Topic Selection (ectheory-topic-selection)
When to trigger
- You have a new estimator, limit result, or proof and are choosing a target journal
- Unsure whether the result is "ET-foundational" or really an applied/empirical paper
- Deciding between a full Article and a short Miscellanea
- Wondering whether the result fits one of ET's themed special-issue directions
The ET fit bar
ET rewards rigorous, general contributions to the mathematical and statistical foundations of
econometrics — asymptotic theory, probability-theoretic methods, time-series and nonstationarity
theory, high-dimensional and non-standard environments. The question to answer first: does this
result teach econometricians something about a method, a limit, or an inferential problem in
generality, rather than reporting one applied estimate? An empirical application is welcome only as
illustration; the spine must be theory.
Signals of a good ET topic:
- A new limit theory (consistency, asymptotic normality, rate, FCLT) under explicitly stated,
defensible regularity conditions
- A method whose inferential properties (size, power, robustness, partial identification) are
characterized, not just asserted
- A result that generalizes a known special case (weaker assumptions, broader DGP, larger
dimension, dependent data)
- Fit with current ET directions: econometric theory for ML/AI, causal inference under complex
interference, robust inference and partial identification, high-dimensional and non-standard
environments, network/spatial econometrics
Article vs Miscellanea
- Article — multiple major contributions, a new method with extensive proofs, and usually
simulations or an application. Regular Articles must not exceed 50 pages (overflow → online
Supplement).
- Miscellanea — a dedicated venue for one or two key innovations stated and proved
concisely; typically fewer than 20 pages, often ~15. A clean single theorem that sharpens or
corrects existing theory is a natural Miscellanea.
- The ET Interview is an invited oral-history genre, not author-submitted — do not target it.
Checklist
Anti-patterns
- An applied paper with a thin "theory" wrapper (belongs at an applied outlet)
- A narrow corollary of a known theorem dressed as a full Article (consider Miscellanea or rework)
- Targeting the invited ET Interview genre as if it were submittable
Fit-vs-venue routing table
When a result could go to several outlets, route it by what each venue rewards. Econometric Theory owns the
pure limit theory — the theorem and its proof are the contribution, with simulation as illustration.
| Result shape |
Best home |
Why |
| New limit theory / proof, generality is the point |
Econometric Theory |
rigorous asymptotics is ET's identity |
| Method with heavy empirical payoff, lighter theory |
applied-method outlet |
the estimate carries the paper |
| One sharp theorem correcting/sharpening existing theory |
ET Miscellanea |
a concise 1–2 innovation venue |
| Theory plus a major economic-substance contribution |
a general-interest journal |
economics is co-equal there |
A quick desk-reject self-test: if you cannot say in one sentence which assumption you weaken or which
limiting law was previously unproven, the result is likely a corollary, not an ET Article.
Fit pass for Econometric Theory
Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the primitive assumptions, theorem statement, proof route, and example showing why the result matters; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: econometric theorists who read for assumptions, theorem novelty, proof architecture, and relation to known asymptotics.
- Do the pass: Score the manuscript on venue fit, novelty, evidence readiness, and audience ownership; reject a prestige-only target when a sibling venue owns the contribution more directly.
- Return a ledger: give
claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.
- Sibling guard: compare against Journal of Econometrics for applied-method reach, Quantitative Economics for theoretical economics, Econometrica for general theory-plus-economics contribution; if a sibling owns the contribution, recommend re-routing before polishing format.
- Stop condition: do not give submission-ready advice until the pack's
resources/official-source-map.md has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.
Output format
【Result】one-line statement of the theorem/limit
【ET fit】foundational theory? [Y/N] + why
【Type】Article / Miscellanea + page budget
【Themed fit】direction (if any)
【Next step】ectheory-literature-positioning
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → Econometric-Theory-Skills/skills/ectheory-topic-selection/SKILL.md
1---2name: ectheory-topic-selection3description: Use when deciding whether a result is the right kind of contribution for Econometric Theory (ET) — a general, foundational econometric-theory result (asymptotics, proofs, theorems) rather than an applied estimate, and whether it fits a full Article or a short Miscellanea.4---567# Topic Selection (ectheory-topic-selection)89## When to trigger1011- You have a new estimator, limit result, or proof and are choosing a target journal12- Unsure whether the result is "ET-foundational" or really an applied/empirical paper13- Deciding between a full **Article** and a short **Miscellanea**14- Wondering whether the result fits one of ET's themed special-issue directions1516## The ET fit bar1718ET rewards **rigorous, general contributions to the mathematical and statistical foundations of19econometrics** — asymptotic theory, probability-theoretic methods, time-series and nonstationarity20theory, high-dimensional and non-standard environments. The question to answer first: *does this21result teach econometricians something about a method, a limit, or an inferential problem in22generality*, rather than reporting one applied estimate? An empirical application is welcome only as23illustration; the spine must be theory.2425Signals of a good ET topic:2627- A **new limit theory** (consistency, asymptotic normality, rate, FCLT) under explicitly stated,28 defensible regularity conditions29- A method whose **inferential properties** (size, power, robustness, partial identification) are30 characterized, not just asserted31- A result that **generalizes** a known special case (weaker assumptions, broader DGP, larger32 dimension, dependent data)33- Fit with current ET directions: econometric theory for ML/AI, causal inference under complex34 interference, robust inference and partial identification, high-dimensional and non-standard35 environments, network/spatial econometrics3637## Article vs Miscellanea3839- **Article** — multiple major contributions, a new method with extensive proofs, and usually40 simulations or an application. Regular Articles must not exceed **50 pages** (overflow → online41 Supplement).42- **Miscellanea** — a dedicated venue for **one or two key innovations** stated and proved43 concisely; typically **fewer than 20 pages, often ~15**. A clean single theorem that sharpens or44 corrects existing theory is a natural Miscellanea.45- The **ET Interview** is an invited oral-history genre, **not** author-submitted — do not target it.4647## Checklist4849- [ ] The contribution is a general theory result, not a single applied estimate50- [ ] Regularity conditions are statable and defensible (see ectheory-identification-strategy)51- [ ] The generality over prior work is one sentence you can say out loud52- [ ] Article vs Miscellanea chosen, with a length budget against the 50-page ceiling53- [ ] Fit with ET scope / a themed direction articulated5455## Anti-patterns5657- An applied paper with a thin "theory" wrapper (belongs at an applied outlet)58- A narrow corollary of a known theorem dressed as a full Article (consider Miscellanea or rework)59- Targeting the invited ET Interview genre as if it were submittable6061## Fit-vs-venue routing table6263When a result could go to several outlets, route it by what each venue rewards. Econometric Theory owns the64*pure limit theory* — the theorem and its proof are the contribution, with simulation as illustration.6566| Result shape | Best home | Why |67| --- | --- | --- |68| New limit theory / proof, generality is the point | Econometric Theory | rigorous asymptotics is ET's identity |69| Method with heavy empirical payoff, lighter theory | applied-method outlet | the estimate carries the paper |70| One sharp theorem correcting/sharpening existing theory | ET Miscellanea | a concise 1–2 innovation venue |71| Theory plus a major economic-substance contribution | a general-interest journal | economics is co-equal there |7273A quick desk-reject self-test: if you cannot say in one sentence which assumption you weaken or which74limiting law was previously unproven, the result is likely a corollary, not an ET Article.757677## Fit pass for Econometric Theory7879Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the primitive assumptions, theorem statement, proof route, and example showing why the result matters; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: econometric theorists who read for assumptions, theorem novelty, proof architecture, and relation to known asymptotics.8081- **Do the pass:** Score the manuscript on venue fit, novelty, evidence readiness, and audience ownership; reject a prestige-only target when a sibling venue owns the contribution more directly.82- **Return a ledger:** give `claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location` rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.83- **Sibling guard:** compare against Journal of Econometrics for applied-method reach, Quantitative Economics for theoretical economics, Econometrica for general theory-plus-economics contribution; if a sibling owns the contribution, recommend re-routing before polishing format.84- **Stop condition:** do not give submission-ready advice until the pack's `resources/official-source-map.md` has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.8586## Output format8788```89【Result】one-line statement of the theorem/limit90【ET fit】foundational theory? [Y/N] + why91【Type】Article / Miscellanea + page budget92【Themed fit】direction (if any)93【Next step】ectheory-literature-positioning94```9596---9798**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Econometric-Theory-Skills/skills/ectheory-topic-selection/SKILL.md`