Executing Red Team Engagement Planning
Overview
Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins. A well-structured engagement plan ensures the red team simulates realistic adversary behavior while maintaining safety guardrails that prevent unintended business disruption.
When to Use
- When conducting security assessments that involve executing red team engagement planning
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
Prerequisites
- Familiarity with red teaming concepts and tools
- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
Objectives
- Define clear engagement scope including in-scope and out-of-scope assets, networks, and personnel
- Establish Rules of Engagement (ROE) with emergency stop procedures, communication channels, and legal boundaries
- Select appropriate threat profiles from the MITRE ATT&CK framework aligned to the organization's threat landscape
- Create a detailed attack plan mapping adversary TTPs to engagement objectives
- Develop deconfliction procedures with the organization's SOC/blue team
- Produce a comprehensive engagement brief for stakeholder approval
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
Core Concepts
Engagement Types
| Type |
Description |
Scope |
| Full Scope |
Complete adversary simulation with physical, social, and cyber vectors |
Entire organization |
| Assumed Breach |
Starts from initial foothold, focuses on post-exploitation |
Internal network |
| Objective-Based |
Target specific crown jewels (e.g., domain admin, PII exfiltration) |
Defined targets |
| Purple Team |
Collaborative with blue team for detection improvement |
Specific controls |
Rules of Engagement Components
- Scope Definition: IP ranges, domains, physical locations, personnel
- Restrictions: Systems/networks that must not be touched (e.g., production databases, medical devices)
- Communication Plan: Primary and secondary contact channels, escalation procedures
- Emergency Procedures: Code word for immediate cessation, incident response coordination
- Legal Authorization: Signed authorization letters, get-out-of-jail letters for physical tests
- Data Handling: How sensitive data discovered during testing will be handled and destroyed
- Timeline: Start/end dates, blackout windows, reporting deadlines
Threat Profile Selection
Map organizational threats using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to select relevant adversary profiles:
- APT29 (Cozy Bear): Government/defense sector targeting via spearphishing, supply chain
- APT28 (Fancy Bear): Government organizations, credential harvesting, zero-days
- FIN7: Financial sector, POS malware, social engineering
- Lazarus Group: Financial institutions, cryptocurrency exchanges, destructive malware
- Conti/Royal: Ransomware operators, double extortion, RaaS model
Workflow
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement
- Conduct initial scoping meeting with stakeholders
- Identify crown jewels and critical business assets
- Review previous security assessments and audit findings
- Define success criteria and engagement objectives
- Draft Rules of Engagement document
Phase 2: Threat Modeling
- Identify relevant threat actors using MITRE ATT&CK
- Map threat actor TTPs to organizational attack surface
- Select primary and secondary attack scenarios
- Define adversary emulation plan with specific technique IDs
- Establish detection checkpoints for purple team opportunities
Phase 3: Operational Planning
- Set up secure communication channels (encrypted email, Signal, etc.)
- Create operational security (OPSEC) guidelines for the red team
- Establish infrastructure requirements (C2 servers, redirectors, phishing domains)
- Develop phased attack timeline with go/no-go decision points
- Create deconfliction matrix with SOC/IR team
Phase 4: Documentation and Approval
- Compile engagement plan document
- Review with legal counsel
- Obtain executive sponsor signature
- Brief red team operators on ROE and restrictions
- Distribute emergency contact cards
Tools and Resources
- MITRE ATT&CK Navigator: Threat actor TTP mapping and visualization
- VECTR: Red team engagement tracking and metrics platform
- Cobalt Strike / Nighthawk: C2 framework planning and infrastructure design
- PlexTrac: Red team reporting and engagement management platform
- SCYTHE: Adversary emulation platform for attack plan creation
Validation Criteria
Common Pitfalls
- Scope Creep: Expanding testing beyond approved boundaries during execution
- Inadequate Deconfliction: SOC investigating red team activity as real incidents
- Missing Legal Authorization: Testing without proper signed authorization
- Unrealistic Threat Models: Simulating threats irrelevant to the organization
- Poor Communication: Failing to maintain contact with stakeholders during engagement
Related Skills
- performing-open-source-intelligence-gathering
- conducting-adversary-simulation-with-atomic-red-team
- performing-assumed-breach-red-team-exercise
- building-red-team-infrastructure-with-redirectors
1---
2name: executing-red-team-engagement-planning
3description: Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE),
4 threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins.
5domain: cybersecurity
6subdomain: red-teaming
7tags:
8- red-team
9- adversary-simulation
10- mitre-attack
11- exploitation
12- post-exploitation
13- engagement-planning
14- rules-of-engagement
15version: '1.0'
16author: mahipal
17license: Apache-2.0
18nist_csf:
19- ID.RA-01
20- GV.OV-02
21- DE.AE-07
22---
23
24# Executing Red Team Engagement Planning
25
26## Overview
27
28Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins. A well-structured engagement plan ensures the red team simulates realistic adversary behavior while maintaining safety guardrails that prevent unintended business disruption.
29
30
31## When to Use
32
33- When conducting security assessments that involve executing red team engagement planning
34- When following incident response procedures for related security events
35- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
36- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
37
38## Prerequisites
39
40- Familiarity with red teaming concepts and tools
41- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
42- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
43- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
44
45## Objectives
46
47- Define clear engagement scope including in-scope and out-of-scope assets, networks, and personnel
48- Establish Rules of Engagement (ROE) with emergency stop procedures, communication channels, and legal boundaries
49- Select appropriate threat profiles from the MITRE ATT&CK framework aligned to the organization's threat landscape
50- Create a detailed attack plan mapping adversary TTPs to engagement objectives
51- Develop deconfliction procedures with the organization's SOC/blue team
52- Produce a comprehensive engagement brief for stakeholder approval
53
54> **Legal Notice:** This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
55
56## Core Concepts
57
58### Engagement Types
59
60| Type | Description | Scope |
61|------|-------------|-------|
62| Full Scope | Complete adversary simulation with physical, social, and cyber vectors | Entire organization |
63| Assumed Breach | Starts from initial foothold, focuses on post-exploitation | Internal network |
64| Objective-Based | Target specific crown jewels (e.g., domain admin, PII exfiltration) | Defined targets |
65| Purple Team | Collaborative with blue team for detection improvement | Specific controls |
66
67### Rules of Engagement Components
68
691. **Scope Definition**: IP ranges, domains, physical locations, personnel
702. **Restrictions**: Systems/networks that must not be touched (e.g., production databases, medical devices)
713. **Communication Plan**: Primary and secondary contact channels, escalation procedures
724. **Emergency Procedures**: Code word for immediate cessation, incident response coordination
735. **Legal Authorization**: Signed authorization letters, get-out-of-jail letters for physical tests
746. **Data Handling**: How sensitive data discovered during testing will be handled and destroyed
757. **Timeline**: Start/end dates, blackout windows, reporting deadlines
76
77### Threat Profile Selection
78
79Map organizational threats using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to select relevant adversary profiles:
80
81- **APT29 (Cozy Bear)**: Government/defense sector targeting via spearphishing, supply chain
82- **APT28 (Fancy Bear)**: Government organizations, credential harvesting, zero-days
83- **FIN7**: Financial sector, POS malware, social engineering
84- **Lazarus Group**: Financial institutions, cryptocurrency exchanges, destructive malware
85- **Conti/Royal**: Ransomware operators, double extortion, RaaS model
86
87## Workflow
88
89### Phase 1: Pre-Engagement
90
911. Conduct initial scoping meeting with stakeholders
922. Identify crown jewels and critical business assets
933. Review previous security assessments and audit findings
944. Define success criteria and engagement objectives
955. Draft Rules of Engagement document
96
97### Phase 2: Threat Modeling
98
991. Identify relevant threat actors using MITRE ATT&CK
1002. Map threat actor TTPs to organizational attack surface
1013. Select primary and secondary attack scenarios
1024. Define adversary emulation plan with specific technique IDs
1035. Establish detection checkpoints for purple team opportunities
104
105### Phase 3: Operational Planning
106
1071. Set up secure communication channels (encrypted email, Signal, etc.)
1082. Create operational security (OPSEC) guidelines for the red team
1093. Establish infrastructure requirements (C2 servers, redirectors, phishing domains)
1104. Develop phased attack timeline with go/no-go decision points
1115. Create deconfliction matrix with SOC/IR team
112
113### Phase 4: Documentation and Approval
114
1151. Compile engagement plan document
1162. Review with legal counsel
1173. Obtain executive sponsor signature
1184. Brief red team operators on ROE and restrictions
1195. Distribute emergency contact cards
120
121## Tools and Resources
122
123- **MITRE ATT&CK Navigator**: Threat actor TTP mapping and visualization
124- **VECTR**: Red team engagement tracking and metrics platform
125- **Cobalt Strike / Nighthawk**: C2 framework planning and infrastructure design
126- **PlexTrac**: Red team reporting and engagement management platform
127- **SCYTHE**: Adversary emulation platform for attack plan creation
128
129## Validation Criteria
130
131- [ ] Signed Rules of Engagement document
132- [ ] Defined scope with explicit in/out boundaries
133- [ ] Selected threat profile with mapped MITRE ATT&CK techniques
134- [ ] Emergency stop procedures tested and verified
135- [ ] Communication plan distributed to all stakeholders
136- [ ] Legal authorization obtained and filed
137- [ ] Red team operators briefed and acknowledged ROE
138
139## Common Pitfalls
140
1411. **Scope Creep**: Expanding testing beyond approved boundaries during execution
1422. **Inadequate Deconfliction**: SOC investigating red team activity as real incidents
1433. **Missing Legal Authorization**: Testing without proper signed authorization
1444. **Unrealistic Threat Models**: Simulating threats irrelevant to the organization
1455. **Poor Communication**: Failing to maintain contact with stakeholders during engagement
146
147## Related Skills
148
149- performing-open-source-intelligence-gathering
150- conducting-adversary-simulation-with-atomic-red-team
151- performing-assumed-breach-red-team-exercise
152- building-red-team-infrastructure-with-redirectors