CoRL Submission
This is the pre-upload audit for a CoRL paper. The numbers below are the CoRL 2026
requirements as read on 2026-07-08 from the official Instruction for Authors and
Call for Papers (corl.org); the 2026 deadline has passed, so apply this skill to a
2027-cycle draft after re-opening the new year's pages — CoRL re-issues its
instructions annually and has changed page accounting between cycles.
The 2026 package, itemized
| Element |
2026 rule |
Notes |
| Platform |
OpenReview, group robot-learning.org/CoRL/2026/Conference |
Profile + conflicts needed for every author |
| Abstract registration |
May 26, 2026 |
Separate, earlier than the paper |
| Paper deadline |
May 29, 2026 |
Deadline clock/timezone wording 待核实 per cycle |
| Main text |
8 pages, including a mandatory Limitations section |
Limitations counts toward the limit — budget for it |
| Not counted |
Acknowledgments, references, optional appendix |
Appendix rides in the same PDF |
| Template |
corl_2026 LaTeX class |
Camera-ready later flips to [final] mode |
| Review model |
Double-anonymous |
Applies to paper, supplementary, and any linked site |
| Supplementary |
Encouraged; video ≤ 250 MB (strict), ~3 min suggested |
See corl-supplementary for content strategy |
What makes the CoRL audit different
Two venue-specific traps dominate desk problems here, and neither exists in the
same form at neighboring conferences:
- The Limitations section is not optional and not free. The 2026 instructions
require every submission to include a Limitations section — limiting
assumptions, failure modes, and how they might be addressed — and it counts
inside the 8 pages. Drafts imported from NeurIPS-style templates (where such
sections often sit outside the limit) silently overflow. Audit the page budget
with Limitations present, not as an afterthought.
- Project pages leak identity. Robot-learning papers habitually ship a
project website with videos. During review, any link that identifies an author,
lab, or institution is an anonymity violation under the 2026 instructions —
this includes the URL itself (
lab-name.github.io fails even if the page is
scrubbed). Use an anonymous hosting pattern or put the video in the
supplementary upload instead.
Anonymity sweep for a robot-learning paper
Beyond the standard items (author block, acknowledgments, metadata, third-person
self-citation), sweep the modalities specific to this field:
- Video frames: lab signage, whiteboards, badge lanyards, reflections in glossy
robot shells, distinctive lab furniture that appears in your prior papers.
- Robot livery: stickers, hostnames on monitors, custom end-effectors already
associated with your group.
- Dataset paths burned into figures or config listings (
/home/<user>/...).
- Repository and W&B links in code snippets or appendix listings.
# Mechanical pre-upload pass on the submission PDF and supplementary bundle
pdftotext main.pdf - | grep -nEi 'github\.io|github\.com|wandb|acknowledg|our (lab|group|university)' | head
pdfinfo main.pdf | grep -Ei 'author|creator|producer'
grep -RnEi 'hostname|/home/|api_key' supplementary/code/ | head
stat -c '%n %s' supplementary/video.mp4 # must be <= 250 MB (2026 strict cap)
pdftotext main.pdf - | grep -ci 'limitation' # 0 hits => missing mandatory section
Page-budget strategy under the 8+Limitations rule
- Write the Limitations section early and hold it at a fixed budget (half a page is
a common shape); do not let it become the compression victim of deadline week.
- Overflow goes to the appendix — reviewers are not obligated to read it, so only
non-load-bearing detail (full hyperparameter tables, extra rollouts, per-task
breakdowns beyond the headline) may live there.
- Do not fight the template: class-file modifications, margin edits, and squeezed
float spacing are detectable and read as rule-testing to ACs.
Form fields and policy checks
- Abstract registration first. The 2026 cycle separated abstract (May 26) and
paper (May 29); a missed abstract registration forecloses the submission
entirely. Register with a stable title and author list.
- Dual submission: the paper must not be under review elsewhere; the
fast-moving robot-learning arXiv culture makes this an easy accident when a
workshop version is circulating — check the current CFP's exact scope wording
each cycle.
- GenAI policy: the 2026 Instruction for Authors added a generative-AI policy
(announced April 2026); its exact disclosure requirements are 待核实 in this
pack — read that section verbatim before submitting.
- Subject areas / keywords on the form drive reviewer assignment in a small,
specialized pool; pick the subfield your harshest competent critic works in.
Pre-upload checklist
[ ] Abstract registered by the abstract deadline (title/authors stable)
[ ] Main text <= 8 pages WITH Limitations section included and substantive
[ ] References + appendix after main text, same PDF, uncounted
[ ] corl_2026 template unmodified; compiles with no page-limit tricks
[ ] Anonymity sweep passed: text, figures, video frames, links, metadata
[ ] Supplementary video <= 250 MB, ~3 min, anonymized end to end
[ ] Code/data (if included) scrubbed of identities, paths, and keys
[ ] OpenReview form: authors, conflicts, keywords, abstract synced with PDF
[ ] Dual-submission status confirmed with every coauthor in writing
[ ] GenAI-policy disclosure handled per the current instructions [待核实]
Re-verify each cycle
Page accounting (the 2026 camera-ready got a 9th page; earlier cycles differed),
the Limitations rule, video caps, the GenAI policy, and deadline clock conventions
are all chair-set and cycle-volatile. The controlling sources are
https://www.corl.org/contributions/call-for-papers and
https://www.corl.org/contributions/instruction-for-authors for the live year —
open both before trusting any number in this file.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → CoRL-Skills/skills/corl-submission/SKILL.md
1---2name: corl-submission3description: Use when preparing or auditing a CoRL OpenReview submission — the corl_2026 LaTeX template, the 8-page main text with a mandatory Limitations section counted inside it, uncounted references and appendix, the supplementary file and 250 MB video, double-anonymous rules, abstract registration, and dual-submission checks.4---567# CoRL Submission89This is the pre-upload audit for a CoRL paper. The numbers below are the CoRL 202610requirements as read on 2026-07-08 from the official Instruction for Authors and11Call for Papers (corl.org); the 2026 deadline has passed, so apply this skill to a122027-cycle draft after re-opening the new year's pages — CoRL re-issues its13instructions annually and has changed page accounting between cycles.1415## The 2026 package, itemized1617| Element | 2026 rule | Notes |18|---|---|---|19| Platform | OpenReview, group `robot-learning.org/CoRL/2026/Conference` | Profile + conflicts needed for every author |20| Abstract registration | May 26, 2026 | Separate, earlier than the paper |21| Paper deadline | May 29, 2026 | Deadline clock/timezone wording 待核实 per cycle |22| Main text | 8 pages, **including a mandatory Limitations section** | Limitations counts toward the limit — budget for it |23| Not counted | Acknowledgments, references, optional appendix | Appendix rides in the same PDF |24| Template | `corl_2026` LaTeX class | Camera-ready later flips to `[final]` mode |25| Review model | Double-anonymous | Applies to paper, supplementary, and any linked site |26| Supplementary | Encouraged; video ≤ 250 MB (strict), ~3 min suggested | See `corl-supplementary` for content strategy |2728## What makes the CoRL audit different2930Two venue-specific traps dominate desk problems here, and neither exists in the31same form at neighboring conferences:32331. **The Limitations section is not optional and not free.** The 2026 instructions34 require every submission to include a Limitations section — limiting35 assumptions, failure modes, and how they might be addressed — and it counts36 inside the 8 pages. Drafts imported from NeurIPS-style templates (where such37 sections often sit outside the limit) silently overflow. Audit the page budget38 with Limitations present, not as an afterthought.392. **Project pages leak identity.** Robot-learning papers habitually ship a40 project website with videos. During review, any link that identifies an author,41 lab, or institution is an anonymity violation under the 2026 instructions —42 this includes the URL itself (`lab-name.github.io` fails even if the page is43 scrubbed). Use an anonymous hosting pattern or put the video in the44 supplementary upload instead.4546## Anonymity sweep for a robot-learning paper4748Beyond the standard items (author block, acknowledgments, metadata, third-person49self-citation), sweep the modalities specific to this field:5051- **Video frames**: lab signage, whiteboards, badge lanyards, reflections in glossy52 robot shells, distinctive lab furniture that appears in your prior papers.53- **Robot livery**: stickers, hostnames on monitors, custom end-effectors already54 associated with your group.55- **Dataset paths** burned into figures or config listings (`/home/<user>/...`).56- **Repository and W&B links** in code snippets or appendix listings.5758```bash59# Mechanical pre-upload pass on the submission PDF and supplementary bundle60pdftotext main.pdf - | grep -nEi 'github\.io|github\.com|wandb|acknowledg|our (lab|group|university)' | head61pdfinfo main.pdf | grep -Ei 'author|creator|producer'62grep -RnEi 'hostname|/home/|api_key' supplementary/code/ | head63stat -c '%n %s' supplementary/video.mp4 # must be <= 250 MB (2026 strict cap)64pdftotext main.pdf - | grep -ci 'limitation' # 0 hits => missing mandatory section65```6667## Page-budget strategy under the 8+Limitations rule6869- Write the Limitations section early and hold it at a fixed budget (half a page is70 a common shape); do not let it become the compression victim of deadline week.71- Overflow goes to the appendix — reviewers are not obligated to read it, so only72 non-load-bearing detail (full hyperparameter tables, extra rollouts, per-task73 breakdowns beyond the headline) may live there.74- Do not fight the template: class-file modifications, margin edits, and squeezed75 float spacing are detectable and read as rule-testing to ACs.7677## Form fields and policy checks7879- **Abstract registration first.** The 2026 cycle separated abstract (May 26) and80 paper (May 29); a missed abstract registration forecloses the submission81 entirely. Register with a stable title and author list.82- **Dual submission**: the paper must not be under review elsewhere; the83 fast-moving robot-learning arXiv culture makes this an easy accident when a84 workshop version is circulating — check the current CFP's exact scope wording85 each cycle.86- **GenAI policy**: the 2026 Instruction for Authors added a generative-AI policy87 (announced April 2026); its exact disclosure requirements are 待核实 in this88 pack — read that section verbatim before submitting.89- Subject areas / keywords on the form drive reviewer assignment in a small,90 specialized pool; pick the subfield your harshest competent critic works in.9192## Pre-upload checklist9394```text95[ ] Abstract registered by the abstract deadline (title/authors stable)96[ ] Main text <= 8 pages WITH Limitations section included and substantive97[ ] References + appendix after main text, same PDF, uncounted98[ ] corl_2026 template unmodified; compiles with no page-limit tricks99[ ] Anonymity sweep passed: text, figures, video frames, links, metadata100[ ] Supplementary video <= 250 MB, ~3 min, anonymized end to end101[ ] Code/data (if included) scrubbed of identities, paths, and keys102[ ] OpenReview form: authors, conflicts, keywords, abstract synced with PDF103[ ] Dual-submission status confirmed with every coauthor in writing104[ ] GenAI-policy disclosure handled per the current instructions [待核实]105```106107## Re-verify each cycle108109Page accounting (the 2026 camera-ready got a 9th page; earlier cycles differed),110the Limitations rule, video caps, the GenAI policy, and deadline clock conventions111are all chair-set and cycle-volatile. The controlling sources are112https://www.corl.org/contributions/call-for-papers and113https://www.corl.org/contributions/instruction-for-authors for the live year —114open both before trusting any number in this file.115116---117118**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `CoRL-Skills/skills/corl-submission/SKILL.md`