Bio Results Writing

Bioinformatics Results Writing

Use this skill for figure- and table-grounded Results prose. It reports what was observed; it does not perform analyses or interpret beyond the data.

Boundary

This skill does:

• write Results subsections and figure-by-figure paragraphs from supplied evidence
• organize results into an evidence ladder rather than raw analysis chronology
• calibrate claims by statistical support, validation, and figure status
• produce missing-information flags for incomplete figures, tables, or statistics

This skill does not:

• run DESeq2, enrichment, clustering, survival, model evaluation, or database validation
• invent FDR, p values, log fold changes, sample counts, accession IDs, panel labels, or mechanisms
• write the Discussion unless the user explicitly asks for a brief transition sentence

When to open extra files

Workflow

1. Inventory evidence units. For each figure/table, capture panel, assay, comparison, statistic, and intended message.
2. Sort by argument logic. Prefer dataset/QC -> global pattern -> focused finding -> pathway/module -> validation over tool chronology.
3. Write claim-first subsection openings. Each paragraph should start with what the result shows, then provide evidence.
4. Keep Results distinct from Discussion. State observations and immediate data-grounded meaning; avoid broad causal or translational claims.
5. Use quantitative details exactly as supplied. If details are absent, use qualitative wording and flag the missing field.
6. Check figure callouts. Every panel referenced in prose must exist in the supplied inventory.
7. Return draft plus audit table. Include unresolved evidence gaps.

Output format

Results draft
[section or paragraphs]

Figure-to-text map
| Figure/table | Written claim | Evidence used | Missing fields |
|---|---|---|---|

Overclaim / missing-stat flags
- ...

中文核对
- ...