EDBT Camera Ready
Use this after acceptance. EDBT papers are published open access on OpenProceedings.org under a
CC-BY-NC-ND license with copyright retained by the authors — this is an open-access production
step, not an ACM/IEEE DL upload. Reopen the current host-site camera-ready instructions, the
OpenProceedings author guidelines, the decision email, and the registration page before advising.
Camera-ready audit
- Use the host/OpenProceedings template, current revision, within the per-shape page budget plus
any camera-ready allowance the acceptance letter states. Do not switch to
acmart or IEEEtran.
- Complete the OpenProceedings license and copyright step: the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 publishing
license (or the exact license the current volume specifies) with author-retained copyright. This
is different from an ACM e-rights or IEEE copyright transfer — do not fill in the wrong form.
- Enter the volume metadata: title/abstract, author order and affiliations, ORCIDs where asked,
and the fields OpenProceedings needs for the ISBN-bearing volume and the DBLP/Scholar/SCOPUS
records. Metadata errors in an open-access record are awkward to fix after the volume is frozen.
- De-anonymize (if the cycle was double-blind): restore the author block, affiliations,
acknowledgements, funding, and the real system and repository names.
- Integrate reviewer-required and revise changes faithfully — without strengthening claims beyond
what was evaluated.
- Permanentize the artifact: replace any anonymized or temporary link with a public,
DOI-issuing archive under a compatible license, and update the availability statement to point at
it.
- Confirm registration and presentation: at least one author presents at the edition your cycle
feeds (recall the last-cycle roll to the next year).
Open-access metadata and rights checks
[Template] host/OpenProceedings template, current revision; no manual margin/font edits
[License] CC-BY-NC-ND publishing license completed; copyright retained by authors (NOT an ACM/IEEE transfer)
[Metadata] title, abstract, authors + affiliations/ORCID, keywords all entered and matching PDF
[Volume] ISBN/volume fields as the OpenProceedings volume requires
[References] complete and consistent; DOIs where available (references are unlimited — keep them full)
[Figures] vector where possible; readable in print and on screen; captions self-contained
[Links] every artifact / availability link resolves from a logged-out browser
De-anonymization sweep (if the cycle was double-blind)
| Anonymized at submission |
Restore at camera-ready |
Watch for |
| Author block, affiliations, ORCID |
Full, correctly ordered |
Wrong author order breaks the citation |
| System / prototype name |
Real name throughout text, figures, artifact |
A leftover placeholder in a caption |
| Acknowledgements, funding |
Restored |
Grant numbers required by funders |
| Repository / artifact link |
Public DOI archive |
The old anonymized URL surviving in a footnote |
If the cycle was single-blind, there is nothing to de-anonymize — but still confirm the artifact link
is the permanent, public one.
Worked example: integrating a revise change
The reviewers required adding a tuned baseline at larger scale and moving an overhead result from the
appendix into the body. Camera-ready move: place the overhead result in the scope/discussion with its
measurement, add the promised scaling table with variance, restore the real system name in the
figures, and point the availability statement at the now-public DOI-archived artifact — without
expanding the claim the reviewers accepted.
Hedged logistics
- Page allowances, the exact license text and metadata fields, and camera-ready dates change each
cycle and each host edition; confirm against the decision email and the current OpenProceedings /
host instructions rather than a prior year.
- The publication month depends on which cycle accepted the paper (the rolling model clusters
publication across the year); check when your volume goes live.
Output format
[Camera-ready status] ready / needs fixes / blocked
[Template + budget] host/OpenProceedings template, per-shape budget met? yes/no
[License] CC-BY-NC-ND completed, copyright retained (not ACM/IEEE)? yes/no
[Metadata] authors/affiliations/ORCID/keywords + ISBN volume fields complete? yes/no
[De-anonymization] (if double-blind) author block / system name / links restored? yes/no
[Reviewer-change map] <required change -> final edit, no scope creep>
[Open science] artifact link is a permanent DOI archive? yes/no
[Remaining owner] <person -> task>
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-camera-ready/SKILL.md
1---2name: edbt-camera-ready3description: Use when preparing an accepted EDBT paper for its OpenProceedings camera-ready, covering the host/OpenProceedings LaTeX template, the CC-BY-NC-ND open-access license and copyright form, ISBN/volume metadata, integrating reviewer-required changes without scope creep, permanentizing artifact links, and the presentation obligation.4---567# EDBT Camera Ready89Use this after acceptance. EDBT papers are published **open access on OpenProceedings.org** under a10**CC-BY-NC-ND** license with copyright retained by the authors — this is an open-access production11step, not an ACM/IEEE DL upload. Reopen the current host-site camera-ready instructions, the12OpenProceedings author guidelines, the decision email, and the registration page before advising.1314## Camera-ready audit1516- **Use the host/OpenProceedings template,** current revision, within the per-shape page budget plus17 any camera-ready allowance the acceptance letter states. Do not switch to `acmart` or `IEEEtran`.18- **Complete the OpenProceedings license and copyright step:** the **CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0** publishing19 license (or the exact license the current volume specifies) with author-retained copyright. This20 is different from an ACM e-rights or IEEE copyright transfer — do not fill in the wrong form.21- **Enter the volume metadata:** title/abstract, author order and affiliations, ORCIDs where asked,22 and the fields OpenProceedings needs for the **ISBN-bearing** volume and the DBLP/Scholar/SCOPUS23 records. Metadata errors in an open-access record are awkward to fix after the volume is frozen.24- **De-anonymize (if the cycle was double-blind):** restore the author block, affiliations,25 acknowledgements, funding, and the real system and repository names.26- **Integrate reviewer-required and revise changes** faithfully — without strengthening claims beyond27 what was evaluated.28- **Permanentize the artifact:** replace any anonymized or temporary link with a public,29 DOI-issuing archive under a compatible license, and update the availability statement to point at30 it.31- **Confirm registration and presentation:** at least one author presents at the edition your cycle32 feeds (recall the last-cycle roll to the next year).3334## Open-access metadata and rights checks3536```text37[Template] host/OpenProceedings template, current revision; no manual margin/font edits38[License] CC-BY-NC-ND publishing license completed; copyright retained by authors (NOT an ACM/IEEE transfer)39[Metadata] title, abstract, authors + affiliations/ORCID, keywords all entered and matching PDF40[Volume] ISBN/volume fields as the OpenProceedings volume requires41[References] complete and consistent; DOIs where available (references are unlimited — keep them full)42[Figures] vector where possible; readable in print and on screen; captions self-contained43[Links] every artifact / availability link resolves from a logged-out browser44```4546## De-anonymization sweep (if the cycle was double-blind)4748| Anonymized at submission | Restore at camera-ready | Watch for |49|---|---|---|50| Author block, affiliations, ORCID | Full, correctly ordered | Wrong author order breaks the citation |51| System / prototype name | Real name throughout text, figures, artifact | A leftover placeholder in a caption |52| Acknowledgements, funding | Restored | Grant numbers required by funders |53| Repository / artifact link | Public DOI archive | The old anonymized URL surviving in a footnote |5455If the cycle was single-blind, there is nothing to de-anonymize — but still confirm the artifact link56is the permanent, public one.5758## Worked example: integrating a revise change5960The reviewers required adding a tuned baseline at larger scale and moving an overhead result from the61appendix into the body. Camera-ready move: place the overhead result in the scope/discussion with its62measurement, add the promised scaling table with variance, restore the real system name in the63figures, and point the availability statement at the now-public DOI-archived artifact — without64expanding the claim the reviewers accepted.6566## Hedged logistics6768- Page allowances, the exact license text and metadata fields, and camera-ready dates change each69 cycle and each host edition; confirm against the decision email and the current OpenProceedings /70 host instructions rather than a prior year.71- The publication month depends on which cycle accepted the paper (the rolling model clusters72 publication across the year); check when your volume goes live.7374## Output format7576```text77[Camera-ready status] ready / needs fixes / blocked78[Template + budget] host/OpenProceedings template, per-shape budget met? yes/no79[License] CC-BY-NC-ND completed, copyright retained (not ACM/IEEE)? yes/no80[Metadata] authors/affiliations/ORCID/keywords + ISBN volume fields complete? yes/no81[De-anonymization] (if double-blind) author block / system name / links restored? yes/no82[Reviewer-change map] <required change -> final edit, no scope creep>83[Open science] artifact link is a permanent DOI archive? yes/no84[Remaining owner] <person -> task>85```8687---8889**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-camera-ready/SKILL.md`