dev-wip-package-refer
The "consume a WIP upstream package via a sibling-relative file: dep" pattern. Lets a consumer project depend on an in-development library/framework without publishing each iteration to npm.
For the inverse — editing the upstream itself — see dev-wip-package-upstream-wt-dev.
When to reach for this pattern
Use when the upstream library is itself in active development by the same maintainer (or a tightly coordinated team) and the iteration loop matters: edit upstream → consumer sees the change immediately on next pnpm install, no publish step. Trades multi-machine setup pain for fast iteration.
Don't use it when the upstream is stable and shipped to npm — a normal versioned dep is simpler. Also don't use it for adversarial / arms-length dependencies — file: paths assume both repos live on disk under your control.
How it resolves
The consumer's package.json declares the dep with a path-style spec:
{
"dependencies": {
"@org/pkg": "file:../upstream/packages/pkg",
"@org/pkg-rt": "file:../upstream/packages/pkg-runtime"
}
}
pnpm/npm resolve file:../upstream/... against the consumer project root, so the upstream sibling is always at <consumer-root>/../upstream/. Identical on every machine as long as the sibling layout is preserved — clone the consumer at $HOME/repos/foo/consumer, the upstream at $HOME/repos/foo/upstream, and file:../upstream just works. No env-specific config.
Real example (zudo-doc):
"@takazudo/zfb": "file:../zfb/packages/zfb"
"@takazudo/zfb-adapter-cloudflare": "file:../zfb/packages/zfb-adapter-cloudflare"
"@takazudo/zfb-runtime": "file:../zfb/packages/zfb-runtime"
"@takazudo/zudo-design-token-panel": "file:../zdtp/packages/zudo-design-token-panel"
→ resolves to ../zfb/packages/zfb and ../zdtp/packages/zudo-design-token-panel.
What the consumer needs in place
For pnpm install to succeed in the consumer, the upstream sibling must:
- Exist on disk at
../upstream/(clone before installing). - Be at a known SHA so the consumer's behavior is reproducible — see "Pinning" below.
- Have any required build artifacts present. pnpm hard-copies
file:deps at install time. If the dep is "source + a built binary" (e.g. a Rust CLI shipped via the npm package), the binary must be built before the consumer installs. If the dep is "TypeScript + adist/" the dist must be built first.
If any of those are missing, the consumer's pnpm install either succeeds with broken/stale state or fails at a postinstall hook.
Pinning — single source of truth for the SHA
The consumer pins which upstream SHA it depends on. Two places to pin:
- In CI workflow env vars — e.g.
ZFB_PINNED_SHA,ZDTP_PINNED_SHAdeclared at the workflowenv:level of every workflow that runspnpm install. CI clones the upstream at that SHA before installing. This is the source of truth. - (Optional) A
framework-pins.jsonthat both CI workflows and a local bootstrap script read from. Reduces "edit 3 YAML files per bump" to "edit 1 JSON file." Use when you have more than ~2 workflow files.
Bumping the pin = the consumer adopts the upstream change. The change is reviewed and tested in CI's clean clone.
CI side — clone-then-install
The consumer's CI workflow must clone the upstream at the pinned SHA into ../upstream/ before pnpm install runs in the consumer. Shape:
env:
UPSTREAM_PINNED_SHA: <full SHA>
jobs:
build:
steps:
- name: Checkout consumer
uses: actions/checkout@v5
- name: Clone pinned upstream sibling
run: |
git clone https://github.com/<org>/<upstream-repo>.git ../upstream
git -C ../upstream checkout "$UPSTREAM_PINNED_SHA"
# OPTIONAL: build upstream artifacts here if the npm package needs them
# (Rust binary, dist/, etc.). For heavy builds, do it in a separate
# job and upload the artifact, then download it into ../upstream/ in
# each consumer job. See zudo-doc's `build-zfb` job for that pattern.
- name: Setup Node + pnpm
# ...
- name: Install consumer deps
run: pnpm install
For expensive upstream builds (Rust toolchain, large bundles), split into a dedicated build job that uploads the binary as an artifact; consumer jobs cp it into ../upstream/target/release/ before pnpm install. See zudo-doc's .github/workflows/pr-checks.yml build-zfb job for a reference shape.
Local side — bootstrap script for multi-machine setup
The brittle part of this pattern is "new machine = clone two repos in the right layout + build their artifacts before pnpm install." Solve it with a bootstrap script that does what CI does:
pnpm setup:upstream # ensure all WIP-sibling upstreams are present and built
The script:
- Reads the pinned SHA(s) from the single source of truth (CI workflow env vars or
framework-pins.json). - For each upstream:
- If
../upstream/doesn't exist →git clone <url> ../upstream, thengit checkout <SHA>. - If
../upstream/exists with a clean tree →git fetch origin && git checkout <SHA>(matches CI). - If
../upstream/exists with a dirty tree → refuse to touch it (you have in-flight upstream edits; resolve first or pass--force-checkout).
- If
- Build upstream artifacts if missing (Rust binary,
dist/, etc.). Skip if cache is fresh. - Run
pnpm installin the consumer.
The "refuse on dirty tree" rule is what prevents stomping on a parallel upstream-edit session — see dev-wip-package-upstream-wt-dev for why the upstream root is shared.
A starter Node.js skeleton (adjust to the consumer's needs):
// scripts/setup-upstream.mjs
import { execSync } from "node:child_process";
import { existsSync, readFileSync } from "node:fs";
import { resolve } from "node:path";
const projectRoot = process.cwd();
const pkg = JSON.parse(readFileSync(resolve(projectRoot, "package.json"), "utf8"));
// Discover sibling-relative file: deps and group by upstream root.
const upstreams = new Map(); // siblingDir -> { siblingPath }
for (const [name, spec] of Object.entries(pkg.dependencies ?? {})) {
if (typeof spec !== "string" || !spec.startsWith("file:..")) continue;
const siblingDir = spec.slice("file:".length).split("/")[0]; // "../upstream"
const siblingPath = resolve(projectRoot, siblingDir);
if (!upstreams.has(siblingDir)) upstreams.set(siblingDir, { siblingPath });
}
// For each upstream, load (sha, gitUrl, buildSteps) from `framework-pins.json`
// (or grep the workflow YAML) and ensure-clone-build.
// ...left to the consumer to fill in based on its specific upstreams.
Wire the script into package.json as a regular script ("setup:upstream": "node scripts/setup-upstream.mjs"). Don't run it from postinstall — that would loop. Document it as the first thing to run on a new machine.
Comparison with alternatives
| Approach | Multi-machine | Lets you edit upstream live | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|
file:../sibling + bootstrap (this pattern) |
One command per new machine | ✅ | Small |
github:org/repo#SHA git URL |
Just works on any machine; lockfile pins SHA | ⚠️ slower iteration; needs an upstream prebuilt-binary release flow if there's a non-JS artifact | Medium |
| Published npm package | Cleanest | ❌ requires npm link for upstream-edit flow |
Large; an upstream-side project of its own |
The file: pattern wins when iteration speed on upstream matters and the team can absorb the bootstrap step. The published-package pattern wins when the upstream stabilizes.
Bumping the pin
Edit the SHA in the single source of truth (CI workflow env var or framework-pins.json). Commit + push the consumer-side change. CI re-clones the upstream at the new SHA in its clean checkout and validates. Locally re-run pnpm setup:upstream to mirror the new pin if you want to test before pushing — otherwise trust CI.
For the how of preparing the new upstream SHA itself (an upstream PR, merge, watch CI green), see dev-wip-package-upstream-wt-dev.
Anti-patterns
- Don't
git checkoutrandom branches on../upstream/. That checkout is shared with every consumer usingfile:../upstream/...and with any concurrent Claude session. Use a worktree — seedev-wip-package-upstream-wt-dev. - Don't run the bootstrap from
postinstall. Postinstall already runs on everypnpm install— the bootstrap script itself runspnpm install, so wiring it as postinstall loops. - Don't commit absolute paths to
package.json.file:../upstream/...is portable;file:/home/you/repos/upstream/...is not. - Don't pin the SHA only in
pnpm-lock.yaml.file:deps point at on-disk paths, not SHAs — the lockfile is stable across pin bumps and won't help reproducibility. The SHA must live in CI env vars (orframework-pins.json).