Review of Finance Workflow Router (rof-workflow)
Overview
This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill; it tells you which rof- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at the Review of Finance (RoF) — the official journal of the European Finance Association (EFA), published by Oxford University Press, covering general-interest empirical and theoretical finance at the level of the top-three finance journals. Operational tells: Editorial Express submission, a real fee (EUR 350 / EUR 300 EFA members) plus an optional Fast-Track (EUR 900, 14-day decision), double-blind review, a two-round decision philosophy, a hard 60-page cap (incl. appendices, bibliography, figures, tables), a 150-word abstract, Chicago citations, and a Code Sharing and Data Availability Policy. Re-verify volatile specifics on the official pages.
When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?"
- The user hands over a draft and needs the current bottleneck diagnosed
- An RoF decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
Routing table
| Current symptom |
Next skill |
| Idea feels small / not obviously top-finance material |
rof-topic-selection |
| "So what?" / contribution to finance is fuzzy or undersold |
rof-contribution-framing |
| Placement against the finance frontier is unclear; citations thin |
rof-literature-positioning |
| Causal claim (empirical) or assumptions/results (theory) are undefended |
rof-identification-strategy |
| Estimation, sample, variable construction, or robustness is the weak link |
rof-data-analysis |
| Tables are dense; exhibits blow the 60-page budget |
rof-tables-figures |
| Prose buries the idea; abstract/intro do not land in 150 words |
rof-writing-style |
| Need the replication package / Data Availability Statement |
rof-replication-and-data-policy |
| Want to understand referee standards / two-round logic before submitting |
rof-review-process |
| Ready to submit via Editorial Express; need a preflight + fee decision |
rof-submission |
| Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategy |
rof-rebuttal |
Default order
rof-topic-selection → 2. rof-contribution-framing → 3. rof-literature-positioning → 4. rof-identification-strategy (causal design, or theory assumptions/results) → 5. rof-data-analysis (estimation/robustness, or numerical work) → 6. rof-tables-figures (within the 60-page cap) → 7. rof-writing-style (abstract ≤150 words, intro last) → 8. rof-replication-and-data-policy → 9. rof-review-process → 10. rof-submission (Editorial Express; regular vs. Fast-Track) → 11. rof-rebuttal (after the R&R).
rof-writing-style is a late-stage polish. Do not rewrite the intro before identification/results are settled.
Stage gates — exit criteria before advancing
Do not move down the default order until the current gate clears; the two-round philosophy makes pre-submission completeness the whole game.
Gate A idea question survives the top-three-interest test ... rof-topic-selection
Gate B claim one-sentence quantified contribution stands ..... rof-contribution-framing
Gate C placement 3-6 closest papers named, delta stated for each . rof-literature-positioning
Gate D credibility identification or theory spine survives attack .. rof-identification-strategy
Gate E evidence magnitudes economic; robustness mapped to files . rof-data-analysis
Gate F package <=60 pages incl. everything; abstract <=150 ..... rof-tables-figures / rof-writing-style
Gate G compliance DAS + code/pseudo-data + disclosures drafted .... rof-replication-and-data-policy / rof-submission
PAY THE FEE ONLY AFTER GATE G.
Sequencing around the EFA circuit and the fee
- RoF is the EFA's house journal: presenting at the EFA annual meeting (or a comparable European finance conference) before paying the fee is the cheapest way to surface the bucket-1 objections referees will raise.
- Choose Fast-Track (EUR 900, 14-day target) only for a finished paper under competitive pressure — e.g., several teams exploiting the same regulatory shock; a paper still failing Gate D or E burns the premium.
- Front-load the heavy robustness battery before first submission: under the two-round philosophy there is no "save it for the revision" reserve, because round two is for closing, not opening, issues.
- Build the replication package in parallel with Gate E rather than after acceptance — the Code Sharing and Data Availability Policy can delay publication until programs arrive, and proprietary-data exceptions must already be requested in the initial cover letter (Gate G).
- Re-verify fee, refund, and policy specifics against the journal's current author guidelines before paying anything.
Anti-patterns
- Do not skip
rof-contribution-framing and jump to estimation — RoF judges the finance contribution first.
- Do not ignore the 60-page cap until the end — it includes appendices, bibliography, figures, and tables.
- Do not draft a rebuttal before the revised manuscript exists; the two-round philosophy makes round one decisive.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → Review-of-Finance-Skills/skills/rof-workflow/SKILL.md
1---2name: rof-workflow3description: Use when deciding which rof-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Finance (RoF) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.4---5
6
7# Review of Finance Workflow Router (rof-workflow)
8
9## Overview
10
11This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill; it tells you **which rof-* skill to use at the current stage** of a manuscript aimed at the *Review of Finance* (RoF) — the **official journal of the European Finance Association (EFA)**, published by **Oxford University Press**, covering **general-interest empirical and theoretical finance at the level of the top-three finance journals**. Operational tells: **Editorial Express** submission, a **real fee (EUR 350 / EUR 300 EFA members)** plus an optional **Fast-Track** (EUR 900, **14-day** decision), **double-blind** review, a **two-round decision philosophy**, a **hard 60-page cap** (incl. appendices, bibliography, figures, tables), a **150-word abstract**, **Chicago** citations, and a **Code Sharing and Data Availability Policy**. Re-verify volatile specifics on the official pages.
12
13## When to trigger
14
15- The user asks "what should I do next?"
16- The user hands over a draft and needs the current bottleneck diagnosed
17- An RoF decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
18
19## Routing table
20
21| Current symptom | Next skill |
22|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
23| Idea feels small / not obviously top-finance material | `rof-topic-selection` |
24| "So what?" / contribution to finance is fuzzy or undersold | `rof-contribution-framing` |
25| Placement against the finance frontier is unclear; citations thin | `rof-literature-positioning` |
26| Causal claim (empirical) or assumptions/results (theory) are undefended | `rof-identification-strategy` |
27| Estimation, sample, variable construction, or robustness is the weak link| `rof-data-analysis` |
28| Tables are dense; exhibits blow the 60-page budget | `rof-tables-figures` |
29| Prose buries the idea; abstract/intro do not land in 150 words | `rof-writing-style` |
30| Need the replication package / Data Availability Statement | `rof-replication-and-data-policy`|
31| Want to understand referee standards / two-round logic before submitting | `rof-review-process` |
32| Ready to submit via Editorial Express; need a preflight + fee decision | `rof-submission` |
33| Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategy | `rof-rebuttal` |
34
35## Default order
36
371. `rof-topic-selection` → 2. `rof-contribution-framing` → 3. `rof-literature-positioning` → 4. `rof-identification-strategy` (causal design, or theory assumptions/results) → 5. `rof-data-analysis` (estimation/robustness, or numerical work) → 6. `rof-tables-figures` (within the 60-page cap) → 7. `rof-writing-style` (abstract ≤150 words, intro last) → 8. `rof-replication-and-data-policy` → 9. `rof-review-process` → 10. `rof-submission` (Editorial Express; regular vs. Fast-Track) → 11. `rof-rebuttal` (after the R&R).
38
39> `rof-writing-style` is a late-stage polish. Do not rewrite the intro before identification/results are settled.
40
41## Stage gates — exit criteria before advancing
42
43Do not move down the default order until the current gate clears; the two-round philosophy makes pre-submission completeness the whole game.
44
45```text
46Gate A idea question survives the top-three-interest test ... rof-topic-selection
47Gate B claim one-sentence quantified contribution stands ..... rof-contribution-framing
48Gate C placement 3-6 closest papers named, delta stated for each . rof-literature-positioning
49Gate D credibility identification or theory spine survives attack .. rof-identification-strategy
50Gate E evidence magnitudes economic; robustness mapped to files . rof-data-analysis
51Gate F package <=60 pages incl. everything; abstract <=150 ..... rof-tables-figures / rof-writing-style
52Gate G compliance DAS + code/pseudo-data + disclosures drafted .... rof-replication-and-data-policy / rof-submission
53PAY THE FEE ONLY AFTER GATE G.
54```
55
56## Sequencing around the EFA circuit and the fee
57
58- RoF is the EFA's house journal: presenting at the EFA annual meeting (or a comparable European finance conference) before paying the fee is the cheapest way to surface the bucket-1 objections referees will raise.
59- Choose Fast-Track (EUR 900, 14-day target) only for a finished paper under competitive pressure — e.g., several teams exploiting the same regulatory shock; a paper still failing Gate D or E burns the premium.
60- Front-load the heavy robustness battery before first submission: under the two-round philosophy there is no "save it for the revision" reserve, because round two is for closing, not opening, issues.
61- Build the replication package in parallel with Gate E rather than after acceptance — the Code Sharing and Data Availability Policy can delay publication until programs arrive, and proprietary-data exceptions must already be requested in the initial cover letter (Gate G).
62- Re-verify fee, refund, and policy specifics against the journal's current author guidelines before paying anything.
63
64## Anti-patterns
65
66- **Do not** skip `rof-contribution-framing` and jump to estimation — RoF judges the finance contribution first.
67- **Do not** ignore the 60-page cap until the end — it includes appendices, bibliography, figures, and tables.
68- **Do not** draft a rebuttal before the revised manuscript exists; the two-round philosophy makes round one decisive.
69
70---
71
72**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Review-of-Finance-Skills/skills/rof-workflow/SKILL.md`
thedixitjain