American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (american-journal-of-obstetrics-and-gynecology)
Journal positioning
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG, "the gray journal") is a
flagship women's-health journal publishing clinical and translational research across
the full breadth of obstetrics and gynecology — maternal-fetal medicine and
pregnancy, reproductive endocrinology and infertility, gynecologic surgery, and
gynecologic oncology. Its defining expectation is a clinically important advance for
the care of pregnant patients or for gynecologic health, grounded in rigorous design and
appropriate maternal/fetal or gynecologic outcome reporting — not an underpowered
single-center series, a descriptive case report, or a study with overstated causal
claims. Because much of the work involves pregnancy, AJOG places particular weight on
pregnancy-research ethics and clear reporting of maternal and fetal/neonatal
outcomes. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid; it is not
clinical or regulatory advice and does not replace the journal's current instructions
for authors. Before submitting, re-check the live AJOG author instructions.
When to trigger
- The author names AJOG or "the gray journal" for an obstetrics or gynecology clinical study
and wants a fit/framing check.
- An OB/GYN study must be re-framed around a maternal/fetal or gynecologic outcome question
with appropriate design.
- The author is choosing between AJOG, a subspecialty OB/GYN journal, and general medicine.
- The author needs the journal's reporting-guideline, registration, and pregnancy-research
ethics expectations.
Scope & topic fit
- Maternal-fetal medicine and obstetrics: pregnancy complications, preterm birth, preeclampsia,
fetal growth, and labor/delivery management.
- Reproductive endocrinology and infertility: ovulation, assisted reproduction, and
reproductive-outcome studies.
- Gynecologic surgery: benign and minimally invasive surgery with operative and patient-centered
outcomes.
- Gynecologic oncology: cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and related cancers with clinical
endpoints.
- Maternal and women's-health screening, diagnostics, and prevention with meaningful outcomes.
- Placental, fetal, and reproductive translational science with clear clinical relevance.
Method & evidence bar
- Studies must be adequately powered with prespecified, patient-centered maternal, fetal/neonatal,
or gynecologic outcomes; surrogate endpoints need justification.
- The applicable reporting guideline and checklist are expected: CONSORT for trials, STROBE for
observational work, PRISMA for systematic reviews, STARD for diagnostic accuracy.
- Trials require prospective registration and the registration number; protocol/SAP are expected.
- Maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes must be defined and reported clearly, including gestational
age and relevant safety outcomes for mother and offspring.
- Observational claims must address confounding (including by indication), bias, and missing data;
causal language must match the design.
- Effect estimates need confidence intervals and absolute as well as relative measures; clinical
significance must be argued.
Structure & house style
- AJOG/Elsevier format with a structured abstract and an AJOG-at-a-Glance / condensation and
"why this matters" statement; re-check current article types (Original Research, etc.) and
limits on the live guide.
- The introduction frames the OB/GYN clinical question; the discussion states the practice
implication for maternal/fetal or gynecologic care plainly.
- A CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/STARD flow diagram is expected for the relevant design.
- Tables/figures follow the journal's statistical-reporting standards; a supplement carries the
protocol/SAP, full statistical methods, and additional analyses.
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.md and
../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the ICMJE/EQUATOR and AJOG/Elsevier
anchors, then cite the current AJOG page you checked.
- Search the live site for "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology instructions for
authors" and follow the current version.
- Re-check article types, abstract and condensation/at-a-Glance format, and word/figure/reference limits.
- Confirm trial registration, the reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/STARD),
data/code-availability, and protocol/SAP submission.
- Re-check IRB/ethics and consent with attention to pregnancy-research ethics (maternal consent,
fetal/neonatal considerations, vulnerable-population protections), ICMJE authorship and
conflict-of-interest disclosure, funding, and AI-use disclosure.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions
win.
Pre-submission self-check
Common desk-reject triggers
- Underpowered single-center series or case report with limited generalizability and no clear practice change.
- Observational analyses with inadequate confounding control or overstated causal claims about pregnancy outcomes.
- Incomplete or poorly defined maternal/fetal/neonatal outcome reporting.
- Missing trial registration, protocol, or the required reporting checklist.
- Inadequate pregnancy-research ethics documentation, or narrow subspecialty interest better served elsewhere.
Re-routing decision
- Gynecologic-cancer clinical-oncology endpoint dominant →
jama-oncology / annals-of-oncology.
- Gynecologic surgical technique/outcome as the primary contribution →
jama-surgery.
- Reproductive endocrinology centered on hormone mechanism →
journal-of-clinical-endocrinology-and-metabolism.
- Gestational diabetes centered on diabetes mechanism/outcomes →
diabetologia.
- Broad practice-changing obstetric/gynecologic trial → general medicine (
jama / NEJM / The Lancet in the natural-science bundle).
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (the gray journal)
[Specialty tags] <maternal-fetal / reproductive / gyn surgery / gyn oncology>
[Study design / reporting guideline] <RCT-CONSORT / cohort-STROBE / review-PRISMA / diagnostic-STARD>
[Method/evidence] <power, maternal/fetal outcome definition, confounding control, registration>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / registration / checklist / pregnancy-research ethics / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → Clinical-Medicine-Journal-Skills/skills/american-journal-of-obstetrics-and-gynecology/SKILL.md
1---2name: american-journal-of-obstetrics-and-gynecology3description: Use when targeting the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology or deciding whether an obstetrics or gynecology clinical study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit across maternal-fetal, reproductive, and gynecologic research, the clinical-evidence and pregnancy-ethics bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, AJOG house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.4---5
6
7# American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (american-journal-of-obstetrics-and-gynecology)
8
9## Journal positioning
10
11The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG, "the gray journal") is a
12flagship women's-health journal publishing clinical and translational research across
13**the full breadth of obstetrics and gynecology** — maternal-fetal medicine and
14pregnancy, reproductive endocrinology and infertility, gynecologic surgery, and
15gynecologic oncology. Its defining expectation is a **clinically important advance for
16the care of pregnant patients or for gynecologic health, grounded in rigorous design and
17appropriate maternal/fetal or gynecologic outcome reporting** — not an underpowered
18single-center series, a descriptive case report, or a study with overstated causal
19claims. Because much of the work involves pregnancy, AJOG places particular weight on
20**pregnancy-research ethics and clear reporting of maternal and fetal/neonatal
21outcomes**. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** aid; it is not
22clinical or regulatory advice and does not replace the journal's current instructions
23for authors. Before submitting, re-check the live AJOG author instructions.
24
25## When to trigger
26
27- The author names AJOG or "the gray journal" for an obstetrics or gynecology clinical study
28 and wants a fit/framing check.
29- An OB/GYN study must be re-framed around a maternal/fetal or gynecologic outcome question
30 with appropriate design.
31- The author is choosing between AJOG, a subspecialty OB/GYN journal, and general medicine.
32- The author needs the journal's reporting-guideline, registration, and pregnancy-research
33 ethics expectations.
34
35## Scope & topic fit
36
37- Maternal-fetal medicine and obstetrics: pregnancy complications, preterm birth, preeclampsia,
38 fetal growth, and labor/delivery management.
39- Reproductive endocrinology and infertility: ovulation, assisted reproduction, and
40 reproductive-outcome studies.
41- Gynecologic surgery: benign and minimally invasive surgery with operative and patient-centered
42 outcomes.
43- Gynecologic oncology: cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and related cancers with clinical
44 endpoints.
45- Maternal and women's-health screening, diagnostics, and prevention with meaningful outcomes.
46- Placental, fetal, and reproductive translational science with clear clinical relevance.
47
48## Method & evidence bar
49
50- Studies must be adequately powered with prespecified, patient-centered maternal, fetal/neonatal,
51 or gynecologic outcomes; surrogate endpoints need justification.
52- The applicable reporting guideline and checklist are expected: CONSORT for trials, STROBE for
53 observational work, PRISMA for systematic reviews, STARD for diagnostic accuracy.
54- Trials require prospective registration and the registration number; protocol/SAP are expected.
55- Maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes must be defined and reported clearly, including gestational
56 age and relevant safety outcomes for mother and offspring.
57- Observational claims must address confounding (including by indication), bias, and missing data;
58 causal language must match the design.
59- Effect estimates need confidence intervals and absolute as well as relative measures; clinical
60 significance must be argued.
61
62## Structure & house style
63
64- AJOG/Elsevier format with a structured abstract and an AJOG-at-a-Glance / condensation and
65 "why this matters" statement; re-check current article types (Original Research, etc.) and
66 limits on the live guide.
67- The introduction frames the OB/GYN clinical question; the discussion states the practice
68 implication for maternal/fetal or gynecologic care plainly.
69- A CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/STARD flow diagram is expected for the relevant design.
70- Tables/figures follow the journal's statistical-reporting standards; a supplement carries the
71 protocol/SAP, full statistical methods, and additional analyses.
72
73## Official-submission checklist
74
75- Before giving submission-ready advice, read `../../resources/source-basis.md` and
76 `../../resources/official-source-map.md`; start from the ICMJE/EQUATOR and AJOG/Elsevier
77 anchors, then cite the current AJOG page you checked.
78- Search the live site for "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology instructions for
79 authors" and follow the current version.
80- Re-check article types, abstract and condensation/at-a-Glance format, and word/figure/reference limits.
81- Confirm trial registration, the reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/STARD),
82 data/code-availability, and protocol/SAP submission.
83- Re-check IRB/ethics and consent with attention to pregnancy-research ethics (maternal consent,
84 fetal/neonatal considerations, vulnerable-population protections), ICMJE authorship and
85 conflict-of-interest disclosure, funding, and AI-use disclosure.
86- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions
87 win.
88
89## Pre-submission self-check
90
91- [ ] The study answers a clinically important obstetric or gynecologic question with a clear practice implication.
92- [ ] Maternal, fetal/neonatal, or gynecologic outcomes are prespecified, powered, and clearly defined.
93- [ ] The correct reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/STARD) is completed and attached.
94- [ ] Trials are prospectively registered with the number in the manuscript; protocol/SAP provided.
95- [ ] Pregnancy-research ethics (maternal consent, fetal/neonatal and vulnerable-population protections) are documented.
96- [ ] IRB/consent, ICMJE disclosures, and a data-availability statement are prepared.
97
98## Common desk-reject triggers
99
100- Underpowered single-center series or case report with limited generalizability and no clear practice change.
101- Observational analyses with inadequate confounding control or overstated causal claims about pregnancy outcomes.
102- Incomplete or poorly defined maternal/fetal/neonatal outcome reporting.
103- Missing trial registration, protocol, or the required reporting checklist.
104- Inadequate pregnancy-research ethics documentation, or narrow subspecialty interest better served elsewhere.
105
106## Re-routing decision
107
108- Gynecologic-cancer clinical-oncology endpoint dominant → `jama-oncology` / `annals-of-oncology`.
109- Gynecologic surgical technique/outcome as the primary contribution → `jama-surgery`.
110- Reproductive endocrinology centered on hormone mechanism → `journal-of-clinical-endocrinology-and-metabolism`.
111- Gestational diabetes centered on diabetes mechanism/outcomes → `diabetologia`.
112- Broad practice-changing obstetric/gynecologic trial → general medicine (`jama` / NEJM / The Lancet in the natural-science bundle).
113
114## Output format
115
116```text
117[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
118[Target] American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (the gray journal)
119[Specialty tags] <maternal-fetal / reproductive / gyn surgery / gyn oncology>
120[Study design / reporting guideline] <RCT-CONSORT / cohort-STROBE / review-PRISMA / diagnostic-STARD>
121[Method/evidence] <power, maternal/fetal outcome definition, confounding control, registration>
122[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
123[Official items to re-check] <article type / registration / checklist / pregnancy-research ethics / disclosures>
124[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
125```
126
127---
128
129**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Clinical-Medicine-Journal-Skills/skills/american-journal-of-obstetrics-and-gynecology/SKILL.md`