Submission Preflight (epsl-submission)
The last pass before uploading to Editorial Manager, EPSL's Elsevier submission and peer-review
system. The avoidable failures at this stage are mechanical: a main text over the letters cap, a
missing data-availability statement, undeposited data, or incomplete declarations — each can bounce
the manuscript before any science is read. Exact requirements (word cap, highlights, file formats)
are volatile; re-check them on the official Guide for Authors the week you submit.
Templates in this skill: templates/checklist.md and
templates/manuscript_template.md.
When to trigger
- Final pass before upload to Editorial Manager
- Unsure which files, statements, and metadata EPSL expects
- Verifying the letters-format constraints are actually met
Process facts (re-check volatile items on the official page)
- Publisher / system: Elsevier; submission through Editorial Manager (the journal's entry link
is on the ScienceDirect journal page).
- Format: a Letter — main text (introduction through conclusions) capped near 6,500 words
(re-check); concise titles; companion papers discouraged.
- Article types: Letters; invited Frontiers Papers (do not self-select without invitation);
Comments/Replies; Errata/Corrigenda; Special-Issue papers.
- Data: Elsevier research-data policy — a data-availability statement, discipline-repository
deposition (EarthChem, PANGAEA, IRIS/EarthScope, MagIC, NASA PDS, Zenodo), linked at submission.
- Declarations: competing interests, authorship/CRediT contributions, funding, and generative-AI
use per Elsevier policy; ORCID for the corresponding author.
- References: Elsevier author–date house style (re-check the current instructions); DOIs included.
- Supplement: uploaded with the manuscript and reviewed with it.
Preflight checklist
Format & length
Files
Statements & metadata
Bounce-at-upload gates
| Gate |
Pass condition |
Fixed in |
| Letters length |
main text within cap |
epsl-writing-style |
| Data statement |
present, identifiers resolve |
epsl-reporting-and-reproducibility |
| Declarations |
COI / CRediT / funding / AI complete |
this skill |
| Figure files |
format, resolution, colormaps compliant |
epsl-figures-and-tables |
| Article type |
Letter (Frontiers only if invited) |
epsl-workflow |
Worked micro-example (illustrative — the night-before pass on the slab-fluid Letter)
- Length: main text 6,140 words introduction→conclusions — under the cap with margin for
revision growth. Pass.
- Data: EarthChem DOI for the boron dataset resolves; the tomography model archived with a Zenodo
DOI; both cited in the statement. Pass.
- Declarations: CRediT roles drafted per author; no competing interests; AI-use statement covers
the language-editing tool per Elsevier policy.
- The near-miss: the supplement still cited "Figure S6," deleted two drafts ago — a broken
internal reference reviewers reliably notice. Caught by a final cross-reference sweep.
Anti-patterns
- Counting only the abstract-to-references span and discovering the cap violation after format checks
- "Data available on request" in the statement field
- Declarations copied from another journal's template with the wrong policy names
- Self-selecting the Frontiers type to look invited
- Uploading supplement and manuscript versions that disagree on a number
Output format
【Length】main-text words vs cap (re-check) [count / cap]
【Files】manuscript + figures + supplement compliant? [Y/N]
【Data statement】DOIs resolve? [Y/N]
【Declarations】COI / CRediT / funding / AI / ORCID? [Y/N]
【Reviewers + cover letter】entered and final? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → epsl-revision-and-rebuttal
Supplementary resources
templates/checklist.md — the full itemized preflight
templates/manuscript_template.md — a letters-format manuscript skeleton
../../resources/official-source-map.md — Guide for Authors and Editorial Manager entry links
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-submission/SKILL.md
1---2name: epsl-submission3description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) via Editorial Manager — letters-format length check, title page and highlights, declarations (competing interests, authorship, AI use), data-availability statement with repository DOIs, and figure/table file compliance. Final checks; it does not draft content.4---567# Submission Preflight (epsl-submission)89The last pass before uploading to **Editorial Manager**, EPSL's Elsevier submission and peer-review10system. The avoidable failures at this stage are mechanical: a main text over the letters cap, a11missing data-availability statement, undeposited data, or incomplete declarations — each can bounce12the manuscript before any science is read. Exact requirements (word cap, highlights, file formats)13are volatile; re-check them on the official Guide for Authors the week you submit.1415Templates in this skill: [`templates/checklist.md`](templates/checklist.md) and16[`templates/manuscript_template.md`](templates/manuscript_template.md).1718## When to trigger1920- Final pass before upload to Editorial Manager21- Unsure which files, statements, and metadata EPSL expects22- Verifying the letters-format constraints are actually met2324## Process facts (re-check volatile items on the official page)2526- **Publisher / system:** Elsevier; submission through **Editorial Manager** (the journal's entry link27 is on the ScienceDirect journal page).28- **Format:** a Letter — main text (introduction through conclusions) capped near **6,500 words**29 (re-check); concise titles; companion papers discouraged.30- **Article types:** Letters; invited **Frontiers Papers** (do not self-select without invitation);31 Comments/Replies; Errata/Corrigenda; Special-Issue papers.32- **Data:** Elsevier research-data policy — a **data-availability statement**, discipline-repository33 deposition (EarthChem, PANGAEA, IRIS/EarthScope, MagIC, NASA PDS, Zenodo), linked at submission.34- **Declarations:** competing interests, authorship/CRediT contributions, funding, and generative-AI35 use per Elsevier policy; ORCID for the corresponding author.36- **References:** Elsevier author–date house style (re-check the current instructions); DOIs included.37- **Supplement:** uploaded with the manuscript and reviewed with it.3839## Preflight checklist4041### Format & length42- [ ] Main text within the letters cap (count introduction → conclusions; re-check the figure)43- [ ] Title concise and process-forward; abstract self-contained with the headline number44- [ ] Highlights prepared if the current guide requires them (re-check)4546### Files47- [ ] Manuscript source file per the guide; figures at required resolution/format, vector line art48- [ ] Supplementary material assembled and internally referenced (Fig. S1, Table S1…)49- [ ] Full data tables deposited; DOIs/accessions resolve5051### Statements & metadata52- [ ] Data-availability statement with repository DOIs53- [ ] Competing-interest, authorship-contribution, funding, and AI-use declarations written54- [ ] Corresponding-author ORCID linked; all coauthors approved this version55- [ ] Suggested (and any opposed) reviewers entered; cover letter final (see `epsl-cover-letter`)5657## Bounce-at-upload gates5859| Gate | Pass condition | Fixed in |60|------|----------------|----------|61| Letters length | main text within cap | `epsl-writing-style` |62| Data statement | present, identifiers resolve | `epsl-reporting-and-reproducibility` |63| Declarations | COI / CRediT / funding / AI complete | this skill |64| Figure files | format, resolution, colormaps compliant | `epsl-figures-and-tables` |65| Article type | Letter (Frontiers only if invited) | `epsl-workflow` |6667## Worked micro-example (illustrative — the night-before pass on the slab-fluid Letter)6869- **Length:** main text 6,140 words introduction→conclusions — under the cap with margin for70 revision growth. Pass.71- **Data:** EarthChem DOI for the boron dataset resolves; the tomography model archived with a Zenodo72 DOI; both cited in the statement. Pass.73- **Declarations:** CRediT roles drafted per author; no competing interests; AI-use statement covers74 the language-editing tool per Elsevier policy.75- **The near-miss:** the supplement still cited "Figure S6," deleted two drafts ago — a broken76 internal reference reviewers reliably notice. Caught by a final cross-reference sweep.7778## Anti-patterns7980- Counting only the abstract-to-references span and discovering the cap violation after format checks81- "Data available on request" in the statement field82- Declarations copied from another journal's template with the wrong policy names83- Self-selecting the Frontiers type to look invited84- Uploading supplement and manuscript versions that disagree on a number8586## Output format8788```89【Length】main-text words vs cap (re-check) [count / cap]90【Files】manuscript + figures + supplement compliant? [Y/N]91【Data statement】DOIs resolve? [Y/N]92【Declarations】COI / CRediT / funding / AI / ORCID? [Y/N]93【Reviewers + cover letter】entered and final? [Y/N]94【Next】await decision → epsl-revision-and-rebuttal95```9697## Supplementary resources9899- [`templates/checklist.md`](templates/checklist.md) — the full itemized preflight100- [`templates/manuscript_template.md`](templates/manuscript_template.md) — a letters-format manuscript skeleton101- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — Guide for Authors and Editorial Manager entry links102103---104105**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-submission/SKILL.md`