JFI Workflow Router (jfi-workflow)
When to trigger
- "I'm writing a JFI paper — where do I start?"
- You finished one stage and want the next jfi-* skill
- You are unsure whether your project is theory-led or empirics-led at JFI
What JFI is (orient first)
Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) is an Elsevier journal (ISSN 1042-9573) on banking,
financial intermediation, and the economics of financial institutions and markets. It publishes both
theory and empirics: bank behavior, intermediary frictions, corporate finance, regulation, and related
financial-economics topics. So the router first asks whether the paper's core contribution is a model
(theory) or an empirical design — this changes how jfi-identification-strategy,
jfi-data-analysis, and jfi-replication-and-data-policy are applied.
Routing map
| Where you are |
Next skill |
| Choosing / sharpening the question |
jfi-topic-selection |
| Placing it against the intermediation frontier |
jfi-literature-positioning |
| Empirical causal design OR theory assumptions/proofs |
jfi-identification-strategy |
| Running bank/loan-panel analysis OR numerical examples |
jfi-data-analysis |
| Articulating the mechanism / "why intermediaries matter" |
jfi-contribution-framing |
| Building exhibits |
jfi-tables-figures |
| Polishing prose, author–date style, numbered sections |
jfi-writing-style |
| Preparing Option C data sharing + Data Statement |
jfi-replication-and-data-policy |
| Understanding single-blind / desk-reject / final decision |
jfi-review-process |
| Final preflight + fee + abstract/keywords + AI disclosure |
jfi-submission |
| Responding to referees on an R&R |
jfi-rebuttal |
Default sequence
topic-selection → literature-positioning → identification-strategy → data-analysis →
contribution-framing → tables-figures → writing-style → replication-and-data-policy → review-process →
submission → rebuttal.
Two lifecycle profiles through this router
- Empirics-led (e.g., a register-based lending-channel paper): topic-selection settles the mechanism;
jfi-identification-strategy is the heaviest stop (demand confounds, within-firm design);
jfi-data-analysis builds the battery; jfi-review-process matters early, because the desk screen
is the binding constraint, not the referee round.
- Theory-led (e.g., a model of run-prone shadow funding):
jfi-identification-strategy becomes
assumptions-and-propositions discipline; jfi-data-analysis shrinks to a numerical illustration;
jfi-writing-style carries more weight, since proof exposition is the surface the referee actually
reads.
Symptom → skill routing
| Symptom |
Route to |
| "A referee could say it's all borrower demand" |
jfi-identification-strategy |
| Abstract reads like generic banking |
jfi-contribution-framing |
| Closest citations are all JF/JFE general finance |
jfi-literature-positioning, then re-test fit |
| Exhibits do not show the mechanism |
jfi-tables-figures |
| Worried about paying the non-refundable fee |
jfi-review-process + the gates in jfi-submission |
| Restricted register data, sharing plan unclear |
jfi-replication-and-data-policy |
Stage gates before money and goodwill are spent
- Gate A (after literature-positioning): the delta is a mechanism, not merely a new dataset.
- Gate B (after identification/data-analysis): a within-firm or equivalent demand control exists, or
the theory's propositions are fully proved with stated boundaries.
- Gate C (before submission): the desk-screen self-audit passes — mechanism in the abstract, design
defended in the introduction, the <=250-word abstract and 1-7 English keywords are ready, and the
US$500 new-submission fee is justified. Re-confirm fees against the journal's current author
guidelines before filing.
A routing pass, worked (illustrative)
An author arrives with loan-level evidence that small banks cut credit after a deposit outflow.
jfi-topic-selection: strong fit once anchored to liquidity transformation. jfi-literature-positioning:
closest papers are the deposits-channel line; the delta is the relationship-borrower margin.
jfi-identification-strategy: outflow exposure may proxy local demand — gate B forces a within-firm
design before any drafting continues. jfi-data-analysis: battery planned around that threat. Only then
do framing, exhibits, and style run, and jfi-submission clears the fee gates. The router's value is
refusing to let writing start before gate B — at JFI the design objection, not the prose, kills papers.
On an R&R, re-enter the map at the skill matching the referee's heaviest comment, then exit via
jfi-rebuttal.
Anti-patterns
- Treating JFI as purely empirical when your contribution is a model (or vice versa)
- Skipping
jfi-review-process and being surprised by desk-rejection or a narrow appeal path
- Forgetting the US$500 fee until
jfi-submission — see the source map and re-confirm before filing
Output format
【Stage】<your current stage>
【Paper type】theory / empirical / both
【Next skill】jfi-<role>
【Then】<the one after>
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → Journal-of-Financial-Intermediation-Skills/skills/jfi-workflow/SKILL.md
1---2name: jfi-workflow3description: Use when routing a Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) manuscript through its lifecycle — given where you are in the banking/intermediation paper pipeline, it names the next jfi-* skill to invoke and separates the theory-led path from the empirics-led path. It coordinates; it does not draft content.4---567# JFI Workflow Router (jfi-workflow)89## When to trigger1011- "I'm writing a JFI paper — where do I start?"12- You finished one stage and want the next jfi-* skill13- You are unsure whether your project is theory-led or empirics-led at JFI1415## What JFI is (orient first)1617Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) is an **Elsevier** journal (ISSN 1042-9573) on **banking,18financial intermediation, and the economics of financial institutions and markets**. It publishes **both19theory and empirics**: bank behavior, intermediary frictions, corporate finance, regulation, and related20financial-economics topics. So the router first asks whether the paper's core contribution is a **model21(theory)** or an **empirical design** — this changes how `jfi-identification-strategy`,22`jfi-data-analysis`, and `jfi-replication-and-data-policy` are applied.2324## Routing map2526| Where you are | Next skill |27|---|---|28| Choosing / sharpening the question | `jfi-topic-selection` |29| Placing it against the intermediation frontier | `jfi-literature-positioning` |30| Empirical causal design OR theory assumptions/proofs | `jfi-identification-strategy` |31| Running bank/loan-panel analysis OR numerical examples | `jfi-data-analysis` |32| Articulating the mechanism / "why intermediaries matter" | `jfi-contribution-framing` |33| Building exhibits | `jfi-tables-figures` |34| Polishing prose, author–date style, numbered sections | `jfi-writing-style` |35| Preparing Option C data sharing + Data Statement | `jfi-replication-and-data-policy` |36| Understanding single-blind / desk-reject / final decision | `jfi-review-process` |37| Final preflight + fee + abstract/keywords + AI disclosure | `jfi-submission` |38| Responding to referees on an R&R | `jfi-rebuttal` |3940## Default sequence4142topic-selection → literature-positioning → identification-strategy → data-analysis →43contribution-framing → tables-figures → writing-style → replication-and-data-policy → review-process →44submission → rebuttal.4546## Two lifecycle profiles through this router4748- **Empirics-led** (e.g., a register-based lending-channel paper): topic-selection settles the mechanism;49 `jfi-identification-strategy` is the heaviest stop (demand confounds, within-firm design);50 `jfi-data-analysis` builds the battery; `jfi-review-process` matters **early**, because the desk screen51 is the binding constraint, not the referee round.52- **Theory-led** (e.g., a model of run-prone shadow funding): `jfi-identification-strategy` becomes53 assumptions-and-propositions discipline; `jfi-data-analysis` shrinks to a numerical illustration;54 `jfi-writing-style` carries more weight, since proof exposition is the surface the referee actually55 reads.5657## Symptom → skill routing5859| Symptom | Route to |60|---|---|61| "A referee could say it's all borrower demand" | `jfi-identification-strategy` |62| Abstract reads like generic banking | `jfi-contribution-framing` |63| Closest citations are all JF/JFE general finance | `jfi-literature-positioning`, then re-test fit |64| Exhibits do not show the mechanism | `jfi-tables-figures` |65| Worried about paying the non-refundable fee | `jfi-review-process` + the gates in `jfi-submission` |66| Restricted register data, sharing plan unclear | `jfi-replication-and-data-policy` |6768## Stage gates before money and goodwill are spent69701. **Gate A** (after literature-positioning): the delta is a mechanism, not merely a new dataset.712. **Gate B** (after identification/data-analysis): a within-firm or equivalent demand control exists, or72 the theory's propositions are fully proved with stated boundaries.733. **Gate C** (before submission): the desk-screen self-audit passes — mechanism in the abstract, design74 defended in the introduction, the <=250-word abstract and 1-7 English keywords are ready, and the75 US$500 new-submission fee is justified. Re-confirm fees against the journal's current author76 guidelines before filing.7778## A routing pass, worked (illustrative)7980An author arrives with loan-level evidence that small banks cut credit after a deposit outflow.81`jfi-topic-selection`: strong fit once anchored to liquidity transformation. `jfi-literature-positioning`:82closest papers are the deposits-channel line; the delta is the relationship-borrower margin.83`jfi-identification-strategy`: outflow exposure may proxy local demand — gate B forces a within-firm84design before any drafting continues. `jfi-data-analysis`: battery planned around that threat. Only then85do framing, exhibits, and style run, and `jfi-submission` clears the fee gates. The router's value is86refusing to let writing start before gate B — at JFI the design objection, not the prose, kills papers.87On an R&R, re-enter the map at the skill matching the referee's heaviest comment, then exit via88`jfi-rebuttal`.8990## Anti-patterns9192- Treating JFI as purely empirical when your contribution is a model (or vice versa)93- Skipping `jfi-review-process` and being surprised by desk-rejection or a narrow appeal path94- Forgetting the US$500 fee until `jfi-submission` — see the source map and re-confirm before filing9596## Output format9798```99【Stage】<your current stage>100【Paper type】theory / empirical / both101【Next skill】jfi-<role>102【Then】<the one after>103```104105---106107**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Journal-of-Financial-Intermediation-Skills/skills/jfi-workflow/SKILL.md`