AISTATS Supplementary
Use this when assembling AISTATS supplementary material. The supplement can support the
paper, but the main submission must remain understandable without it.
Supplement structure
- Put theorem proofs, derivations, extra ablations, simulation details, dataset
documentation, and robustness tables in a clean appendix or supplementary manuscript.
- Put executable assets in a separate archive when current OpenReview forms allow it.
- Respect the current supplementary deadline. AISTATS 2026 placed supplementary-material
submission after the paper deadline but before review.
- Keep all supplementary files double-blind: no authors, institutions, acknowledgements,
private paths, repository owners, grants, or identifying metadata.
- Do not use the supplement to hide essential motivation, core method description, main
theorem statements, or primary empirical results.
- Verify archives open on a clean machine and contain no credentials, cache directories,
large irrelevant files, or hidden OS metadata.
Appendix architecture for proofs
- Order appendix sections to mirror main-text theorem order; statistician reviewers navigate
by theorem number, not by page.
- Restate each theorem before its proof so the appendix reads standalone without flipping
back to the two-column body.
- Standard partition: notation and assumptions, main proofs, auxiliary lemmas, additional
simulations, then real-data details.
- Keep one proof-sketch paragraph per major theorem in the body itself; an AISTATS submission
whose entire argument lives in the supplement reads as unreviewable within the page limit.
- Cross-reference every appendix table and lemma from the body at least once; orphaned
supplement material is invisible to reviewers and wasted under reviewer discretion.
- If the cycle allows appendices inside the main PDF after the references, confirm against
the current instructions whether that or a separate file upload is expected.
What gets opened first
| Supplement item |
Inspection likelihood |
Practical implication |
| Proof of the headline theorem |
High |
Polish it to main-text standard |
| Extra ablation and robustness tables |
Medium |
Reference each one from the body |
| Code archive |
Variable, reviewer discretion |
The README must orient a reader in one minute |
| Raw experiment logs |
Low |
Include for completeness, never rely on them |
Vignette: splitting an optimization paper
A submission proving a convergence guarantee for a stochastic mirror-descent variant, plus
benchmark plots: the body keeps the theorem, the key lemma, the proof roadmap, and two
decision-critical figures; the appendix holds full proofs and step-size sensitivity grids;
the archive carries the seeded experiment runner. Nothing decision-critical lives only in
the archive, because archive inspection at AISTATS is discretionary.
Output format
[Supplement status] Ready / Needs fixes / Not ready
[Files] <appendix/proofs/code/data/logs>
[Deadline] <current supplement deadline and source>
[Anonymity checks] <passed/issues>
[Main-paper dependency] <what breaks if supplement is ignored>
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-supplementary/SKILL.md
1---2name: aistats-supplementary3description: Use when preparing AISTATS supplementary material, appendices, proof details, code/data archives, simulation scripts, additional tables, and anonymized artifacts under deadline, size, anonymity, and reviewer-discretion constraints, including how to split a theory-plus-experiments paper between body and supplement.4---567# AISTATS Supplementary89Use this when assembling AISTATS supplementary material. The supplement can support the10paper, but the main submission must remain understandable without it.1112## Supplement structure1314- Put theorem proofs, derivations, extra ablations, simulation details, dataset15 documentation, and robustness tables in a clean appendix or supplementary manuscript.16- Put executable assets in a separate archive when current OpenReview forms allow it.17- Respect the current supplementary deadline. AISTATS 2026 placed supplementary-material18 submission after the paper deadline but before review.19- Keep all supplementary files double-blind: no authors, institutions, acknowledgements,20 private paths, repository owners, grants, or identifying metadata.21- Do not use the supplement to hide essential motivation, core method description, main22 theorem statements, or primary empirical results.23- Verify archives open on a clean machine and contain no credentials, cache directories,24 large irrelevant files, or hidden OS metadata.2526## Appendix architecture for proofs2728- Order appendix sections to mirror main-text theorem order; statistician reviewers navigate29 by theorem number, not by page.30- Restate each theorem before its proof so the appendix reads standalone without flipping31 back to the two-column body.32- Standard partition: notation and assumptions, main proofs, auxiliary lemmas, additional33 simulations, then real-data details.34- Keep one proof-sketch paragraph per major theorem in the body itself; an AISTATS submission35 whose entire argument lives in the supplement reads as unreviewable within the page limit.36- Cross-reference every appendix table and lemma from the body at least once; orphaned37 supplement material is invisible to reviewers and wasted under reviewer discretion.38- If the cycle allows appendices inside the main PDF after the references, confirm against39 the current instructions whether that or a separate file upload is expected.4041## What gets opened first4243| Supplement item | Inspection likelihood | Practical implication |44|---|---|---|45| Proof of the headline theorem | High | Polish it to main-text standard |46| Extra ablation and robustness tables | Medium | Reference each one from the body |47| Code archive | Variable, reviewer discretion | The README must orient a reader in one minute |48| Raw experiment logs | Low | Include for completeness, never rely on them |4950## Vignette: splitting an optimization paper5152A submission proving a convergence guarantee for a stochastic mirror-descent variant, plus53benchmark plots: the body keeps the theorem, the key lemma, the proof roadmap, and two54decision-critical figures; the appendix holds full proofs and step-size sensitivity grids;55the archive carries the seeded experiment runner. Nothing decision-critical lives only in56the archive, because archive inspection at AISTATS is discretionary.5758## Output format5960```text61[Supplement status] Ready / Needs fixes / Not ready62[Files] <appendix/proofs/code/data/logs>63[Deadline] <current supplement deadline and source>64[Anonymity checks] <passed/issues>65[Main-paper dependency] <what breaks if supplement is ignored>66```6768---6970**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-supplementary/SKILL.md`