Contract Analysis
Extracts and evaluates material provisions, risk allocations, and obligations across one or more contracts to support negotiation, execution, or remediation decisions.
Prerequisites
Before starting, collect:
- Contract document(s) — executed or draft; note which
- Client role — which party the analysis favors (or neutral)
- Jurisdiction — governing law if known; flag if absent
- Scope — full review, specific provisions, or multi-contract comparison
Workflow
1. Executive Summary
- Parties, effective date, term, governing law (1–2 sentences each)
- Top 3–5 critical risks requiring immediate attention
- Overall favorability: favorable / balanced / unfavorable
2. Key Provisions Matrix
For each provision, record section number, summary, risk level (High/Med/Low), and notes.
Provisions to evaluate:
- Term & Termination — cure periods, notice, convenience rights
- Payment Terms — timing, late fees, set-off rights
- Scope / Deliverables — ambiguity, change-order mechanics
- Indemnification — mutual vs. one-sided, carve-outs
- Limitation of Liability — cap amount, excluded damages
- Warranty / Disclaimer — express vs. implied, remedy limits
- Insurance — required types, minimums
- IP Ownership — work-for-hire, license-back, background IP
- Confidentiality — term, carve-outs, residuals clause
- Dispute Resolution — arb vs. litigation, venue, fee-shifting
- Auto-Renewal — notice window, opt-out mechanics
- Assignment / Change of Control — consent requirements
- Force Majeure — scope, notice, extended FM termination right
- Governing Law / Venue
3. Risk Matrix
For each issue found, record section, severity, likelihood, and recommended action.
Risk categories:
- Ambiguity — language supporting multiple interpretations
- Asymmetry — one-sided obligations or liability allocation
- Gaps — material matters left unaddressed
- Conflicts — internal inconsistencies between sections
- Unenforceability — provisions likely void under applicable law
4. Comparative Analysis (multi-contract only)
Table comparing key terms across agreements; flag deviations from market standard.
5. Prioritized Recommendations
Rank issues by priority (Critical → High → Moderate) with provision reference, issue description, and proposed fix for each.
Checks
- Cite exact section numbers and quote key language verbatim
- Flag auto-renewal clauses with short opt-out windows as high-priority regardless of other factors
- Note all cross-references to external documents, exhibits, or incorporated standards — treat as additional obligations
- For ambiguous provisions, state the full range of plausible interpretations and implications
- Mark
[VERIFY] on any statutory or case citations — do not assess enforceability under specific state law without verifying current precedent
- UCC Article 2 applies to goods; common law governs services — note if contract mixes both without specifying
- Flag non-compete, non-solicit, and liquidated damages clauses for separate enforceability review under applicable state law
1---2name: contract-analysis3description: Analyzes contracts to identify key terms, obligations, risks, and negotiation opportunities. Produces structured risk assessments with executive summary, provision review, risk matrix, and prioritized recommendations. Use when reviewing agreements before execution, during negotiation, at closing, or for compliance monitoring.4license: Apache-2.05---67# Contract Analysis89Extracts and evaluates material provisions, risk allocations, and obligations across one or more contracts to support negotiation, execution, or remediation decisions.1011## Prerequisites1213Before starting, collect:14151. **Contract document(s)** — executed or draft; note which162. **Client role** — which party the analysis favors (or neutral)173. **Jurisdiction** — governing law if known; flag if absent184. **Scope** — full review, specific provisions, or multi-contract comparison1920## Workflow2122### 1. Executive Summary2324- Parties, effective date, term, governing law (1–2 sentences each)25- Top 3–5 critical risks requiring immediate attention26- Overall favorability: favorable / balanced / unfavorable2728### 2. Key Provisions Matrix2930For each provision, record section number, summary, risk level (High/Med/Low), and notes.3132Provisions to evaluate:33- **Term & Termination** — cure periods, notice, convenience rights34- **Payment Terms** — timing, late fees, set-off rights35- **Scope / Deliverables** — ambiguity, change-order mechanics36- **Indemnification** — mutual vs. one-sided, carve-outs37- **Limitation of Liability** — cap amount, excluded damages38- **Warranty / Disclaimer** — express vs. implied, remedy limits39- **Insurance** — required types, minimums40- **IP Ownership** — work-for-hire, license-back, background IP41- **Confidentiality** — term, carve-outs, residuals clause42- **Dispute Resolution** — arb vs. litigation, venue, fee-shifting43- **Auto-Renewal** — notice window, opt-out mechanics44- **Assignment / Change of Control** — consent requirements45- **Force Majeure** — scope, notice, extended FM termination right46- **Governing Law / Venue**4748### 3. Risk Matrix4950For each issue found, record section, severity, likelihood, and recommended action.5152Risk categories:53- **Ambiguity** — language supporting multiple interpretations54- **Asymmetry** — one-sided obligations or liability allocation55- **Gaps** — material matters left unaddressed56- **Conflicts** — internal inconsistencies between sections57- **Unenforceability** — provisions likely void under applicable law5859### 4. Comparative Analysis *(multi-contract only)*6061Table comparing key terms across agreements; flag deviations from market standard.6263### 5. Prioritized Recommendations6465Rank issues by priority (Critical → High → Moderate) with provision reference, issue description, and proposed fix for each.6667## Checks6869- Cite exact section numbers and quote key language verbatim70- Flag auto-renewal clauses with short opt-out windows as high-priority regardless of other factors71- Note all cross-references to external documents, exhibits, or incorporated standards — treat as additional obligations72- For ambiguous provisions, state the full range of plausible interpretations and implications73- Mark `[VERIFY]` on any statutory or case citations — do not assess enforceability under specific state law without verifying current precedent74- UCC Article 2 applies to goods; common law governs services — note if contract mixes both without specifying75- Flag non-compete, non-solicit, and liquidated damages clauses for separate enforceability review under applicable state law