Games And Economic Behavior

Games and Economic Behavior (games-and-economic-behavior)

Journal positioning

GEB is a leading journal for game theory and its applications, publishing strategic-behavior theory, mechanism and market design, and behavioral and computational game theory. It rewards papers with a genuine game-theoretic contribution — a new model, equilibrium result, mechanism, or analysis of strategic behavior — whether purely theoretical or applied. The readership spans economic theorists, computer scientists, and behavioral researchers who work on strategic interaction, so the strategic/game-theoretic core must be substantive.

This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live author instructions on the Elsevier site and the editorial submission system.

When to trigger

• The author names GEB as the target venue, or wants a home for a game-theory paper or its application.
• A theory paper's contribution is a strategic model, equilibrium result, or mechanism.
• A behavioral or computational paper needs re-framing so the game-theoretic contribution is foregrounded.
• The author needs GEB's desk-reject risks and a credible theory / mechanism-design alternative list.

Scope & topic fit

• Game theory: equilibrium concepts, dynamic and repeated games, information and signaling, bargaining.
• Mechanism design and market design: auctions, matching, allocation, and implementation.
• Behavioral game theory: bounded rationality, learning, and experimental tests of strategic models.
• Computational and algorithmic game theory, and applications of game theory across economics and related fields.

Method & evidence bar

• The game-theoretic contribution is the filter: clearly stated games, correct and complete equilibrium analysis, and results that generalize or illuminate strategic behavior.
• Mechanism/market-design papers need well-posed objectives and properties (incentive compatibility, efficiency, stability) proven, not asserted.
• Behavioral and experimental work must connect cleanly to a game-theoretic prediction and use appropriate design and inference.
• Computational contributions need correctness and a clear strategic/economic payoff, not just an algorithm.

Structure & house style

• The introduction states the strategic setting, the model, the main result, and its significance early, and explains the game-theoretic contribution.
• Position against the relevant game-theory / mechanism-design literature; relate assumptions and results to prior work explicitly.
• Uses an unstructured abstract and JEL codes; an appendix carries proofs, derivations, and (for experiments) instructions and procedures.
• Propositions and exhibits should be self-contained; the central result (theorem, mechanism property, or treatment effect) should be clearly stated.

Official-submission checklist

• Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the official source anchors for this journal family, then cite the current journal-specific page you checked.
• Search the live site for "Games and Economic Behavior guide for authors / submission guidelines" and follow the current Elsevier version.
• Re-check formatting, abstract/JEL requirements, anonymization, and proof/appendix conventions on the submission system.
• Re-check the current data and code / replication policy for any experimental or computational components.
• If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.

Pre-submission self-check

• One sentence stating the game-theoretic contribution and why it generalizes or illuminates strategic behavior.
• The contribution is stated as a model / equilibrium result / mechanism property, not as statistical significance.
• The introduction positions the paper against the current game-theory / mechanism-design frontier.
• Proofs are complete and correct; mechanism properties or experimental tests are rigorous.
• Appendix, derivations, and any experimental/computational materials are ready for the official policy.

Common desk-reject triggers

• A theory paper with incomplete proofs, fragile assumptions, or a non-general result.
• A mechanism-design paper that asserts rather than proves its properties.
• A behavioral/experimental paper with no clean game-theoretic prediction or weak design.
• A narrow application with no genuine strategic or game-theoretic contribution.

Re-routing decision

• General-interest at the top → american-economic-review; broad microeconomic theory → journal-of-economic-theory.
• Technically rigorous theory/econometrics general venue → international-economic-review; broad general field → european-economic-review.
• Experiment-centered work where design is the core → experimental-economics; IO/regulation applications of game theory → rand-journal-of-economics.

Output format

[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Games and Economic Behavior
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest topics>
[Method/evidence] <does the game-theoretic contribution clear GEB's bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <submission system / JEL / proofs-appendix / experiment materials / data-code>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → English-SocialScience-Journal-Skills/skills/games-and-economic-behavior/SKILL.md