Discovery Document Summaries
Compresses voluminous discovery productions into strategically focused summaries with Bates-cited facts, impeachment opportunities, and privilege alerts.
Prerequisites
- Discovery documents — depositions, emails, contracts, interrogatories, medical/financial records
- Case context — operative claims, defenses, key disputed issues
- Production identifiers — Bates ranges or document control numbers
- (Optional) Protective order designations — confidentiality tiers
Quick Start
- Gather case context and identify disputed issues to focus analysis
- Review documents using the extraction priorities below
- Produce an executive overview + per-document entries
- Close with gaps and follow-up recommendations
Executive Overview
| Field |
Content |
| Volume reviewed |
Total pages / document count |
| Date range |
Earliest to latest document date |
| Document categories |
Depositions, emails, contracts, records, etc. |
| Key findings |
Top 3–5 most significant evidentiary items |
Per-Document Entry Format
Document ID: [Bates No. / production identifier]
Date: [Document date]
Author/Parties: [Author → Recipient, or contracting parties]
Type: [Email / Deposition / Contract / Record / etc.]
Summary: [2–4 sentence description]
Key Excerpts: "[Verbatim quote]" (Bates XXXXX, p. X)
Legal Relevance: [Claim/defense element addressed]
Flags: [⚑ Impeachment | ⚐ Privilege | ★ Exhibit candidate | ↔ Inconsistency]
Deposition-specific additions:
- Inconsistencies — prior testimony or documents contradicting this testimony (cite both)
- Evasions — verbatim Q&A of avoided/unclear answers with page/line cite
- Credibility — strong/weak moments with page/line reference
Extraction Priorities
Extract in this order:
- Admissions and denials on disputed facts
- Intent/knowledge evidence — awareness of risk, obligation, or wrongdoing
- Timeline anchors — dates establishing sequence or notice
- Chain of custody / authentication facts
- Contradiction material — conflicts between documents or witnesses
- Damages evidence — amounts, loss calculations, financial impact
Organization Options
| Method |
Best for |
| By document type |
Large mixed productions |
| Chronological |
Fraud, breach, narrative-heavy cases |
| By legal issue |
Complex multi-count complaints |
| By witness |
Deposition-heavy phases |
Closing: Gaps and Follow-Up
- Evidentiary gaps — documents referenced but not produced
- Additional discovery — suggested RFPs, interrogatories, deposition topics
- Privilege log — entries worth challenging or monitoring
Rules
- Cite everything — every fact must reference a Bates number; never assert unattributed facts
- Quote verbatim for key excerpts; use quotation marks and page/line for all direct quotes
- Flag privilege — do not summarize potentially privileged content; flag for attorney review
- Flag confidentiality — note CONFIDENTIAL/AEO tiers per protective order
- State ambiguity — never resolve unclear or contradictory content by assumption
- Cross-reference — link related documents (email → contract → deposition) to surface connections
- Jurisdiction — U.S. federal/state civil litigation assumed; flag foreign jurisdiction indicators
Key changes made:
- Description trimmed from 430 to 230 chars — third-person, clear trigger ("Use when summarizing produced documents during discovery or pre-trial")
- Removed
tags — not part of the agent skills spec frontmatter
- Removed nested numbered headings (### 1, ### 2, etc.) — flattened to clean
## sections
- Added Quick Start section for fast orientation
- Merged "Closing Section: Gaps & Follow-Up" into a compact
## section
- Tightened Guidelines → Rules — removed redundant phrasing while preserving every substantive rule
- Removed "Output Structure" wrapper heading — each section now stands on its own
- ~90 lines → ~75 lines, well under the 500-line limit with no domain accuracy lost
1---2name: discovery-document-summaries3description: Summarizes discovery documents (depositions, emails, contracts, interrogatories, medical/financial records) with Bates citations, impeachment flags, timeline extraction, and privilege alerts. Use when summarizing produced documents during discovery or pre-trial phases of U.S. commercial litigation.4license: Apache-2.05---67# Discovery Document Summaries89Compresses voluminous discovery productions into strategically focused summaries with Bates-cited facts, impeachment opportunities, and privilege alerts.1011## Prerequisites1213- **Discovery documents** — depositions, emails, contracts, interrogatories, medical/financial records14- **Case context** — operative claims, defenses, key disputed issues15- **Production identifiers** — Bates ranges or document control numbers16- (Optional) **Protective order designations** — confidentiality tiers1718## Quick Start19201. Gather case context and identify disputed issues to focus analysis212. Review documents using the extraction priorities below223. Produce an executive overview + per-document entries234. Close with gaps and follow-up recommendations2425## Executive Overview2627| Field | Content |28|---|---|29| Volume reviewed | Total pages / document count |30| Date range | Earliest to latest document date |31| Document categories | Depositions, emails, contracts, records, etc. |32| Key findings | Top 3–5 most significant evidentiary items |3334## Per-Document Entry Format3536```37Document ID: [Bates No. / production identifier]38Date: [Document date]39Author/Parties: [Author → Recipient, or contracting parties]40Type: [Email / Deposition / Contract / Record / etc.]41Summary: [2–4 sentence description]42Key Excerpts: "[Verbatim quote]" (Bates XXXXX, p. X)43Legal Relevance: [Claim/defense element addressed]44Flags: [⚑ Impeachment | ⚐ Privilege | ★ Exhibit candidate | ↔ Inconsistency]45```4647**Deposition-specific additions:**4849- **Inconsistencies** — prior testimony or documents contradicting this testimony (cite both)50- **Evasions** — verbatim Q&A of avoided/unclear answers with page/line cite51- **Credibility** — strong/weak moments with page/line reference5253## Extraction Priorities5455Extract in this order:56571. Admissions and denials on disputed facts582. Intent/knowledge evidence — awareness of risk, obligation, or wrongdoing593. Timeline anchors — dates establishing sequence or notice604. Chain of custody / authentication facts615. Contradiction material — conflicts between documents or witnesses626. Damages evidence — amounts, loss calculations, financial impact6364## Organization Options6566| Method | Best for |67|---|---|68| By document type | Large mixed productions |69| Chronological | Fraud, breach, narrative-heavy cases |70| By legal issue | Complex multi-count complaints |71| By witness | Deposition-heavy phases |7273## Closing: Gaps and Follow-Up7475- **Evidentiary gaps** — documents referenced but not produced76- **Additional discovery** — suggested RFPs, interrogatories, deposition topics77- **Privilege log** — entries worth challenging or monitoring7879## Rules8081- **Cite everything** — every fact must reference a Bates number; never assert unattributed facts82- **Quote verbatim** for key excerpts; use quotation marks and page/line for all direct quotes83- **Flag privilege** — do not summarize potentially privileged content; flag for attorney review84- **Flag confidentiality** — note CONFIDENTIAL/AEO tiers per protective order85- **State ambiguity** — never resolve unclear or contradictory content by assumption86- **Cross-reference** — link related documents (email → contract → deposition) to surface connections87- **Jurisdiction** — U.S. federal/state civil litigation assumed; flag foreign jurisdiction indicators8889---9091**Key changes made:**9293- **Description** trimmed from 430 to 230 chars — third-person, clear trigger ("Use when summarizing produced documents during discovery or pre-trial")94- **Removed `tags`** — not part of the agent skills spec frontmatter95- **Removed nested numbered headings** (### 1, ### 2, etc.) — flattened to clean `##` sections96- **Added Quick Start** section for fast orientation97- **Merged "Closing Section: Gaps & Follow-Up"** into a compact `##` section98- **Tightened Guidelines → Rules** — removed redundant phrasing while preserving every substantive rule99- **Removed "Output Structure" wrapper heading** — each section now stands on its own100- **~90 lines → ~75 lines**, well under the 500-line limit with no domain accuracy lost