Proposal & Symposium Pitch (jep-proposal-and-symposium)
When to trigger
- You have a JEP-fit topic (
jep-topic-selection) and need to approach the editors
- You are tempted to write a full unsolicited manuscript (don't — pitch first)
- You want to propose a symposium (a themed cluster of articles)
- An editor invited "a short proposal" and you need to know what goes in it
Why a proposal, not a manuscript
JEP articles are primarily solicited by the editorial team, and even unsolicited ideas should enter as a 2–5 page proposal, not a finished paper (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). Historically only about 10–15% of published articles originate as unsolicited proposals, so the proposal is the real competition — it must convince the editors that a broad, accessible, balanced article exists here and that you can write it. Send proposals and papers as Word or PDF email attachments to jep@aeapubs.org (re-confirm the address on the official page).
What a single-article proposal contains
A JEP proposal is a persuasive 2–5 page document, not an abstract. Cover, in plain language:
- The question and why it matters now — one paragraph a non-specialist editor grasps immediately (the
jep-topic-selection "why now").
- The synthesis you will deliver — what body of work you will distill and the through-line (not a chapter list). What will a reader understand after reading that they didn't before?
- Three to five takeaways — the memorable points the article will land. This is the spine; if you can't list them, the article isn't ready.
- Balance plan — the competing views/debates you will treat fairly, and the open questions you will flag (signals you are writing synthesis, not advocacy).
- Accessibility plan — how you will keep it readable by 90% of AEA members (intuition over notation; examples; selective evidence).
- Your standing to write it — why you can synthesize this fairly (often your own work plus command of the broader literature).
- Rough shape — approximate length and 2–4 exhibits you envision (not a full outline).
Symposium pitch (the JEP-distinctive move)
A symposium is 3–5 complementary articles on one theme, often by different authors, that together give a rounded view. To propose one:
- Frame the unifying question and why a multi-angle treatment beats a single article.
- Slate the angles (and, if you can, candidate authors) so the set is balanced — including dissenting or contrasting perspectives, not a like-minded panel.
- Differentiate each piece so they complement rather than overlap.
- Acknowledge the editors own the final lineup, framing, and invitations; you are offering a structure they can shape.
Checklist
Anti-patterns
- Submitting a full manuscript instead of a proposal (against JEP's stated preference)
- A proposal that is really an abstract — no through-line, no takeaways, no balance plan
- "I will survey everything" — JEP wants a curated argument, not exhaustive coverage (that's JEL)
- A symposium of like-minded authors that reads as a coordinated campaign, not a balanced conversation
- Over-promising length/scope the article cannot accessibly deliver
Output format
【Pitch type】single article / symposium
【Question + why now】[...]
【Synthesis through-line】[...]
【Takeaways (3–5)】1) … 2) … 3) …
【Balance plan】competing views to treat + open questions to flag
【Accessibility plan】[...]
【Symposium slate (if any)】angle1 / angle2 / angle3 (+ balance note)
【Send to】jep@aeapubs.org (re-confirm) as Word/PDF
【Next step】jep-narrative-arc (build the essay if invited)
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → Journal-of-Economic-Perspectives-Skills/skills/jep-proposal-and-symposium/SKILL.md
1---2name: jep-proposal-and-symposium3description: Use when crafting a proposal to the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) editors — a short article proposal or a symposium pitch — since JEP is largely invited and editor-organized. Builds the pitch and its contents; it does not write the full article or run the final submission preflight.4---567# Proposal & Symposium Pitch (jep-proposal-and-symposium)89## When to trigger1011- You have a JEP-fit topic (`jep-topic-selection`) and need to approach the editors12- You are tempted to write a full unsolicited manuscript (don't — pitch first)13- You want to propose a *symposium* (a themed cluster of articles)14- An editor invited "a short proposal" and you need to know what goes in it1516## Why a proposal, not a manuscript1718JEP articles are **primarily solicited by the editorial team**, and even unsolicited ideas should enter as a **2–5 page proposal**, not a finished paper (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). Historically only about **10–15%** of published articles originate as unsolicited proposals, so the proposal is the real competition — it must convince the editors that a *broad, accessible, balanced* article exists here and that *you* can write it. Send proposals and papers as Word or PDF email attachments to **jep@aeapubs.org** (re-confirm the address on the official page).1920## What a single-article proposal contains2122A JEP proposal is a persuasive 2–5 page document, not an abstract. Cover, in plain language:23241. **The question and why it matters now** — one paragraph a non-specialist editor grasps immediately (the `jep-topic-selection` "why now").252. **The synthesis you will deliver** — what body of work you will distill and the *through-line* (not a chapter list). What will a reader *understand* after reading that they didn't before?263. **Three to five takeaways** — the memorable points the article will land. This is the spine; if you can't list them, the article isn't ready.274. **Balance plan** — the competing views/debates you will treat fairly, and the open questions you will flag (signals you are writing synthesis, not advocacy).285. **Accessibility plan** — how you will keep it readable by 90% of AEA members (intuition over notation; examples; selective evidence).296. **Your standing to write it** — why you can synthesize this fairly (often your own work plus command of the broader literature).307. **Rough shape** — approximate length and 2–4 exhibits you envision (not a full outline).3132## Symposium pitch (the JEP-distinctive move)3334A symposium is **3–5 complementary articles** on one theme, often by different authors, that together give a rounded view. To propose one:3536- **Frame** the unifying question and why a multi-angle treatment beats a single article.37- **Slate** the angles (and, if you can, candidate authors) so the set is *balanced* — including dissenting or contrasting perspectives, not a like-minded panel.38- **Differentiate** each piece so they complement rather than overlap.39- **Acknowledge** the editors own the final lineup, framing, and invitations; you are offering a structure they can shape.4041## Checklist4243- [ ] Proposal is 2–5 pages, plain language, persuasive (not an abstract, not a manuscript)44- [ ] Question + "why now" stated in the first paragraph45- [ ] The synthesis through-line is explicit (not "I will review the literature")46- [ ] 3–5 concrete takeaways listed47- [ ] Balance + accessibility plans stated48- [ ] Symposium pitch (if any) names complementary, balanced angles and concedes editor control49- [ ] Addressed/emailed per the current official instructions (jep@aeapubs.org)5051## Anti-patterns5253- Submitting a **full manuscript** instead of a proposal (against JEP's stated preference)54- A proposal that is really an abstract — no through-line, no takeaways, no balance plan55- "I will survey everything" — JEP wants a curated argument, not exhaustive coverage (that's JEL)56- A symposium of like-minded authors that reads as a coordinated campaign, not a balanced conversation57- Over-promising length/scope the article cannot accessibly deliver5859## Output format6061```62【Pitch type】single article / symposium63【Question + why now】[...]64【Synthesis through-line】[...]65【Takeaways (3–5)】1) … 2) … 3) …66【Balance plan】competing views to treat + open questions to flag67【Accessibility plan】[...]68【Symposium slate (if any)】angle1 / angle2 / angle3 (+ balance note)69【Send to】jep@aeapubs.org (re-confirm) as Word/PDF70【Next step】jep-narrative-arc (build the essay if invited)71```7273---7475**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Journal-of-Economic-Perspectives-Skills/skills/jep-proposal-and-symposium/SKILL.md`