Vis Lens Multi Compare

Compositional Layout Visualization Lens

Philosophical Mode: Compositional Primary Question: "Which layout — small multiples vs overlay — best reveals the comparison?" Focus: Small Multiples vs Overlay, Faceting Strategy (row/col), Shared-Axis Alignment, Grouped vs Stacked Bars, Factorial Interaction Plots, Panel Reading Order

Arguments

/autoskillit:vis-lens-multi-compare [context_path] [experiment_plan_path]

• context_path (optional positional arg 1) — Absolute path to a lens context file containing IV/DV tables, H0/H1 hypotheses, controlled variables, and success criteria. If provided, read this file before beginning analysis to obtain structured context. If omitted, discover context by exploring the CWD.
• experiment_plan_path (optional positional arg 2) — Absolute path to the full experiment plan. If provided, read for complete experimental methodology and design. If omitted, locate the experiment plan by exploring the CWD.

When to Use

• Designing layouts for experiments with multiple conditions, factors, or treatments
• Deciding whether to use small multiples or overlapping traces in a figure
• Planning faceted grids for factorial designs (2+ independent variables × 2+ levels)
• Evaluating whether grouped or stacked bars serve the comparison goal
• User invokes /autoskillit:vis-lens-multi-compare

Critical Constraints

NEVER:

• Modify any source code files
• Do not litter the codebase with useless comments, TODO markers, or explanatory annotations — the skill output and diagram speak for themselves
• Create files outside {{AUTOSKILLIT_TEMP}}/vis-lens-multi-compare/
• Use overlapping traces when ≥ 4 conditions are compared — prefer small multiples
• Use stacked bars for comparisons where the baseline shifts — use grouped bars instead

ALWAYS:

• Prefer small multiples over overlays when: num_conditions ≥ 5, OR data series overlap heavily, OR the comparison requires individual-panel annotation

• Apply consistent shared-axis limits across all panels in a small-multiples layout

• Enforce left-to-right, top-to-bottom panel reading order matching the experimental factor order (main factor changes columns; secondary factor changes rows)

• BEFORE creating any diagram, LOAD the /autoskillit:mermaid skill using the Skill tool — this is MANDATORY

• If the Skill tool cannot be used (disable-model-invocation) or refuses this invocation, do NOT proceed with diagram creation. Abort this step and omit the diagram from output.

• Write output to {{AUTOSKILLIT_TEMP}}/vis-lens-multi-compare/vis_spec_multi_compare_{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS}.md (relative to the current working directory)

• After writing the file, emit the structured output token as literal plain text with no markdown formatting on the token name (the adjudicator performs a regex match):

  diagram_path = /absolute/path/to/{{AUTOSKILLIT_TEMP}}/vis-lens-multi-compare/vis_spec_multi_compare_{...}.md
  

Analysis Workflow

Step 0: Parse optional arguments

If positional arg 1 (context_path) is provided and the file exists, read it to obtain IV/DV tables, H0/H1 hypotheses, controlled variables, and success criteria. If positional arg 2 (experiment_plan_path) is provided and exists, read the experiment plan for full methodology. Use this structured context as the foundation for Steps 1–4; skip the CWD exploration for these fields if the context file supplies them.

Step 1: Inventory Conditions and Factors

Scan experiment plan, context file, and codebase for:

Condition and Factor Count

• Count num_DVs (dependent variables), num_conditions (levels per factor), num_factors (IVs)
• Look for: condition lists, treatment arms, conditions = [...], groups = [...], factor tables

Series Overlap

• Assess whether plotting all conditions on a single axes would create heavy visual overlap
• Look for: overlapping confidence bands, dense line clusters, label collisions

Factorial Structure

• Detect whether the design is factorial (2+ IVs × 2+ levels each)
• Look for: interaction terms, crossed factors, factorial, grid_search

Step 2: Apply Small-Multiples vs Overlay Decision Rule

For each figure that shows multi-condition data, determine the layout strategy:

Overlay (single axes):

• ≤ 3 conditions, no label collision, primary message is aggregate trend
• Use when: the comparison is a single-axis trend, conditions are well-separated visually

Small Multiples (faceted grid):

• ≥ 4 conditions, OR heavy overlap, OR per-panel annotation needed
• OR factorial (2+ IVs × 2+ levels): always use small multiples
• Assign row_factor and col_factor explicitly

Stacked vs Grouped Bars:

• Stacked bars: only when part-to-whole is the story AND baselines are shared
• Grouped bars: when individual comparison matters more than the total

Step 3: Assign Facet Layout

For small-multiples layouts:

• Assign col_factor to the main independent variable (most levels or primary interest)
• Assign row_factor to the secondary independent variable
• Set shared x-axis and y-axis limits across all panels
• Document reading order: left-to-right (col_factor levels), top-to-bottom (row_factor levels)

Step 4: Emit yaml:figure-spec Blocks

For each figure, emit one yaml:figure-spec fenced block with facet field populated. Then LOAD /autoskillit:mermaid and create a panel-layout schematic diagram (boxes representing panel grid with row/col labels).

Output Template

# Compositional Layout Spec: {System / Experiment Name}

**Lens:** Compositional Layout (Compositional)
**Question:** Which layout — small multiples vs overlay — best reveals the comparison?
**Date:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Scope:** {What was analyzed}
**num_conditions detected:** {N}

## Layout Decision Summary

| Figure | num_conditions | num_factors | Strategy | row_factor | col_factor |
|--------|---------------|-------------|----------|------------|------------|
| {fig-01} | 6 | 2 | small-multiples | method | dataset |
| {fig-02} | 3 | 1 | overlay | — | — |

## Figure Specs

```yaml
# yaml:figure-spec — canonical schema (spec_version: "1.0")
figure_id: "fig-01-factorial-accuracy"
figure_title: "Accuracy Across Methods × Datasets"
spec_version: "1.0"
chart_type: "line"
chart_type_fallback: "grouped-bar"
perceptual_justification: "Small multiples prevent overlap; shared y-axis enables cross-panel comparison."
data_source: "results/accuracy.csv"
data_mapping:
  x: "epoch"
  y: "accuracy"
  color: "variant"
  size: ""
  facet: "col=dataset, row=method"
layout:
  width_inches: 10.0
  height_inches: 6.0
  dpi: 300
stat_overlay:
  type: "error_bar"
  measure: "CI95"
  n_seeds: 5
annotations: ["shared y-axis; panel grid: 3 cols × 2 rows"]
anti_patterns: ["ap-overplotting"]
palette: "okabe-ito"
format: "pdf"
target_dpi: 300
library: "matplotlib"
report_section: "Section 4 Results"
priority: "P1"
placement_tier: "main"
conflicts: []
metadata:
  created_by: "vis-lens-multi-compare"
  reviewed_by: ""
  last_updated: "{YYYY-MM-DD}"

Compositional Layout Diagram

%%{init: {'flowchart': {'nodeSpacing': 50, 'rankSpacing': 60, 'curve': 'basis'}}}%%
flowchart TB
    %% CLASS DEFINITIONS %%
    classDef cli fill:#1a237e,stroke:#7986cb,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef stateNode fill:#004d40,stroke:#4db6ac,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef handler fill:#e65100,stroke:#ffb74d,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef output fill:#00695c,stroke:#4db6ac,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;
    classDef detector fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef5350,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff;

    subgraph Conditions ["CONDITION COUNT"]
        C1["num_conditions = {N}<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>{factorial: yes/no}"]
    end

    subgraph Strategy ["LAYOUT STRATEGY"]
        S1["overlay / small-multiples<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>{decision rule applied}"]
    end

    subgraph Facet ["FACET ASSIGNMENT"]
        F1["col_factor = {X}<br/>row_factor = {Y}<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>shared axes: yes/no"]
    end

    subgraph Verdict ["VERDICT"]
        V1["{layout type}<br/>━━━━━━━━━━<br/>{reading order note}"]
    end

    C1 --> S1
    S1 --> F1
    F1 --> V1

    class C1 stateNode;
    class S1 cli;
    class F1 handler;
    class V1 output;

Color Legend:

---

## Pre-Diagram Checklist

Before creating the diagram, verify:

- [ ] LOADED `/autoskillit:mermaid` skill using the Skill tool
- [ ] Using ONLY classDef styles from the mermaid skill (no invented colors)
- [ ] Diagram will include a color legend table
- [ ] Every figure with ≥ 4 conditions has been assigned a small-multiples layout
- [ ] Every `yaml:figure-spec` has the `facet` field filled (or explicitly empty for overlays)