminology**: SNOMED-CT, LOINC, proper medical nomenclature, trial nomenclature51- **Regulatory Compliance**: HIPAA de-identification, confidentiality headers, ICH-GCP alignment52- **Professional Formatting**: Compact 0.5in margins, color-coded recommendations, publication-ready, suitable for regulatory submissions5354## Pharmaceutical and Research Use Cases5556This skill is specifically designed for pharmaceutical and clinical research applications:5758**Drug Development**59- **Phase 2/3 Trial Analyses**: Biomarker-stratified efficacy and safety analyses60- **Subgroup Analyses**: Forest plots showing treatment effects across patient subgroups61- **Companion Diagnostic Development**: Linking biomarkers to drug response62- **Regulatory Submissions**: IND/NDA documentation with evidence summaries6364**Medical Affairs**65- **KOL Education Materials**: Evidence-based treatment algorithms for thought leaders66- **Medical Strategy Documents**: Competitive landscape and positioning strategies67- **Advisory Board Materials**: Cohort analyses and treatment recommendation frameworks68- **Publication Planning**: Manuscript-ready analyses for peer-reviewed journals6970**Clinical Guidelines**71- **Guideline Development**: Evidence synthesis with GRADE methodology for specialty societies72- **Consensus Recommendations**: Multi-stakeholder treatment algorithm development73- **Practice Standards**: Biomarker-based treatment selection criteria74- **Quality Measures**: Evidence-based performance metrics7576**Real-World Evidence**77- **RWE Cohort Studies**: Retrospective analyses of patient cohorts from EMR data78- **Comparative Effectiveness**: Head-to-head treatment comparisons in real-world settings79- **Outcomes Research**: Long-term survival and safety in clinical practice80- **Health Economics**: Cost-effectiveness analyses by biomarker subgroup8182## When to Use8384Use this skill when you need to:8586- **Analyze patient cohorts** stratified by biomarkers, molecular subtypes, or clinical characteristics87- **Generate treatment recommendation reports** with evidence grading for clinical guidelines or pharmaceutical strategies88- **Compare outcomes** between patient subgroups with statistical analysis (survival, response rates, hazard ratios)89- **Produce pharmaceutical research documents** for drug development, clinical trials, or regulatory submissions90- **Develop clinical practice guidelines** with GRADE evidence grading and decision algorithms91- **Document biomarker-guided therapy selection** at the population level (not individual patients)92- **Synthesize evidence** from multiple trials or real-world data sources93- **Create clinical decision algorithms** with flowcharts for treatment sequencing9495**Do NOT use this skill for:**96- Individual patient treatment plans (use `treatment-plans` skill)97- Bedside clinical care documentation (use `treatment-plans` skill)98- Simple patient-specific treatment protocols (use `treatment-plans` skill)99100## Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics101102**⚠️ MANDATORY: Every clinical decision support document MUST include at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.**103104This is not optional. Clinical decision documents require clear visual algorithms. Before finalizing any document:1051. Generate at minimum ONE schematic or diagram (e.g., clinical decision algorithm, treatment pathway, or biomarker stratification tree)1062. For cohort analyses: include patient flow diagram1073. For treatment recommendations: include decision flowchart108109**How to generate figures:**110- Use the **scientific-schematics** skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams111- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language112- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic113114**How to generate schematics:**115```bash116python skills/visualization/scientific-schematics/scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png117```118119The AI will automatically:120- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting121- Review and refine through multiple iterations122- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)123- Save outputs in the figures/ directory124125**When to add schematics:**126- Clinical decision algorithm flowcharts127- Treatment pathway diagrams128- Biomarker stratification trees129- Patient cohort flow diagrams (CONSORT-style)130- Survival curve visualizations131- Molecular mechanism diagrams132- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization133134For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics skill documentation.135136---137138## Document Structure139140**CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: All clinical decision support documents MUST begin with a complete executive summary on page 1 that spans the entire first page before any table of contents or detailed sections.**141142### Page 1 Executive Summary Structure143144The first page of every CDS document should contain ONLY the executive summary with the following components:145146**Required Elements (all on page 1):**1471. **Document Title and Type**148 - Main title (e.g., "Biomarker-Stratified Cohort Analysis" or "Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations")149 - Subtitle with disease state and focus150 1512. **Report Information Box** (using colored tcolorbox)152 - Document type and purpose153 - Date of analysis/report154 - Disease state and patient population155 - Author/institution (if applicable)156 - Analysis framework or methodology157 1583. **Key Findings Boxes** (3-5 colored boxes using tcolorbox)159 - **Primary Results** (blue box): Main efficacy/outcome findings160 - **Biomarker Insights** (green box): Key molecular subtype findings161 - **Clinical Implications** (yellow/orange box): Actionable treatment implications162 - **Statistical Summary** (gray box): Hazard ratios, p-values, key statistics163 - **Safety Highlights** (red box, if applicable): Critical adverse events or warnings164165**Visual Requirements:**166- Use `\thispagestyle{empty}` to remove page numbers from page 1167- All content must fit on page 1 (before `\newpage`)168- Use colored tcolorbox environments with different colors for visual hierarchy169- Boxes should be scannable and highlight most critical information170- Use bullet points, not narrative paragraphs171- End page 1 with `\newpage` before table of contents or detailed sections172173**Example First Page LaTeX Structure:**174```latex175\maketitle176\thispagestyle{empty}177178% Report Information Box179\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=blue!5!white, colframe=blue!75!black, title=Report Information]180\textbf{Document Type:} Patient Cohort Analysis\\181\textbf{Disease State:} HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer\\182\textbf{Analysis Date:} \today\\183\textbf{Population:} 60 patients, biomarker-stratified by HR status184\end{tcolorbox}185186\vspace{0.3cm}187188% Key Finding #1: Primary Results189\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=blue!5!white, colframe=blue!75!black, title=Primary Efficacy Results]190\begin{itemize}191 \item Overall ORR: 72\% (95\% CI: 59-83\%)192 \item Median PFS: 18.5 months (95\% CI: 14.2-22.8)193 \item Median OS: 35.2 months (95\% CI: 28.1-NR)194\end{itemize}195\end{tcolorbox}196197\vspace{0.3cm}198199% Key Finding #2: Biomarker Insights200\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=green!5!white, colframe=green!75!black, title=Biomarker Stratification Findings]201\begin{itemize}202 \item HR+/HER2+: ORR 68\%, median PFS 16.2 months203 \item HR-/HER2+: ORR 78\%, median PFS 22.1 months204 \item HR status significantly associated with outcomes (p=0.041)205\end{itemize}206\end{tcolorbox}207208\vspace{0.3cm}209210% Key Finding #3: Clinical Implications211\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=orange!5!white, colframe=orange!75!black, title=Clinical Recommendations]212\begin{itemize}213 \item Strong efficacy observed regardless of HR status (Grade 1A)214 \item HR-/HER2+ patients showed numerically superior outcomes215 \item Treatment recommended for all HER2+ MBC patients216\end{itemize}217\end{tcolorbox}218219\newpage220\tableofcontents % TOC on page 2221\newpage % Detailed content starts page 3222```223224### Patient Cohort Analysis (Detailed Sections - Page 3+)225- **Cohort Characteristics**: Demographics, baseline features, patient selection criteria226- **Biomarker Stratification**: Molecular subtypes, genomic alterations, IHC profiles227- **Treatment Exposure**: Therapies received, dosing, treatment duration by subgroup228- **Outcome Analysis**: Response rates (ORR, DCR), survival data (OS, PFS), DOR229- **Statistical Methods**: Kaplan-Meier survival curves, hazard ratios, log-rank tests, Cox regression230- **Subgroup Comparisons**: Biomarker-stratified efficacy, forest plots, statistical significance231- **Safety Profile**: Adverse events by subgroup, dose modifications, discontinuations232- **Clinical Recommendations**: Treatment implications based on biomarker profiles233- **Figures**: Waterfall plots, swimmer plots, survival curves, forest plots234- **Tables**: Demographics table, biomarker frequency, outcomes by subgroup235236### Treatment Recommendation Reports (Detailed Sections - Page 3+)237238**Page 1 Executive Summary for Treatment Recommendations should include:**2391. **Report Information Box**: Disease state, guideline version/date, target population2402. **Key Recommendations Box** (green): Top 3-5 GRADE-graded recommendations by line of therapy2413. **Biomarker Decision Criteria Box** (blue): Key molecular markers influencing treatment selection2424. **Evidence Summary Box** (gray): Major trials supporting recommendations (e.g., KEYNOTE-189, FLAURA)2435. **Critical Monitoring Box** (orange/red): Essential safety monitoring requirements244245**Detailed Sections (Page 3+):**246- **Clinical Context**: Disease state, epidemiology, current treatment landscape247- **Target Population**: Patient characteristics, biomarker criteria, staging248- **Evidence Review**: Systematic literature synthesis, guideline summary, trial data249- **Treatment Options**: Available therapies with mechanism of action250- **Evidence Grading**: GRADE assessment for each recommendation (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)251- **Recommendations by Line**: First-line, second-line, subsequent therapies252- **Biomarker-Guided Selection**: Decision criteria based on molecular profiles253- **Treatment Algorithms**: TikZ flowcharts showing decision pathways254- **Monitoring Protocol**: Safety assessments, efficacy monitoring, dose modifications255- **Special Populations**: Elderly, renal/hepatic impairment, comorbidities256- **References**: Full bibliography with trial names and citations257258## Output Format259260**MANDATORY FIRST PAGE REQUIREMENT:**261- **Page 1**: Full-page executive summary with 3-5 colored tcolorbox elements262- **Page 2**: Table of contents (optional)263- **Page 3+**: Detailed sections with methods, results, figures, tables264265**Document Specifications:**266- **Primary**: LaTeX/PDF with 0.5in margins for compact, data-dense presentation267- **Length**: Typically 5-15 pages (1 page executive summary + 4-14 pages detailed content)268- **Style**: Publication-ready, pharmaceutical-grade, suitable for regulatory submissions269- **First Page**: Always a complete executive summary spanning entire page 1 (see Document Structure section)270271**Visual Elements:**272- **Colors**: 273 - Page 1 boxes: blue=data/information, green=biomarkers/recommendations, yellow/orange=clinical implications, red=warnings274 - Recommendation boxes (green=strong recommendation, yellow=conditional, blue=research needed)275 - Biomarker stratification (color-coded molecular subtypes)276 - Statistical significance (color-coded p-values, hazard ratios)277- **Tables**: 278 - Demographics with baseline characteristics279 - Biomarker frequency by subgroup280 - Outcomes table (ORR, PFS, OS, DOR by molecular subtype)281 - Adverse events by cohort282 - Evidence summary tables with GRADE ratings283- **Figures**: 284 - Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank p-values and number at risk tables285 - Waterfall plots showing best response by patient286 - Forest plots for subgroup analyses with confidence intervals287 - TikZ decision algorithm flowcharts288 - Swimmer plots for individual patient timelines289- **Statistics**: Hazard ratios with 95% CI, p-values, median survival times, landmark survival rates290- **Compliance**: De-identification per HIPAA Safe Harbor, confidentiality notices for proprietary data291292## Integration293294This skill integrates with:295- **scientific-writing**: Citation management, statistical reporting, evidence synthesis296- **clinical-reports**: Medical terminology, HIPAA compliance, regulatory documentation297- **scientific-schematics**: TikZ flowcharts for decision algorithms and treatment pathways298- **treatment-plans**: Individual patient applications of cohort-derived insights (bidirectional)299300## Key Differentiators from Treatment-Plans Skill301302**Clinical Decision Support (this skill):**303- **Audience**: Pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers, guideline committees, medical affairs304- **Scope**: Population-level analyses, evidence synthesis, guideline development305- **Focus**: Biomarker stratification, statistical comparisons, evidence grading306- **Output**: Multi-page analytical documents (5-15 pages typical) with extensive figures and tables307- **Use Cases**: Drug development, regulatory submissions, clinical practice guidelines, medical strategy308- **Example**: "Analyze 60 HER2+ breast cancer patients by hormone receptor status with survival outcomes"309310**Treatment-Plans Skill:**311- **Audience**: Clinicians, patients, care teams312- **Scope**: Individual patient care planning313- **Focus**: SMART goals, patient-specific interventions, monitoring plans314- **Output**: Concise 1-4 page actionable care plans315- **Use Cases**: Bedside clinical care, EMR documentation, patient-centered planning316- **Example**: "Create treatment plan for a 55-year-old patient with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes"317318**When to use each:**319- Use **clinical-decision-support** for: cohort analyses, biomarker stratification studies, treatment guideline development, pharmaceutical strategy documents320- Use **treatment-plans** for: individual patient care plans, treatment protocols for specific patients, bedside clinical documentation321322## Example Usage323324### Patient Cohort Analysis325326**Example 1: NSCLC Biomarker Stratification**327```328> Analyze a cohort of 45 NSCLC patients stratified by PD-L1 expression (<1%, 1-49%, ≥50%) 329> receiving pembrolizumab. Include outcomes: ORR, median PFS, median OS with hazard ratios 330> comparing PD-L1 ≥50% vs <50%. Generate Kaplan-Meier curves and waterfall plot.331```332333**Example 2: GBM Molecular Subtype Analysis**334```335> Generate cohort analysis for 30 GBM patients classified into Cluster 1 (Mesenchymal-Immune-Active) 336> and Cluster 2 (Proneural) molecular subtypes. Compare outcomes including median OS, 6-month PFS rate, 337> and response to TMZ+bevacizumab. Include biomarker profile table and statistical comparison.338```339340**Example 3: Breast Cancer HER2 Cohort**341```342> Analyze 60 HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-deruxtecan, 343> stratified by prior trastuzumab exposure (yes/no). Include ORR, DOR, median PFS with forest plot 344> showing subgroup analyses by hormone receptor status, brain metastases, and number of prior lines.345```346347### Treatment Recommendation Report348349**Example 1: HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Guidelines**350```351> Create evidence-based treatment recommendations for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer including 352> biomarker-guided therapy selection. Use GRADE system to grade recommendations for first-line 353> (trastuzumab+pertuzumab+taxane), second-line (trastuzumab-deruxtecan), and third-line options. 354> Include decision algorithm flowchart based on brain metastases, hormone receptor status, and prior therapies.355```356357**Example 2: Advanced NSCLC Treatment Algorithm**358```359> Generate treatment recommendation report for advanced NSCLC based on PD-L1 expression, EGFR mutation, 360> ALK rearrangement, and performance status. Include GRADE-graded recommendations for each molecular subtype, 361> TikZ flowchart for biomarker-directed therapy selection, and evidence tables from KEYNOTE-189, FLAURA, 362> and CheckMate-227 trials.363```364365**Example 3: Multiple Myeloma Line-of-Therapy Sequencing**366```367> Create treatment algorithm for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma through relapsed/refractory setting. 368> Include GRADE recommendations for transplant-eligible vs ineligible, high-risk cytogenetics considerations, 369> and sequencing of daratumumab, carfilzomib, and CAR-T therapy. Provide flowchart showing decision points 370> at each line of therapy.371```372373## Key Features374375### Biomarker Classification376- Genomic: Mutations, CNV, gene fusions377- Expression: RNA-seq, IHC scores378- Molecular subtypes: Disease-specific classifications379- Clinical actionability: Therapy selection guidance380381### Outcome Metrics382- Survival: OS (overall survival), PFS (progression-free survival)383- Response: ORR (objective response rate), DOR (duration of response), DCR (disease control rate)384- Quality: ECOG performance status, symptom burden385- Safety: Adverse events, dose modifications386387### Statistical Methods388- Survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests389- Group comparisons: t-tests, chi-square, Fisher's exact390- Effect sizes: Hazard ratios, odds ratios with 95% CI391- Significance: p-values, multiple testing corrections392393### Evidence Grading394395**GRADE System**396- **1A**: Strong recommendation, high-quality evidence397- **1B**: Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence 398- **2A**: Weak recommendation, high-quality evidence399- **2B**: Weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence400- **2C**: Weak recommendation, low-quality evidence401402**Recommendation Strength**403- **Strong**: Benefits clearly outweigh risks404- **Conditional**: Trade-offs exist, patient values important405- **Research**: Insufficient evidence, clinical trials needed406407## Best Practices408409### For Cohort Analyses4104111. **Patient Selection Transparency**: Clearly document inclusion/exclusion criteria, patient flow, and reasons for exclusions4122. **Biomarker Clarity**: Specify assay methods, platforms (e.g., FoundationOne, Caris), cut-points, and validation status4133. **Statistical Rigor**: 414 - Report hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals, not just p-values415 - Include median follow-up time for survival analyses416 - Specify statistical tests used (log-rank, Cox regression, Fisher's exact)417 - Account for multiple comparisons when appropriate4184. **Outcome Definitions**: Use standard criteria:419 - Response: RECIST 1.1, iRECIST for immunotherapy420 - Adverse events: CTCAE version 5.0421 - Performance status: ECOG or Karnofsky4225. **Survival Data Presentation**:423 - Median OS/PFS with 95% CI424 - Landmark survival rates (6-month, 12-month, 24-month)425 - Number at risk tables below Kaplan-Meier curves426 - Censoring clearly indicated4276. **Subgroup Analyses**: Pre-specify subgroups; clearly label exploratory vs pre-planned analyses4287. **Data Completeness**: Report missing data and how it was handled429430### For Treatment Recommendation Reports4314321. **Evidence Grading Transparency**: 433 - Use GRADE system consistently (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)434 - Document rationale for each grade435 - Clearly state quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, very low)4362. **Comprehensive Evidence Review**: 437 - Include phase 3 randomized trials as primary evidence438 - Supplement with phase 2 data for emerging therapies439 - Note real-world evidence and meta-analyses440 - Cite trial names (e.g., KEYNOTE-189, CheckMate-227)4413. **Biomarker-Guided Recommendations**:442 - Link specific biomarkers to therapy recommendations443 - Specify testing methods and validated assays444 - Include FDA/EMA approval status for companion diagnostics4454. **Clinical Actionability**: Every recommendation should have clear implementation guidance4465. **Decision Algorithm Clarity**: TikZ flowcharts should be unambiguous with clear yes/no decision points4476. **Special Populations**: Address elderly, renal/hepatic impairment, pregnancy, drug interactions4487. **Monitoring Guidance**: Specify safety labs, imaging, and frequency4498. **Update Frequency**: Date recommendations and plan for periodic updates450451### General Best Practices4524531. **First Page Executive Summary (MANDATORY)**: 454 - ALWAYS create a complete executive summary on page 1 that spans the entire first page455 - Use 3-5 colored tcolorbox elements to highlight key findings456 - No table of contents or detailed sections on page 1457 - Use `\thispagestyle{empty}` and end with `\newpage`458 - This is the single most important page - it should be scannable in 60 seconds4592. **De-identification**: Remove all 18 HIPAA identifiers before document generation (Safe Harbor method)4603. **Regulatory Compliance**: Include confidentiality notices for proprietary pharmaceutical data4614. **Publication-Ready Formatting**: Use 0.5in margins, professional fonts, color-coded sections4625. **Reproducibility**: Document all statistical methods to enable replication4636. **Conflict of Interest**: Disclose pharmaceutical funding or relationships when applicable4647. **Visual Hierarchy**: Use colored boxes consistently (blue=data, green=biomarkers, yellow/orange=recommendations, red=warnings)465466## References467468See the `references/` directory for detailed guidance on:469- Patient cohort analysis and stratification methods470- Treatment recommendation development471- Clinical decision algorithms472- Biomarker classification and interpretation473- Outcome analysis and statistical methods474- Evidence synthesis and grading systems475476## Templates477478See the `assets/` directory for LaTeX templates:479- `cohort_analysis_template.tex` - Biomarker-stratified patient cohort analysis with statistical comparisons480- `treatment_recommendation_template.tex` - Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines with GRADE grading481- `clinical_pathway_template.tex` - TikZ decision algorithm flowcharts for treatment sequencing482- `biomarker_report_template.tex` - Molecular subtype classification and genomic profile reports483- `evidence_synthesis_template.tex` - Systematic evidence review and meta-analysis summaries484485**Template Features:**486- 0.5in margins for compact presentation487- Color-coded recommendation boxes488- Professional tables for demographics, biomarkers, outcomes489- Built-in support for Kaplan-Meier curves, waterfall plots, forest plots490- GRADE evidence grading tables491- Confidentiality headers for pharmaceutical documents492493## Scripts494495See the `scripts/` directory for analysis and visualization tools:496- `generate_survival_analysis.py` - Kaplan-Meier curve generation with log-rank tests, hazard ratios, 95% CI497- `create_waterfall_plot.py` - Best response visualization for cohort analyses498- `create_forest_plot.py` - Subgroup analysis visualization with confidence intervals499- `create_cohort_tables.py` - Demographics, biomarker frequency, and outcomes tables500- `build_decision_tree.py` - TikZ flowchart generation for treatment algorithms501- `biomarker_classifier.py` - Patient stratification algorithms by molecular subtype502- `calculate_statistics.py` - Hazard ratios, Cox regression, log-rank tests, Fisher's exact503- `validate_cds_document.py` - Quality and compliance checks (HIPAA, statistical reporting standards)504- `grade_evidence.py` - Automated GRADE assessment helper for treatment recommendations505