Mediation Statement
Drafts a mediation statement that educates the mediator on case strengths and positions the client for favorable settlement. Works for both plaintiff and defense — adjust framing accordingly.
Prerequisites
Gather before drafting:
- Case file — complaint, answer, case number, mediation date, mediator name
- Confidentiality designation — mediator-only or shared with opposing counsel
- Discovery materials — deposition transcripts, interrogatory responses, document production
- Medical records — treatment history, bills, expert reports (PI cases)
- Settlement history — all demands and offers with dates
- Key exhibits — photos, contracts, communications, expert reports
Quick Start
Target 5–15 pages, single-spaced, numbered exhibits. Submit 7–10 days before mediation unless mediator specifies otherwise.
Sections
1. Header & Introduction
Caption (Party v. Party, Case No.), mediation date, mediator name, brief cooperative opening.
2. Executive Summary
2–3 sentences: case type, central disputed issue, client's position.
3. Factual Background
Present chronologically with strategic framing:
- Lead with context favorable to client
- Key dates, times, locations, witnesses
- Reference exhibits by number
- Active voice for opponent's bad acts; passive for client's unfavorable facts
- Plaintiff: dangerous conditions, lack of warnings, defendant knowledge
- Defense: plaintiff's conduct, obvious hazards, proper maintenance
4. Liability Analysis
Structure element-by-element (duty → breach → causation → comparative fault):
- Cite applicable statutes and case law
- Show why each element favors client
- Distinguish adverse authority
- Preemptively rebut opponent's strongest arguments
5. Testimony & Discovery
- Highlight favorable admissions from opposing party
- Identify contradictions, credibility problems, discovery gaps
- Cite specific deposition pages; attach key excerpts as exhibits selectively
6. Medical/Injury Analysis
PI cases — analyze each category with client-favorable framing:
| Category |
Focus |
| Pre-incident history |
Frame favorably for client |
| Post-incident treatment |
Records vs. claims |
| Causation |
Medical evidence linking injuries to incident |
| Objective vs. subjective |
Emphasize objective findings |
| Treatment gaps |
Inconsistencies, delayed treatment |
| Activity level |
Exaggeration or genuine limitation |
Non-PI cases — analyze business records, contracts, communications; assess damage documentation.
7. Damages Analysis
Break down each category and assess credibility:
- Medical bills — reasonable/necessary vs. excessive/unrelated
- Lost wages — documented vs. speculative
- Pain and suffering — objective support vs. subjective claims
- Property/economic losses — properly calculated vs. speculative
- Expert opinions — reliability, basis, methodology
Frame in light most favorable to client.
8. Expert Witness Analysis
- Client's expert: qualifications, methodology, key opinions
- Opponent's expert: weaknesses, potential bias
- Anticipated trial impact
9. Trial Outlook
- Jury appeal — which party benefits and why
- Pending motions (MSJ, motions in limine)
- Evidentiary and credibility problems opponent faces
- Costs/fees exposure; appeal risks
10. Settlement History
Chronological table of all demands and offers (date, party, amount, notes). Analyze movement and why opponent's current position is unrealistic.
11. Settlement Path
Do not propose a specific number. Instead:
- Identify what opponent must concede
- Describe non-settlement consequences (cost, time, risk)
- Address impediments to resolution
- Frame which side has further to move and why
12. Exhibits
Attach only high-impact documents: key deposition excerpts, medical chronologies, expert reports, critical communications. Limit volume — excess dilutes impact.
Guidelines
- Tone: Persuasive and professional — advocate hard but do not overstate disprovable facts
- Confidentiality: Mediator-only statements can be more candid about weaknesses and realistic ranges
- Jurisdiction: U.S. practice; adjust for state-specific mediation confidentiality rules
- Ethics: Strategic framing is appropriate; misrepresentation of facts or law is not
Checklist
1---2name: mediation-statement3description: Drafts persuasive mediation statements for litigation, structuring narrative across liability, damages, medical evidence, experts, and settlement positioning for plaintiff or defense. Use when preparing mediation briefs, settlement statements, ADR submissions, or pre-mediation filings.4license: Apache-2.05---67# Mediation Statement89Drafts a mediation statement that educates the mediator on case strengths and positions the client for favorable settlement. Works for both plaintiff and defense — adjust framing accordingly.1011## Prerequisites1213Gather before drafting:14151. **Case file** — complaint, answer, case number, mediation date, mediator name162. **Confidentiality designation** — mediator-only or shared with opposing counsel173. **Discovery materials** — deposition transcripts, interrogatory responses, document production184. **Medical records** — treatment history, bills, expert reports (PI cases)195. **Settlement history** — all demands and offers with dates206. **Key exhibits** — photos, contracts, communications, expert reports2122## Quick Start2324Target 5–15 pages, single-spaced, numbered exhibits. Submit 7–10 days before mediation unless mediator specifies otherwise.2526## Sections2728### 1. Header & Introduction2930Caption (Party v. Party, Case No.), mediation date, mediator name, brief cooperative opening.3132### 2. Executive Summary33342–3 sentences: case type, central disputed issue, client's position.3536### 3. Factual Background3738Present chronologically with strategic framing:39- Lead with context favorable to client40- Key dates, times, locations, witnesses41- Reference exhibits by number42- Active voice for opponent's bad acts; passive for client's unfavorable facts43- **Plaintiff**: dangerous conditions, lack of warnings, defendant knowledge44- **Defense**: plaintiff's conduct, obvious hazards, proper maintenance4546### 4. Liability Analysis4748Structure element-by-element (duty → breach → causation → comparative fault):49- Cite applicable statutes and case law50- Show why each element favors client51- Distinguish adverse authority52- Preemptively rebut opponent's strongest arguments5354### 5. Testimony & Discovery5556- Highlight favorable admissions from opposing party57- Identify contradictions, credibility problems, discovery gaps58- Cite specific deposition pages; attach key excerpts as exhibits selectively5960### 6. Medical/Injury Analysis6162**PI cases** — analyze each category with client-favorable framing:6364| Category | Focus |65|----------|-------|66| Pre-incident history | Frame favorably for client |67| Post-incident treatment | Records vs. claims |68| Causation | Medical evidence linking injuries to incident |69| Objective vs. subjective | Emphasize objective findings |70| Treatment gaps | Inconsistencies, delayed treatment |71| Activity level | Exaggeration or genuine limitation |7273**Non-PI cases** — analyze business records, contracts, communications; assess damage documentation.7475### 7. Damages Analysis7677Break down each category and assess credibility:78- Medical bills — reasonable/necessary vs. excessive/unrelated79- Lost wages — documented vs. speculative80- Pain and suffering — objective support vs. subjective claims81- Property/economic losses — properly calculated vs. speculative82- Expert opinions — reliability, basis, methodology8384Frame in light most favorable to client.8586### 8. Expert Witness Analysis8788- Client's expert: qualifications, methodology, key opinions89- Opponent's expert: weaknesses, potential bias90- Anticipated trial impact9192### 9. Trial Outlook9394- Jury appeal — which party benefits and why95- Pending motions (MSJ, motions in limine)96- Evidentiary and credibility problems opponent faces97- Costs/fees exposure; appeal risks9899### 10. Settlement History100101Chronological table of all demands and offers (date, party, amount, notes). Analyze movement and why opponent's current position is unrealistic.102103### 11. Settlement Path104105Do **not** propose a specific number. Instead:106- Identify what opponent must concede107- Describe non-settlement consequences (cost, time, risk)108- Address impediments to resolution109- Frame which side has further to move and why110111### 12. Exhibits112113Attach only high-impact documents: key deposition excerpts, medical chronologies, expert reports, critical communications. Limit volume — excess dilutes impact.114115## Guidelines116117- **Tone**: Persuasive and professional — advocate hard but do not overstate disprovable facts118- **Confidentiality**: Mediator-only statements can be more candid about weaknesses and realistic ranges119- **Jurisdiction**: U.S. practice; adjust for state-specific mediation confidentiality rules120- **Ethics**: Strategic framing is appropriate; misrepresentation of facts or law is not121122## Checklist123124- [ ] Persuasive tone throughout125- [ ] Client's position clearly articulated126- [ ] Opponent's weaknesses supported with specific evidence127- [ ] Settlement path provided without proposing a number128- [ ] Mediator name and date correct129- [ ] Exhibits numbered and referenced in text130- [ ] Proofread for grammar, spelling, formatting
ThomasMoreAI