ThomasMoreAI Quality Checker
Use this skill at Step 9 against the Step 8 draft before citation audit and final delivery.
8-Item Checklist
- Every key conclusion has at least one Grade A or B
primary-authority source citation. A secondary source (law-firm memo, academic article, practitioner guide) does not satisfy this requirement regardless of its grade. - Legal hierarchy is not conflated.
- Amendment/effective dates and currency are checked.
- Jurisdiction level is accurate.
- Uncertain claims are clearly marked.
- All 6 mandatory output sections are present (scope & as-of date; conclusion summary; issue tree; detailed analysis; annotated bibliography; verification guide with pinpoints mapping each conclusion to a citation and URL/database target).
- No D-grade source is cited as a basis (sole or partial) for any conclusion.
- No source laundering: Every factual assertion or legal position attributed to a primary source in the narrative must trace to a directly fetched or verified primary-source text. If a claim was learned from a secondary source, it must either (a) be independently verified against the primary source and cite the primary source, or (b) be explicitly attributed to the secondary source with
[Secondary Commentary]marking.
Output Format
{
"quality_gate": "pass|fail",
"failed_items": [1, 4],
"remediation_plan": [
"Re-enter Step 3 for issue X",
"Patch section Y with new source Z"
]
}
Remediation Policy
- Round 1: collect additional sources for failing items.
- Round 2: patch only failing sections.
- If still failing: deliver with
[Unverified]tags.
Pre-flight Check (run at Step 7, before output generation)
Evaluate the analysis result against the five source-level items below. Items #3 and #6 from the full 8-item checklist (which require the formatted output to exist) are deferred to Step 9.
| Pre-flight # | Full checklist # | Check |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | #1 | Every key conclusion has at least one Grade A or B primary-authority source citation. Secondary sources (regardless of grade) do not satisfy this. |
| 2 | #2 | Legal hierarchy is not conflated — statute, regulation, guidance, and secondary sources are correctly distinguished. |
| 3 | #4 | Jurisdiction level is accurate — federal, state/province, EU-level, and member-state rules are not mixed. |
| 4 | #5 | No uncertain claim is stated as certain — all unconfirmed points use hedged language or [Unverified]. |
| 5 | #7 | No D-grade source is cited as a basis (sole or partial) for any conclusion. |
| 6 | #8 | No source laundering — every factual or legal claim presented as primary-source-backed is traceable to a directly fetched/verified primary text, not paraphrased from a secondary source. |
Pre-flight Output Format
{
"preflight": "pass|fail",
"failed_items": [1, 5],
"failing_issues": [
{
"issue_id": "KR-D1-I1",
"failed_item": 1,
"reason": "No primary source found for probability-disclosure requirement",
"retry_keywords": ["게임산업진흥에 관한 법률 시행령 확률형 아이템", "문화체육관광부 고시"]
}
]
}
If preflight is "pass", proceed immediately to Step 8.
If preflight is "fail", execute targeted Step 3 retry for failing_issues only, then re-run
the affected portions of Step 6 before re-running this pre-flight check.