How do I install the Linguist skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add theonize/linguist in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Linguist safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Linguist?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Linguist free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Linguist?

theonize (@theonize) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Linguist by theonize — Agent Skill

Name: Linguist
Author: theonize

Linguist

Analyze Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic linguistic features in Bible passages. Use when doing word studies, exploring etymology, examining grammar and syntax, comparing translations, or investigating textual variants and manuscript evidence.

theonize e19f1c9 2.4 KB Updated Sep 17, 2026

File contents

Linguist Skill

Pi port: This project-local Pi skill is based on .claude/skills/linguist/SKILL.md, but runs from .pi/skills/linguist/SKILL.md. When using it in Pi, read this .pi file and do not edit or depend on the .claude skill.

Research and determine the context of a Biblical passage by answering the following questions:

What was the original language of this writing?
What are the lexical semantics and range of the passage?
What are some notable morphological and grammatical features of the passage?
What are the lexical-syntactical and discourse features of the passage?
What is the etymology of key terms?
What are some notable translation decisions associated with this passage?
What notable textual variants are there? Do they change the teaching?

Output Format

Produce content under the heading ## Linguistic Analysis.

Organize answers as ### subsections:

1. Original Language

Language classification, period, distinctive features of this text's language.

2. Lexical Semantics

3. Morphological and Grammatical Features

Verb forms, construct chains, notable syntax, parsing of significant words.

4. Discourse Structure

Progression markers, rhetorical flow, discourse-level features.

5. Etymology of Key Terms

Word origins, development across biblical usage, cognates.

6. Translation Decisions

Compare major versions. Use a translation comparison table: | Version | Rendering | Notes |

7. Textual Variants

Manuscript evidence, critical apparatus notes, impact on interpretation — state explicitly whether any variant changes the teaching.

Formatting

Hebrew/Greek: term (Hebrew: script, transliteration)
Strong's numbers: H1234 / G5678
Vocabulary tables for key terms with semantic ranges
Morphological notation where relevant
Translation comparison tables across major versions (e.g. ESV, NASB, NIV, KJV, WEB — pick what best illustrates the decision)

---name: linguistdescription: Analyze Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic linguistic features in Bible passages. Use when doing word studies, exploring etymology, examining grammar and syntax, comparing translations, or investigating textual variants and manuscript evidence.---# Linguist Skill> **Pi port:** This project-local Pi skill is based on `.claude/skills/linguist/SKILL.md`, but runs from `.pi/skills/linguist/SKILL.md`. When using it in Pi, read this `.pi` file and do not edit or depend on the `.claude` skill.Research and determine the context of a Biblical passage by answering the following questions:* What was the original language of this writing?* What are the lexical semantics and range of the passage?* What are some notable morphological and grammatical features of the passage?* What are the lexical-syntactical and discourse features of the passage?* What is the etymology of key terms?* What are some notable translation decisions associated with this passage?* What notable textual variants are there? Do they change the teaching?## Output FormatProduce content under the heading `## Linguistic Analysis`.Organize answers as `### ` subsections:### 1. Original LanguageLanguage classification, period, distinctive features of this text's language.### 2. Lexical SemanticsKey terms with Strong's numbers, roots, semantic ranges, and intertextual connections. Use vocabulary tables:| Term | Strong's | Root | Meaning | Occurrences | Key Usage |### 3. Morphological and Grammatical FeaturesVerb forms, construct chains, notable syntax, parsing of significant words.### 4. Discourse StructureProgression markers, rhetorical flow, discourse-level features.### 5. Etymology of Key TermsWord origins, development across biblical usage, cognates.### 6. Translation DecisionsCompare major versions. Use a translation comparison table:| Version | Rendering | Notes |### 7. Textual VariantsManuscript evidence, critical apparatus notes, impact on interpretation — state explicitly whether any variant changes the teaching.### Formatting- Hebrew/Greek: **term** (Hebrew: script, *transliteration*)- Strong's numbers: H1234 / G5678- Vocabulary tables for key terms with semantic ranges- Morphological notation where relevant- Translation comparison tables across major versions (e.g. ESV, NASB, NIV, KJV, WEB — pick what best illustrates the decision)

Frequently asked questions