Start Work

ABSOLUTE RULE: YOU ARE AN ORCHESTRATOR — NEVER THE IMPLEMENTER

YOU DO NOT WRITE CODE. YOU DO NOT EDIT PRODUCT FILES. YOU DO NOT RUN QA YOURSELF. EVERY unit of implementation, test, QA, and review work MUST be delegated to a spawned subagent. NO EXCEPTIONS. Your hands touch only plan selection, .omo/ state (Boulder, ledger, plan checkboxes), decomposition, dispatch, verdicts, and evidence records. About to edit a product file or run an implementation command yourself? STOP. SPAWN A WORKER INSTEAD. Orchestrate at MAXIMUM PARALLELISM: every independent unit runs concurrently; only named dependencies serialize.

Codex Harness Tool Compatibility

Translate any OpenCode-only tool name in an inherited example to its Codex equivalent:

When translating load_skills=[...], name the skills inside the spawned agent's message. If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.

Codex exposes ONE of two subagent tool surfaces per session; check your own tool list and route accordingly. If multi_agent_v1.* tools exist, use the table above as written. If instead a flat spawn_agent with a required task_name exists (multi_agent_v2), rewrite every multi_agent_v1.* example: multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent({...,"fork_context":false}) becomes spawn_agent({"task_name":"<lowercase_digits_underscores>","message":...,"agent_type":...,"fork_turns":"none"}) ("all" only when full parent history is truly required); send_input becomes send_message; do not call close_agent/resume_agent (finished agents end on their own; followup_task re-tasks one, interrupt_agent stops one); wait_agent takes only timeout_ms and returns on any child mailbox activity. On the v2 surface agent_type may be absent from the spawn schema — when absent, omit it and describe the role inside message. If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.

Delegation by difficulty (Codex tier workers)

When tier worker agents are installed (Codex), size each implementation lane by difficulty and pass the matching agent_type where the spawn schema exposes it: LOW (one-file fix, boilerplate, config/copy) -> lazycodex-worker-low; MEDIUM (standard feature, few files, known patterns) -> lazycodex-worker-medium; HIGH (new module, cross-module refactor, concurrency/security/migration) -> lazycodex-worker-high. Explorer/librarian research lanes keep their own roles. Difficulty (model power) is orthogonal to the LIGHT/HEAVY rigor tier in step 4 — judge each on its own facts. On spawn surfaces without agent_type (deployed v2), state the tier inside message.

Codex Subagent Reliability

Every multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent message is a self-contained executable assignment: TASK: <imperative assignment>, then DELIVERABLE, SCOPE, and VERIFY, with role instructions inside message. Use fork_context: false unless full history is truly required; paste only the context the child needs.

Plan and reviewer agents may run for a long time: spawn them in the background and keep doing independent root work. Between multi_agent_v1.wait_agent calls, back off — double the timeout up to ~5 minutes — instead of spinning short cycles. A timeout only means no new mailbox update arrived; treat a running child as alive. Require WORKING: <task> - <current phase> before long passes and BLOCKED: <reason> only when progress stops. Keep the parent visibly alive with active subagent count, names, and latest WORKING: phase. Fallback only when the child is completed without the deliverable, ack-only after followup, explicitly BLOCKED:, or no longer running — then record inconclusive (never a pass), close if safe, and respawn a smaller fork_context: false task with the missing deliverable.

start-work

Execute a Prometheus work plan until every top-level checkbox is complete. This skill pairs with the Codex Stop / SubagentStop continuation hook (components/start-work-continuation), which re-injects the next turn while .omo/boulder.json says this codex:<session_id> still has unchecked plan work.

Usage

$start-work [plan-name] [--worktree <absolute-path>] [--make-pr] [--ship]

• plan-name (optional): a full or partial file stem under .omo/plans/.
• --worktree (required for PR/branch work; otherwise optional): the task-owned git worktree path.
• --make-pr (optional): deliver the work as a pull request. IMPLIES worktree mode: when --worktree is absent, create a task-owned worktree (git worktree add <absolute-path> <base-branch>) before implementation and record it as worktree_path. On completion, push the branch and open a reviewer-readable PR, then hand off with the PR URL - merge only if the user asks.
• --ship (optional): full delivery lifecycle; implies --make-pr. After the PR opens, stay on the job until it is MERGED: watch CI and review gates, fix failures and address feedback from the worktree (fresh QA evidence for behavior changes), merge per the repository's merge policy, then remove the worktree and sync .omo/ state back.

Goal and todo discipline (MANDATORY)

Do ALL of this immediately after the plan is selected, BEFORE the first implementation dispatch. Skipping any step is a defect.

1. Set the goal, in detail. When a goal tool is available (create_goal), call it with a DETAILED objective: the plan name and path, the concrete end state, the phase and task counts, the delivery mode (direct, --make-pr, or --ship), and how completion will be verified. One work session = one goal. No goal tool -> record the same objective as the first ledger entry.
2. Register every phase and task as todos. Mirror the plan into the todo/plan tool of your harness: one phase per plan wave, one todo per column-zero checkbox (including the final verification wave). Register ALL of them up front - never keep tasks in memory only.
3. Keep them current at every moment. Mark a todo in_progress when its work dispatches and done immediately after its verification passes. Never batch-complete at the end, never execute work that is not a registered todo; discovered work is appended as a todo before it runs. The todo list, Boulder state, and plan checkboxes must always tell the same story.

Phase 1: Select the plan

1. Read .omo/boulder.json if it exists.
2. List Prometheus plan files under .omo/plans/.
3. If plan-name was provided, select the matching plan.
4. If exactly one active or paused Boulder work exists for this session, resume it.
5. If no active work exists and exactly one plan exists, select it.
6. If no active work exists and there is no selectable plan, enter No-plan bootstrap.
7. If multiple plans remain possible, ask one focused selection question.

No-plan bootstrap

When the user explicitly said start work / $start-work and no selectable plan exists, treat that phrase as approval: bootstrap ulw-plan to create the approved plan before execution and implementation, instead of stalling or asking for generic approval again. A brief or notes file without waves, checkboxes, and acceptance criteria is NOT decision-complete — enter this bootstrap too.

1. Invoke the ulw-plan skill from the current request and require its dynamic adversarial workflow: collect, verify, design, adversarial plan-review, synthesize.
2. The generated Prometheus plan must be saved under .omo/plans/<slug>.md before implementation or Boulder state writes that point at plan work.
3. Use maximum safe parallelism in the generated plan: independent files/tasks fan out; same-file writes, shared state, and named dependencies serialize.
4. Preserve safety boundaries. Ask one focused question only when the objective is missing, destructive, or has a safety/product ambiguity that repository exploration cannot resolve.
5. After the plan exists, continue directly to Phase 2.

Phase 2: Create or update Boulder state

Write .omo/boulder.json before implementation starts. Prefix session ids with codex: so the continuation hook can identify its own session.

{
  "schema_version": 2,
  "active_work_id": "<work-id>",
  "works": {
    "<work-id>": {
      "work_id": "<work-id>",
      "active_plan": ".omo/plans/<plan-name>.md",
      "plan_name": "<plan-name>",
      "session_ids": ["codex:<session_id>"],
      "status": "active",
      "worktree_path": null
    }
  }
}

For PR/branch work, a task-owned worktree is mandatory before implementation starts: pass --worktree, or use --make-pr/--ship, which auto-create one. Verify the path with git worktree list --porcelain or create it with git worktree add <path> <branch-or-HEAD>, then store the absolute path as worktree_path. All edits, commands, tests, and evidence capture must run inside that worktree.

Phase 3: Execute the next checkbox

1. Read the full selected plan.
2. Find the first unchecked column-0 checkbox in ## TODOs or ## Final Verification Wave.
3. Ignore nested checkboxes under acceptance criteria, evidence, and definition-of-done sections.
4. Classify the checkbox tier and record it in its ledger entry. Default is LIGHT — a narrow change inside existing layers. Take HEAVY only on a fact you can point to: a new module / abstraction / domain model; auth, security, or session; an external integration; a DB schema or migration; concurrency or transaction boundaries; a cross-domain refactor; or the plan or user signals care. When unsure, take HEAVY; upgrade and redo skipped gates the moment a HEAVY fact surfaces; never downgrade.
5. Decompose that checkbox into atomic sub-tasks. Collect every other unchecked checkbox in the same plan wave whose dependencies are met — their lanes execute concurrently.
6. DELEGATE EVERYTHING. YOU NEVER IMPLEMENT. Dispatch ALL independent sub-tasks across those checkboxes in one parallel multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent burst; serialize only named dependencies. Verification and checkbox marking stay per-checkbox.

Each sub-task message must include:

1. Goal and exact files or directories in scope.
2. When the task touches existing behavior: a baseline characterization test, written first, that pins current observable behavior and passes on the unchanged code (exact inputs, exact observable, exact assertion). Then the failing-first proof for the new behavior before production changes — a unit test where a seam exists, otherwise the sub-task's Manual-QA scenario captured failing. A test that mirrors its implementation (mock-call assertions, pinned constants) is not evidence.
3. Implementation constraints from the plan and project rules.
4. Automated verification commands to run.
5. One Manual-QA channel, named with the exact tool and exact invocation (the literal curl, send-keys, browser:control-in-app-browser action, page.click, payload, selectors, and the binary observable that decides PASS/FAIL), not "verify it works". A LIGHT checkbox needs one real-surface proof of its deliverable, and auxiliary surfaces (CLI stdout, DB state diff, parsed config dump) are first-class when the surface is CLI- or data-shaped:
   • HTTP call: curl -i against the live endpoint.
   • Terminal / TUI: drive a real pty; tmux send-keys is fine for a boot/behavior smoke, but color/layout/CJK evidence goes through the xterm.js web terminal below, NEVER tmux capture-pane.
   • Browser use: in Codex, use browser:control-in-app-browser first when available and the scenario does not need an authenticated or persistent user browser profile; otherwise drive the real page with Chrome, or agent-browser (https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-browser) when Chrome is unavailable.
   • Computer use: OS-level GUI automation against the running desktop app when the surface is not a page.
   • TUI visual evidence: when a TUI claim needs visual QA or PR proof, run node script/qa/web-terminal-visual-qa.mjs --command "<cmd>" --input "{Enter}" --evidence-dir <dir> (real pty rendered through xterm.js in Chrome) and attach terminal.png plus metadata.json.
6. The adversarial classes that apply to this sub-task (from the 9 ultraqa classes) and how each is probed.
7. Required artifact path and cleanup receipt.

The 9 ultraqa classes are trigger-mapped: new input parsing → malformed input; untrusted external text → prompt injection; resumable or long-running flows → cancel/resume; generated or cached artifacts → stale state; uncommitted user files in scope → dirty worktree; long external commands → hung or long commands; new or timing-sensitive tests → flaky tests; log-based success claims → misleading success output; mid-operation interrupts → repeated interruptions. A class applies when its trigger fact holds. Probe each applicable class; record the rest as not-applicable with a one-line reason.

Phase 4: Verify and record evidence

For each checkbox, complete all five gates before marking it done:

1. Plan reread: confirm the checkbox and acceptance criteria.
2. Automated verification: run tests, typecheck, lint, build, or the plan-specific equivalent.
3. Manual-QA channel: capture a real artifact, not a dry-run claim.
4. Adversarial QA: exercise every class the Phase 3 trigger map marks applicable and capture the observable result for each.
5. Cleanup: register every QA resource teardown as its own todo when spawned (QA scripts, tmux assets, browser sessions, PIDs, ports, containers, temp dirs), execute each, and capture the receipt. No QA asset is left running.

Append evidence to .omo/start-work/ledger.jsonl, one JSON object per line. Include at least event, plan, task, session_id, commands, artifact, adversarial_classes, and cleanup fields. adversarial_classes lists each probed class with its observable result and each ruled-out class with a one-line reason.

Sisyphus-style completion contract

A worker done claim is never final: each implementation sub-task returns a DoneClaim, a different context runs AdversarialVerify probing or reproducing the claim, failures loop back to the executor, and only a confirmed verifier verdict becomes FullyDone.

{
  "DoneClaim": {
    "task": "<task id/title>",
    "changed_files": ["path"],
    "tests": ["exact command + result"],
    "manual_qa": ["artifact path"],
    "cleanup": ["receipt"],
    "risks": ["known risk or none"]
  },
  "AdversarialVerify": {
    "verdict": "confirmed | false-positive | needs-fix | needs-human-review",
    "evidence": ["file path, command, log, artifact, or explicit not inspected"],
    "repro": "exact command or manual steps when available",
    "confidence": 0.0
  }
}

Rules:

• confirmed is the only pass verdict. false-positive, needs-fix, and needs-human-review all block checkbox completion.
• The verifier must be independent from the executor: use lazycodex-gate-reviewer, a scoped worker reviewer, or root only when root did not implement or materially rewrite that task.
• A worker done claim must be independently verified before it becomes checkbox completion.
• On any non-confirmed verdict, append the feedback to the ledger, reset the checkbox work to in-progress, and re-dispatch the executor with the exact failure.
• The verifier must probe the applicable adversarial keys, including stale_state, dirty_worktree, and misleading_success_output, before allowing FullyDone.

Phase 5: Mark progress

Only after verification passes:

1. Edit the plan checkbox from - [ ] to - [x].
2. Re-read the plan and confirm the remaining count decreased.
3. Append a task-completed ledger entry.
4. Continue with the next checkbox. Do not ask whether to continue.

Completion

When all top-level checkboxes in ## TODOs and ## Final Verification Wave are complete:

1. Run the plan's final verification commands.
2. For PR/branch work, finish the lifecycle from the task-owned worktree: sync .omo/ state back to the main repo, create or update the PR, wait for review/verification gates, merge by default unless explicitly opted out, and remove the worktree only after successful merge or explicit handoff.
3. Remove or mark the Boulder work as completed.
4. Print an ORCHESTRATION COMPLETE block with the plan path, verification commands, artifacts, and cleanup receipts.

Hard rules

• No production change before a failing-first proof exists (unit test at a seam, otherwise the failing Manual-QA scenario), and no change to existing behavior before a baseline characterization test pins the current behavior and passes on the unchanged code.
• No --dry-run as completion evidence.
• No tests-only completion claim. A Manual-QA artifact is required.
• NO DIRECT IMPLEMENTATION BY THE ORCHESTRATOR. Root NEVER edits product files, writes tests, or runs QA itself — a spawned worker does.
• No completion claim while an applicable ultraqa adversarial class was never probed. Each applicable class needs a captured observable result; each skipped class needs a one-line not-applicable reason in the ledger.
• No PR/branch implementation, review, or merge in the main worktree; use the task-owned git worktree.
• No unprefixed session ids in Boulder state. Codex sessions are always codex:<session_id>.
• No stale-memory execution. The plan and ledger are the durable source of truth.

Source: code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent → packages/shared-skills/skills/start-work/SKILL.md