IMFER Workflow Router (imfer-workflow)
Overview
This is the router. It tells you which imfer- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at IMF Economic Review (IMFER) — the International Monetary Fund's flagship scholarly journal, published by Palgrave Macmillan / Springer Nature for the IMF, and the successor to IMF Staff Papers. IMFER's center of gravity is international macroeconomics and finance with strong policy relevance: exchange rates and capital flows, global imbalances, financial crises and contagion, sovereign debt, monetary and fiscal policy in open economies, IMF-program-relevant questions, and international spillovers. A distinctive pipeline is the Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference (ARC), whose papers often appear as IMFER special issues.
Operational tells you are at IMFER and not a sibling or generic field journal: the audience is part academic, part policy/institutional — a referee reads as both a frontier researcher and someone who could brief an IMF mission; review is double-blind (anonymize the main file); house style is the Chicago Manual of Style with American spelling; the abstract is italicized and JEL codes are required. Editor-in-chief as of 2026: Jesús Fernández-Villaverde (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). Re-verify volatile specifics on the Springer Nature IMFER pages.
When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?" on an IMFER-bound paper
- A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed (fit, design, theory, evidence, exhibits, style, submission)
- Work is ping-ponging between identification, the model, robustness, and the policy framing
- An IMFER decision letter arrived and the user must switch into revision mode
- The team is weighing IMFER against JIE, JIMF, JMCB, or Economic Policy
Routing table
| Current symptom |
Next skill |
| Question feels narrow / not clearly international-macro with policy relevance |
imfer-topic-selection |
| Contribution vs. JIE / JIMF / the IMF research frontier is fuzzy |
imfer-literature-positioning |
| Cross-country causal design or policy-surprise identification is shaky |
imfer-identification |
| The open-economy model / mechanism is loose or disconnected from the data |
imfer-theory-model |
| Results may be specification-, sample-, or country-composition-sensitive |
imfer-robustness |
| Exhibits are dense; significance asterisks still present; country coverage opaque |
imfer-tables-figures |
| Prose buries the policy implication; abstract/intro do not land for a mixed audience |
imfer-writing-style |
| Data, restricted IMF/central-bank paths, and code need packaging |
imfer-replication-package |
| Likely objections should be war-gamed before submission |
imfer-referee-strategy |
| Ready to submit via Editorial Manager; need a preflight |
imfer-submission |
| An R&R arrived; need a response-letter strategy |
imfer-rebuttal |
Default order
imfer-topic-selection — lock the international-macro question with a policy hook
imfer-literature-positioning — stake the contribution vs. JIE/JIMF and the IMF frontier
imfer-identification — cross-country / high-frequency / crisis-event identification
imfer-theory-model — open-economy model that disciplines or interprets the estimate
imfer-robustness — specification, sample, and country-composition stability
imfer-tables-figures — exhibits with transparent country coverage, no asterisks
imfer-writing-style — make the idea land for the dual academic/policy audience (intro last)
imfer-replication-package — assemble the data/code package with restricted-data paths
imfer-referee-strategy — anticipate the dual-referee objections
imfer-submission — Editorial Manager double-blind preflight
imfer-rebuttal — after the R&R
imfer-writing-style is a late polish; do not rewrite the intro before identification, the model, and robustness settle.
Routing by paper archetype
IMFER spans several international-macro branches; the binding constraint differs by archetype.
| Archetype |
Likely first bottleneck |
Enter at |
| cross-country panel (capital flows, debt, crises) |
country composition + spillover identification |
imfer-identification → imfer-robustness |
| high-frequency policy-surprise (monetary/FX, spillovers) |
clean surprise series + exclusion |
imfer-identification |
| open-economy DSGE / international-finance model |
parameter identification + counterfactual validity |
imfer-theory-model → imfer-identification |
| crisis event study / narrative |
event windows + confounding macro shocks |
imfer-identification → imfer-robustness |
| ARC / special-issue invited paper |
sharpening the policy contribution to the issue theme |
imfer-topic-selection → imfer-literature-positioning |
Worked routing example (illustrative)
A user says: "My cross-country panel shows capital-flow controls dampen crisis risk, but a referee says the result is driven by a handful of Asian economies and the controls are endogenous to the crisis." That is two distinct IMFER pushbacks — country-composition fragility (owned by imfer-robustness) and policy endogeneity (owned by imfer-identification). Route to identification first to defend the design, then to robustness to show the effect survives dropping the Asian bloc; only once the coefficient is stable do you return to imfer-tables-figures and imfer-rebuttal.
Anti-patterns
- Treating IMFER like JIE (pure international trade/finance theory-and-empirics, less policy framing) or JIMF (broader, faster, less selective)
- Polishing prose before identification, the model, and robustness are stable
- Letting the online appendix carry a claim the main text must establish
- Forgetting the policy "so what" — a clean estimate with no IMF-relevant implication reads as the wrong journal
- Leaving author-identifying traces in a double-blind main file
Minimal decision snippet
if decision_letter_arrived: -> imfer-rebuttal
elif ready_to_submit: -> imfer-submission
elif anticipating_referees: -> imfer-referee-strategy
elif data_code_packaging: -> imfer-replication-package
elif exhibits_or_significance: -> imfer-tables-figures
elif results_fragile: -> imfer-robustness
elif model_loose: -> imfer-theory-model
elif identification_shaky: -> imfer-identification
elif claim_or_positioning_fuzzy: -> imfer-contribution / imfer-literature-positioning
else: -> imfer-topic-selection
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → IMF-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/imfer-workflow/SKILL.md
1---2name: imfer-workflow3description: Use when deciding which imfer-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.4---5
6
7# IMFER Workflow Router (imfer-workflow)
8
9## Overview
10
11This is the router. It tells you **which imfer-* skill to use at the current stage** of a manuscript aimed at *IMF Economic Review* (IMFER) — the **International Monetary Fund's flagship scholarly journal**, published by **Palgrave Macmillan / Springer Nature** for the IMF, and the successor to *IMF Staff Papers*. IMFER's center of gravity is **international macroeconomics and finance with strong policy relevance**: exchange rates and capital flows, global imbalances, financial crises and contagion, sovereign debt, monetary and fiscal policy in open economies, IMF-program-relevant questions, and international spillovers. A distinctive pipeline is the **Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference (ARC)**, whose papers often appear as IMFER special issues.
12
13Operational tells you are at IMFER and not a sibling or generic field journal: the audience is **part academic, part policy/institutional** — a referee reads as both a frontier researcher and someone who could brief an IMF mission; review is **double-blind** (anonymize the main file); house style is the **Chicago Manual of Style** with American spelling; the abstract is italicized and **JEL codes** are required. Editor-in-chief as of 2026: **Jesús Fernández-Villaverde** (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). Re-verify volatile specifics on the Springer Nature IMFER pages.
14
15## When to trigger
16
17- The user asks "what should I do next?" on an IMFER-bound paper
18- A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed (fit, design, theory, evidence, exhibits, style, submission)
19- Work is ping-ponging between identification, the model, robustness, and the policy framing
20- An IMFER decision letter arrived and the user must switch into revision mode
21- The team is weighing IMFER against JIE, JIMF, JMCB, or *Economic Policy*
22
23## Routing table
24
25| Current symptom | Next skill |
26|-----------------|------------|
27| Question feels narrow / not clearly international-macro with policy relevance | `imfer-topic-selection` |
28| Contribution vs. JIE / JIMF / the IMF research frontier is fuzzy | `imfer-literature-positioning` |
29| Cross-country causal design or policy-surprise identification is shaky | `imfer-identification` |
30| The open-economy model / mechanism is loose or disconnected from the data | `imfer-theory-model` |
31| Results may be specification-, sample-, or country-composition-sensitive | `imfer-robustness` |
32| Exhibits are dense; significance asterisks still present; country coverage opaque | `imfer-tables-figures` |
33| Prose buries the policy implication; abstract/intro do not land for a mixed audience | `imfer-writing-style` |
34| Data, restricted IMF/central-bank paths, and code need packaging | `imfer-replication-package` |
35| Likely objections should be war-gamed before submission | `imfer-referee-strategy` |
36| Ready to submit via Editorial Manager; need a preflight | `imfer-submission` |
37| An R&R arrived; need a response-letter strategy | `imfer-rebuttal` |
38
39## Default order
40
411. `imfer-topic-selection` — lock the international-macro question with a policy hook
422. `imfer-literature-positioning` — stake the contribution vs. JIE/JIMF and the IMF frontier
433. `imfer-identification` — cross-country / high-frequency / crisis-event identification
444. `imfer-theory-model` — open-economy model that disciplines or interprets the estimate
455. `imfer-robustness` — specification, sample, and country-composition stability
466. `imfer-tables-figures` — exhibits with transparent country coverage, no asterisks
477. `imfer-writing-style` — make the idea land for the dual academic/policy audience (intro last)
488. `imfer-replication-package` — assemble the data/code package with restricted-data paths
499. `imfer-referee-strategy` — anticipate the dual-referee objections
5010. `imfer-submission` — Editorial Manager double-blind preflight
5111. `imfer-rebuttal` — after the R&R
52
53> `imfer-writing-style` is a late polish; do not rewrite the intro before identification, the model, and robustness settle.
54
55## Routing by paper archetype
56
57IMFER spans several international-macro branches; the binding constraint differs by archetype.
58
59| Archetype | Likely first bottleneck | Enter at |
60|-----------|-------------------------|----------|
61| cross-country panel (capital flows, debt, crises) | country composition + spillover identification | `imfer-identification` → `imfer-robustness` |
62| high-frequency policy-surprise (monetary/FX, spillovers) | clean surprise series + exclusion | `imfer-identification` |
63| open-economy DSGE / international-finance model | parameter identification + counterfactual validity | `imfer-theory-model` → `imfer-identification` |
64| crisis event study / narrative | event windows + confounding macro shocks | `imfer-identification` → `imfer-robustness` |
65| ARC / special-issue invited paper | sharpening the policy contribution to the issue theme | `imfer-topic-selection` → `imfer-literature-positioning` |
66
67## Worked routing example (illustrative)
68
69A user says: "My cross-country panel shows capital-flow controls dampen crisis risk, but a referee says the result is driven by a handful of Asian economies and the controls are endogenous to the crisis." That is two distinct IMFER pushbacks — *country-composition fragility* (owned by `imfer-robustness`) and *policy endogeneity* (owned by `imfer-identification`). Route to identification first to defend the design, then to robustness to show the effect survives dropping the Asian bloc; only once the coefficient is stable do you return to `imfer-tables-figures` and `imfer-rebuttal`.
70
71## Anti-patterns
72
73- Treating IMFER like JIE (pure international trade/finance theory-and-empirics, less policy framing) or JIMF (broader, faster, less selective)
74- Polishing prose before identification, the model, and robustness are stable
75- Letting the online appendix carry a claim the main text must establish
76- Forgetting the **policy "so what"** — a clean estimate with no IMF-relevant implication reads as the wrong journal
77- Leaving author-identifying traces in a double-blind main file
78
79## Minimal decision snippet
80
81```
82if decision_letter_arrived: -> imfer-rebuttal
83elif ready_to_submit: -> imfer-submission
84elif anticipating_referees: -> imfer-referee-strategy
85elif data_code_packaging: -> imfer-replication-package
86elif exhibits_or_significance: -> imfer-tables-figures
87elif results_fragile: -> imfer-robustness
88elif model_loose: -> imfer-theory-model
89elif identification_shaky: -> imfer-identification
90elif claim_or_positioning_fuzzy: -> imfer-contribution / imfer-literature-positioning
91else: -> imfer-topic-selection
92```
93
94---
95
96**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `IMF-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/imfer-workflow/SKILL.md`