Verification Methodology
Pass/fail assessment against pre-defined criteria.
The Verification Protocol
- Receive — restate the artifact, claim, or implementation being verified and the decision it will support.
- Assess criteria — convert requirements into observable pass/fail conditions; identify what would disprove each claim.
- Investigate — collect direct, reproducible evidence from the source named by the request and record commands, source locations, or source URLs. Own this collection when the source is accessible: do not ask the user to relay evidence you can retrieve yourself. Ask only for access you genuinely lack.
- Decide — mark each criterion passed, failed, blocked, or not applicable. Do not convert missing evidence into a pass.
- Report — use the verdict template to distinguish verified facts, assumptions, and remaining work.
Stop when every criterion has direct evidence or an explicit blocked/not-applicable verdict. Escalate when the criterion is ambiguous, evidence conflicts, or the required access is unavailable.
Source Fidelity
Treat the requested or configured local service as part of the verification criterion, not as an interchangeable topic label.
- Load the matching skill and use its documented executable or service path before adjacent integrations, generic web search, or public project sources.
- Use the path resolved by the skill itself. A missing global
PATH entry does not prove that a bundled executable is unavailable.
- If the direct source fails, report the attempted command or endpoint and its exact failure. Do not silently substitute evidence from another source.
- Use a substitute only when the user requests broader context or explicitly accepts the fallback. Label substitute evidence as secondary and do not present it as the requested source's state.
Example: for “What’s new on Jellyfin?” in an environment with a configured Jellyfin skill and bundled CLI, query that server through the bundled CLI first. Home Assistant entities and public Jellyfin project activity answer different questions.
When not to use
Do not use this skill for open-ended exploration that has no artifact, claim, decision, or observable completion criterion. Use a research or discovery skill first, then return here when there is something falsifiable to verify.
Reference Files
| Reference |
When to load |
references/criteria-assessment.md |
You need to evaluate whether work meets completion criteria |
references/evidence-standards.md |
You need to judge whether evidence supports the claims made |
references/magnus919-refine-to-ship-gate.md |
You are running the Magnus919 Refine-to-Ship verifier gate — 12 criteria, editorial change verification, output structure |
references/verdict-template.md |
You need to produce a structured pass/fail/hold verdict |
Magnus919 Refine-to-Ship Gate Criteria
12 criteria for the verifier profile. Each criterion maps to an observable, reproducible check.
All 12 Criteria
| # |
Criterion |
How to Verify |
| 1 |
Dash scan — zero em dash (U+2014), en dash (U+2013), horizontal bar (U+2015), or visible prose double-hyphen |
search_files for [\u2014\u2013\u2015] and \-\-. Double-hyphens in YAML frontmatter delimiters are OK. |
| 2 |
Fact-check — all methodology claims map to source; no fabricated numbers, chronology, or universal claims |
Cross-reference article claims to source document sections. Search for \d+%, percent, average of, illustrative. Search for research proves, studies demonstrate. |
| 3 |
Voice-check — Magnus fingerprint: conversational first-person, contractions, "But" pivots (not formal transitions), colons over semicolons, no consultant cadence |
Search for Furthermore, Moreover, Nevertheless, Consequently, Therefore, not only.*but also, triplet parallelism. Count colons vs semicolons (should skew heavily toward colons). |
| 4 |
Oxford commas, spelling, grammar — American English, Oxford commas in series, no spelling errors |
Manual read of series. Check for consistent formatting. |
| 5 |
No formulaic AI closing — zero "In conclusion", "To summarize", "In this article", generic motivational advice |
search_files for In conclusion, Ultimately,, To summarize, In this article, In this post. |
| 6 |
Methodology-first — personal frame ≤ ~10% of article; rest is methodology |
Count paragraphs in frame vs body. |
| 7 |
Human stake integrated — cognitive burden, expertise formation, transferred work, anti-surveillance, accountable authority |
Verify dedicated section or dispersed coverage of all dimensions. |
| 8 |
Privacy/anonymization — zero company identifiers, role titles, named people, source filename, proprietary domain examples |
search_files for company name, product names, domain-specific terminology from source. |
| 9 |
Frontmatter — title, slug, date, byline correct and value-identical to specification |
read_file lines 1–11. |
| 10 |
Links resolve — each distinct URL appears once at first meaningful mention; all return 200 |
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" each URL. Verify link text is at first meaningful mention. |
| 11 |
Hugo build + routes — build exit 0; new route returns 200; old take-home-title route returns 404 |
hugo --quiet && echo EXIT:$?. curl both routes. |
| 12 |
No duplicate source bundle — single directory, single index.md; no stale *take-home* directories |
ls the page bundle directory. find in content/posts for duplicate slug patterns. |
Parent-Requested Editorial Changes
When the parent profile specifies editorial changes during gate recovery, verify each one is present before proceeding with the full criteria scan:
| Change Type |
Verification Method |
| Fabricated illustrative numbers removed |
search_files for \d+%, percent, PRs? per, average of → zero hits |
| Tense correction |
search_files for the exact parent-specified phrase |
| Closing replacement |
search_files for the first and last sentence of the parent-specified closing |
Verdict Rules
- PASS: All 12 criteria met. Produce 00-index.md, 01-summary/verdict.md, 02-analysis/per-criteria-results.md.
- BLOCK: Any criterion fails. Produce gap-details.md with specific fix instructions. See
verifier-gate-recovery skill for remediation patterns.
Output Structure
/private/tmp/verifier-gate/<slug>-refine/
00-index.md — verdict, links to artifacts
01-summary/verdict.md — per-criterion pass/fail table
02-analysis/
per-criteria-results.md — detailed evidence per criterion
gap-details.md — only if BLOCK, with remediation instructions
Portability
This skill is intentionally host-neutral. Use your agent's normal mechanisms to load the references, templates, and scripts listed here. Do not assume a particular profile system, task orchestrator, memory service, or response-handoff format.
1---2name: verification-methodology3description: Verify work against explicit criteria using direct, source-faithful evidence, reproducible checks, and clear verdicts. Use before declaring an artifact, implementation, or claim complete; do not use for exploratory research without pass/fail criteria.4license: MIT5---6
7
8# Verification Methodology
9
10Pass/fail assessment against pre-defined criteria.
11
12## The Verification Protocol
13
141. **Receive** — restate the artifact, claim, or implementation being verified and the decision it will support.
152. **Assess criteria** — convert requirements into observable pass/fail conditions; identify what would disprove each claim.
163. **Investigate** — collect direct, reproducible evidence from the source named by the request and record commands, source locations, or source URLs. Own this collection when the source is accessible: do not ask the user to relay evidence you can retrieve yourself. Ask only for access you genuinely lack.
174. **Decide** — mark each criterion passed, failed, blocked, or not applicable. Do not convert missing evidence into a pass.
185. **Report** — use the verdict template to distinguish verified facts, assumptions, and remaining work.
19
20Stop when every criterion has direct evidence or an explicit blocked/not-applicable verdict. Escalate when the criterion is ambiguous, evidence conflicts, or the required access is unavailable.
21
22## Source Fidelity
23
24Treat the requested or configured local service as part of the verification criterion, not as an interchangeable topic label.
25
261. Load the matching skill and use its documented executable or service path before adjacent integrations, generic web search, or public project sources.
272. Use the path resolved by the skill itself. A missing global `PATH` entry does not prove that a bundled executable is unavailable.
283. If the direct source fails, report the attempted command or endpoint and its exact failure. Do not silently substitute evidence from another source.
294. Use a substitute only when the user requests broader context or explicitly accepts the fallback. Label substitute evidence as secondary and do not present it as the requested source's state.
30
31Example: for “What’s new on Jellyfin?” in an environment with a configured Jellyfin skill and bundled CLI, query that server through the bundled CLI first. Home Assistant entities and public Jellyfin project activity answer different questions.
32
33## When not to use
34
35Do not use this skill for open-ended exploration that has no artifact, claim, decision, or observable completion criterion. Use a research or discovery skill first, then return here when there is something falsifiable to verify.
36
37## Reference Files
38
39| Reference | When to load |
40|-----------|-------------|
41| `references/criteria-assessment.md` | You need to evaluate whether work meets completion criteria |
42| `references/evidence-standards.md` | You need to judge whether evidence supports the claims made |
43| `references/magnus919-refine-to-ship-gate.md` | You are running the Magnus919 Refine-to-Ship verifier gate — 12 criteria, editorial change verification, output structure |
44| `references/verdict-template.md` | You need to produce a structured pass/fail/hold verdict |
45
46## Magnus919 Refine-to-Ship Gate Criteria
47
4812 criteria for the verifier profile. Each criterion maps to an observable, reproducible check.
49
50### All 12 Criteria
51
52| # | Criterion | How to Verify |
53|---|-----------|---------------|
54| 1 | **Dash scan** — zero em dash (U+2014), en dash (U+2013), horizontal bar (U+2015), or visible prose double-hyphen | `search_files` for `[\u2014\u2013\u2015]` and `\-\-`. Double-hyphens in YAML frontmatter delimiters are OK. |
55| 2 | **Fact-check** — all methodology claims map to source; no fabricated numbers, chronology, or universal claims | Cross-reference article claims to source document sections. Search for `\d+%`, `percent`, `average of`, `illustrative`. Search for `research proves`, `studies demonstrate`. |
56| 3 | **Voice-check** — Magnus fingerprint: conversational first-person, contractions, "But" pivots (not formal transitions), colons over semicolons, no consultant cadence | Search for `Furthermore`, `Moreover`, `Nevertheless`, `Consequently`, `Therefore`, `not only.*but also`, triplet parallelism. Count colons vs semicolons (should skew heavily toward colons). |
57| 4 | **Oxford commas, spelling, grammar** — American English, Oxford commas in series, no spelling errors | Manual read of series. Check for consistent formatting. |
58| 5 | **No formulaic AI closing** — zero "In conclusion", "To summarize", "In this article", generic motivational advice | `search_files` for `In conclusion`, `Ultimately,`, `To summarize`, `In this article`, `In this post`. |
59| 6 | **Methodology-first** — personal frame ≤ ~10% of article; rest is methodology | Count paragraphs in frame vs body. |
60| 7 | **Human stake integrated** — cognitive burden, expertise formation, transferred work, anti-surveillance, accountable authority | Verify dedicated section or dispersed coverage of all dimensions. |
61| 8 | **Privacy/anonymization** — zero company identifiers, role titles, named people, source filename, proprietary domain examples | `search_files` for company name, product names, domain-specific terminology from source. |
62| 9 | **Frontmatter** — title, slug, date, byline correct and value-identical to specification | `read_file` lines 1–11. |
63| 10 | **Links resolve** — each distinct URL appears once at first meaningful mention; all return 200 | `curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}"` each URL. Verify link text is at first meaningful mention. |
64| 11 | **Hugo build + routes** — build exit 0; new route returns 200; old take-home-title route returns 404 | `hugo --quiet && echo EXIT:$?`. `curl` both routes. |
65| 12 | **No duplicate source bundle** — single directory, single `index.md`; no stale `*take-home*` directories | `ls` the page bundle directory. `find` in content/posts for duplicate slug patterns. |
66
67### Parent-Requested Editorial Changes
68
69When the parent profile specifies editorial changes during gate recovery, verify each one is present before proceeding with the full criteria scan:
70
71| Change Type | Verification Method |
72|-------------|-------------------|
73| Fabricated illustrative numbers removed | `search_files` for `\d+%`, `percent`, `PRs? per`, `average of` → zero hits |
74| Tense correction | `search_files` for the exact parent-specified phrase |
75| Closing replacement | `search_files` for the first and last sentence of the parent-specified closing |
76
77### Verdict Rules
78
79- **PASS:** All 12 criteria met. Produce 00-index.md, 01-summary/verdict.md, 02-analysis/per-criteria-results.md.
80- **BLOCK:** Any criterion fails. Produce gap-details.md with specific fix instructions. See `verifier-gate-recovery` skill for remediation patterns.
81
82### Output Structure
83
84```
85/private/tmp/verifier-gate/<slug>-refine/
86 00-index.md — verdict, links to artifacts
87 01-summary/verdict.md — per-criterion pass/fail table
88 02-analysis/
89 per-criteria-results.md — detailed evidence per criterion
90 gap-details.md — only if BLOCK, with remediation instructions
91```
92
93## Portability
94
95This skill is intentionally host-neutral. Use your agent's normal mechanisms to load the references, templates, and scripts listed here. Do not assume a particular profile system, task orchestrator, memory service, or response-handoff format.
theheavenlyd3mon