Guidelines Advisor
Purpose
Systematically analyzes the codebase and provides guidance based on Trail of Bits' development guidelines:
- Generate documentation and specifications (plain English descriptions, architectural diagrams, code documentation)
- Optimize on-chain/off-chain architecture (only if applicable)
- Review upgradeability patterns (if your project has upgrades)
- Check delegatecall/proxy implementations (if present)
- Assess implementation quality (functions, inheritance, events)
- Identify common pitfalls
- Review dependencies
- Evaluate test suite and suggest improvements
Framework: Building Secure Contracts - Development Guidelines
How This Works
Phase 1: Discovery & Context
Explores the codebase to understand:
- Project structure and platform
- Contract/module files and their purposes
- Existing documentation
- Architecture patterns (proxies, upgrades, etc.)
- Testing setup
- Dependencies
Phase 2: Documentation Generation
Helps create:
- Plain English system description
- Architectural diagrams (using Slither printers for Solidity)
- Code documentation recommendations (NatSpec for Solidity)
Phase 3: Architecture Analysis
Analyzes:
- On-chain vs off-chain component distribution (if applicable)
- Upgradeability approach (if applicable)
- Delegatecall proxy patterns (if present)
Phase 4: Implementation Review
Assesses:
- Function composition and clarity
- Inheritance structure
- Event logging practices
- Common pitfalls presence
- Dependencies quality
- Testing coverage and techniques
Phase 5: Recommendations
Provides:
- Prioritized improvement suggestions
- Best practice guidance
- Actionable next steps
Assessment Areas
I analyze 11 comprehensive areas covering all aspects of smart contract development. For detailed criteria, best practices, and specific checks, see ASSESSMENT_AREAS.md.
Quick Reference:
Documentation & Specifications
- Plain English system descriptions
- Architectural diagrams
- NatSpec completeness (Solidity)
- Documentation gaps identification
On-Chain vs Off-Chain Computation
- Complexity analysis
- Gas optimization opportunities
- Verification vs computation patterns
Upgradeability
- Migration vs upgradeability trade-offs
- Data separation patterns
- Upgrade procedure documentation
Delegatecall Proxy Pattern
- Storage layout consistency
- Initialization patterns
- Function shadowing risks
- Slither upgradeability checks
Function Composition
- Function size and clarity
- Logical grouping
- Modularity assessment
Inheritance
- Hierarchy depth/width
- Diamond problem risks
- Inheritance visualization
Events
- Critical operation coverage
- Event naming consistency
- Indexed parameters
Common Pitfalls
- Reentrancy patterns
- Integer overflow/underflow
- Access control issues
- Platform-specific vulnerabilities
Dependencies
- Library quality assessment
- Version management
- Dependency manager usage
- Copied code detection
Testing & Verification
- Coverage analysis
- Fuzzing techniques
- Formal verification
- CI/CD integration
Platform-Specific Guidance
- Solidity version recommendations
- Compiler warning checks
- Inline assembly warnings
- Platform-specific tools
For complete details on each area including what I'll check, analyze, and recommend, see ASSESSMENT_AREAS.md.
Example Output
When the analysis is complete, you'll receive comprehensive guidance covering:
- System documentation with plain English descriptions
- Architectural diagrams and documentation gaps
- Architecture analysis (on-chain/off-chain, upgradeability, proxies)
- Implementation review (functions, inheritance, events, pitfalls)
- Dependencies and testing evaluation
- Prioritized recommendations (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW)
- Overall assessment and path to production
For a complete example analysis report, see EXAMPLE_REPORT.md.
Deliverables
I provide four comprehensive deliverable categories:
1. System Documentation
- Plain English descriptions
- Architectural diagrams
- Documentation gaps analysis
2. Architecture Analysis
- On-chain/off-chain assessment
- Upgradeability review
- Proxy pattern security review
3. Implementation Review
- Function composition analysis
- Inheritance assessment
- Events coverage
- Pitfall identification
- Dependencies evaluation
- Testing analysis
4. Prioritized Recommendations
- CRITICAL (address immediately)
- HIGH (address before deployment)
- MEDIUM (address for production quality)
- LOW (nice to have)
For detailed templates and examples of each deliverable, see DELIVERABLES.md.
Assessment Process
When invoked, I will:
Explore the codebase
- Identify all contract/module files
- Find existing documentation
- Locate test files
- Check for proxies/upgrades
- Identify dependencies
Generate documentation
- Create plain English system description
- Generate architectural diagrams (if tools available)
- Identify documentation gaps
Analyze architecture
- Assess on-chain/off-chain distribution (if applicable)
- Review upgradeability approach (if applicable)
- Audit proxy patterns (if present)
Review implementation
- Analyze functions, inheritance, events
- Check for common pitfalls
- Assess dependencies
- Evaluate testing
Provide recommendations
- Present findings with file references
- Ask clarifying questions about design decisions
- Suggest prioritized improvements
- Offer actionable next steps
Rationalizations (Do Not Skip)
| Rationalization |
Why It's Wrong |
Required Action |
| "System is simple, description covers everything" |
Plain English descriptions miss security-critical details |
Complete all 5 phases: documentation, architecture, implementation, dependencies, recommendations |
| "No upgrades detected, skip upgradeability section" |
Upgradeability can be implicit (ownable patterns, delegatecall) |
Search for proxy patterns, delegatecall, storage collisions before declaring N/A |
| "Not applicable" without verification |
Premature scope reduction misses vulnerabilities |
Verify with explicit codebase search before skipping any guideline section |
| "Architecture is straightforward, no analysis needed" |
Obvious architectures have subtle trust boundaries |
Analyze on-chain/off-chain distribution, access control flow, external dependencies |
| "Common pitfalls don't apply to this codebase" |
Every codebase has common pitfalls |
Systematically check all guideline pitfalls with grep/code search |
| "Tests exist, testing guideline is satisfied" |
Test existence ≠ test quality |
Check coverage, property-based tests, integration tests, failure cases |
| "I can provide generic best practices" |
Generic advice isn't actionable |
Provide project-specific findings with file:line references |
| "User knows what to improve from findings" |
Findings without prioritization = no action plan |
Generate prioritized improvement roadmap with specific next steps |
Notes
- I'll only analyze relevant sections (won't hallucinate about upgrades if not present)
- I'll adapt to your platform (Solidity, Rust, Cairo, etc.)
- I'll use available tools (Slither, etc.) but work without them if unavailable
- I'll provide file references and line numbers for all findings
- I'll ask questions about design decisions I can't infer from code
Ready to Begin
What I'll need:
- Access to your codebase
- Context about your project goals
- Any existing documentation or specifications
- Information about deployment plans
Let's analyze your codebase and improve it using Trail of Bits' best practices!
Source: trailofbits/skills → plugins/building-secure-contracts/skills/guidelines-advisor/SKILL.md
1---2name: guidelines-advisor3description: Smart contract development advisor based on Trail of Bits' best practices. Analyzes codebase to generate documentation/specifications, review architecture, check upgradeability patterns, assess implementation quality, identify pitfalls, review dependencies, and evaluate testing. Provides actionable recommendations.4---567# Guidelines Advisor89## Purpose1011Systematically analyzes the codebase and provides guidance based on Trail of Bits' development guidelines:12131. **Generate documentation and specifications** (plain English descriptions, architectural diagrams, code documentation)142. **Optimize on-chain/off-chain architecture** (only if applicable)153. **Review upgradeability patterns** (if your project has upgrades)164. **Check delegatecall/proxy implementations** (if present)175. **Assess implementation quality** (functions, inheritance, events)186. **Identify common pitfalls**197. **Review dependencies**208. **Evaluate test suite and suggest improvements**2122**Framework**: Building Secure Contracts - Development Guidelines2324---2526## How This Works2728### Phase 1: Discovery & Context29Explores the codebase to understand:30- Project structure and platform31- Contract/module files and their purposes32- Existing documentation33- Architecture patterns (proxies, upgrades, etc.)34- Testing setup35- Dependencies3637### Phase 2: Documentation Generation38Helps create:39- Plain English system description40- Architectural diagrams (using Slither printers for Solidity)41- Code documentation recommendations (NatSpec for Solidity)4243### Phase 3: Architecture Analysis44Analyzes:45- On-chain vs off-chain component distribution (if applicable)46- Upgradeability approach (if applicable)47- Delegatecall proxy patterns (if present)4849### Phase 4: Implementation Review50Assesses:51- Function composition and clarity52- Inheritance structure53- Event logging practices54- Common pitfalls presence55- Dependencies quality56- Testing coverage and techniques5758### Phase 5: Recommendations59Provides:60- Prioritized improvement suggestions61- Best practice guidance62- Actionable next steps6364---6566## Assessment Areas6768I analyze 11 comprehensive areas covering all aspects of smart contract development. For detailed criteria, best practices, and specific checks, see [ASSESSMENT_AREAS.md](resources/ASSESSMENT_AREAS.md).6970### Quick Reference:71721. **Documentation & Specifications**73 - Plain English system descriptions74 - Architectural diagrams75 - NatSpec completeness (Solidity)76 - Documentation gaps identification77782. **On-Chain vs Off-Chain Computation**79 - Complexity analysis80 - Gas optimization opportunities81 - Verification vs computation patterns82833. **Upgradeability**84 - Migration vs upgradeability trade-offs85 - Data separation patterns86 - Upgrade procedure documentation87884. **Delegatecall Proxy Pattern**89 - Storage layout consistency90 - Initialization patterns91 - Function shadowing risks92 - Slither upgradeability checks93945. **Function Composition**95 - Function size and clarity96 - Logical grouping97 - Modularity assessment98996. **Inheritance**100 - Hierarchy depth/width101 - Diamond problem risks102 - Inheritance visualization1031047. **Events**105 - Critical operation coverage106 - Event naming consistency107 - Indexed parameters1081098. **Common Pitfalls**110 - Reentrancy patterns111 - Integer overflow/underflow112 - Access control issues113 - Platform-specific vulnerabilities1141159. **Dependencies**116 - Library quality assessment117 - Version management118 - Dependency manager usage119 - Copied code detection12012110. **Testing & Verification**122 - Coverage analysis123 - Fuzzing techniques124 - Formal verification125 - CI/CD integration12612711. **Platform-Specific Guidance**128 - Solidity version recommendations129 - Compiler warning checks130 - Inline assembly warnings131 - Platform-specific tools132133For complete details on each area including what I'll check, analyze, and recommend, see [ASSESSMENT_AREAS.md](resources/ASSESSMENT_AREAS.md).134135---136137## Example Output138139When the analysis is complete, you'll receive comprehensive guidance covering:140141- System documentation with plain English descriptions142- Architectural diagrams and documentation gaps143- Architecture analysis (on-chain/off-chain, upgradeability, proxies)144- Implementation review (functions, inheritance, events, pitfalls)145- Dependencies and testing evaluation146- Prioritized recommendations (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW)147- Overall assessment and path to production148149For a complete example analysis report, see [EXAMPLE_REPORT.md](resources/EXAMPLE_REPORT.md).150151---152153## Deliverables154155I provide four comprehensive deliverable categories:156157### 1. System Documentation158- Plain English descriptions159- Architectural diagrams160- Documentation gaps analysis161162### 2. Architecture Analysis163- On-chain/off-chain assessment164- Upgradeability review165- Proxy pattern security review166167### 3. Implementation Review168- Function composition analysis169- Inheritance assessment170- Events coverage171- Pitfall identification172- Dependencies evaluation173- Testing analysis174175### 4. Prioritized Recommendations176- CRITICAL (address immediately)177- HIGH (address before deployment)178- MEDIUM (address for production quality)179- LOW (nice to have)180181For detailed templates and examples of each deliverable, see [DELIVERABLES.md](resources/DELIVERABLES.md).182183---184185## Assessment Process186187When invoked, I will:1881891. **Explore the codebase**190 - Identify all contract/module files191 - Find existing documentation192 - Locate test files193 - Check for proxies/upgrades194 - Identify dependencies1951962. **Generate documentation**197 - Create plain English system description198 - Generate architectural diagrams (if tools available)199 - Identify documentation gaps2002013. **Analyze architecture**202 - Assess on-chain/off-chain distribution (if applicable)203 - Review upgradeability approach (if applicable)204 - Audit proxy patterns (if present)2052064. **Review implementation**207 - Analyze functions, inheritance, events208 - Check for common pitfalls209 - Assess dependencies210 - Evaluate testing2112125. **Provide recommendations**213 - Present findings with file references214 - Ask clarifying questions about design decisions215 - Suggest prioritized improvements216 - Offer actionable next steps217218---219220## Rationalizations (Do Not Skip)221222| Rationalization | Why It's Wrong | Required Action |223|-----------------|----------------|-----------------|224| "System is simple, description covers everything" | Plain English descriptions miss security-critical details | Complete all 5 phases: documentation, architecture, implementation, dependencies, recommendations |225| "No upgrades detected, skip upgradeability section" | Upgradeability can be implicit (ownable patterns, delegatecall) | Search for proxy patterns, delegatecall, storage collisions before declaring N/A |226| "Not applicable" without verification | Premature scope reduction misses vulnerabilities | Verify with explicit codebase search before skipping any guideline section |227| "Architecture is straightforward, no analysis needed" | Obvious architectures have subtle trust boundaries | Analyze on-chain/off-chain distribution, access control flow, external dependencies |228| "Common pitfalls don't apply to this codebase" | Every codebase has common pitfalls | Systematically check all guideline pitfalls with grep/code search |229| "Tests exist, testing guideline is satisfied" | Test existence ≠ test quality | Check coverage, property-based tests, integration tests, failure cases |230| "I can provide generic best practices" | Generic advice isn't actionable | Provide project-specific findings with file:line references |231| "User knows what to improve from findings" | Findings without prioritization = no action plan | Generate prioritized improvement roadmap with specific next steps |232233---234235## Notes236237- I'll only analyze relevant sections (won't hallucinate about upgrades if not present)238- I'll adapt to your platform (Solidity, Rust, Cairo, etc.)239- I'll use available tools (Slither, etc.) but work without them if unavailable240- I'll provide file references and line numbers for all findings241- I'll ask questions about design decisions I can't infer from code242243---244245## Ready to Begin246247**What I'll need**:248- Access to your codebase249- Context about your project goals250- Any existing documentation or specifications251- Information about deployment plans252253Let's analyze your codebase and improve it using Trail of Bits' best practices!254255---256257**Source:** [`trailofbits/skills`](https://github.com/trailofbits/skills) → `plugins/building-secure-contracts/skills/guidelines-advisor/SKILL.md`