Rails Audit Skill (thoughtbot Best Practices)
Perform comprehensive Ruby on Rails application audits based on thoughtbot's Ruby Science and Testing Rails best practices, with emphasis on Plain Old Ruby Objects (POROs) over Service Objects.
Audit Scope
The audit can be run in two modes:
- Full Application Audit: Analyze entire Rails application
- Targeted Audit: Analyze specific files or directories
Execution Flow
Step 1: Determine Audit Scope
Ask user or infer from request:
- Full audit: Analyze all of
app/, spec/ or test/, config/, db/, lib/
- Targeted audit: Analyze specified paths only
Step 2: Collect Optional Metrics (SimpleCov + RubyCritic)
Ask the user both questions upfront in a single AskUserQuestion so they can decide once:
- Question: "Before starting the audit, would you like to collect automated metrics?\n\n1. SimpleCov — runs your test suite to capture actual code coverage percentages\n2. RubyCritic — analyzes code complexity, duplication, and smells (does not run tests)\n\nBoth are recommended for the most thorough audit."
- Options: "Yes to both (Recommended)" / "SimpleCov only" / "RubyCritic only" / "Skip both"
Based on the user's choice, spawn the accepted subagents in parallel using the Task tool. Both can run at the same time because SimpleCov modifies the test helper while RubyCritic only reads source files — they don't conflict.
SimpleCov subagent (if accepted):
Read the file agents/simplecov_agent.md and follow all steps described in it. The audit scope is: {{SCOPE from Step 1}}. Return the coverage data in the output format specified in that file.
RubyCritic subagent (if accepted):
Read the file agents/rubycritic_agent.md and follow all steps described in it. The audit scope is: {{SCOPE from Step 1}}. Return the code quality data in the output format specified in that file.
After both agents finish, clean up:
- If SimpleCov ran:
rm -rf coverage/
- If RubyCritic ran:
rm -rf tmp/rubycritic/
Interpreting responses:
COVERAGE_FAILED / RUBYCRITIC_FAILED: no data for that tool — use estimation mode (SimpleCov) or omit the section (RubyCritic). Note the failure reason in the report.
COVERAGE_DATA: parse and keep in context for Steps 4 and 5 (overall coverage, per-directory breakdowns, lowest-coverage files, zero-coverage files).
RUBYCRITIC_DATA: parse and keep in context for Steps 4 and 5 (overall score, per-directory ratings, worst-rated files, top smells, most complex files).
Step 3: Load Reference Materials
Before analyzing, read the relevant reference files:
references/code_smells.md - Code smell patterns to identify
references/testing_guidelines.md - Testing best practices
references/poro_patterns.md - PORO and ActiveModel patterns
references/security_checklist.md - Security vulnerability patterns
references/rails_antipatterns.md - Rails-specific antipatterns (external services, migrations, performance)
Step 4: Analyze Code by Category
All analysis must stay within the project root and the bundle path. To inspect gem source, use bundle show <gem> to locate it (see "Locate gem source" under Analysis Commands) — never run filesystem-wide searches like find /. If you delegate any category below to subagents, include this constraint in each subagent's prompt.
Analyze in this order:
Testing Coverage & Quality
- If SimpleCov data was collected in Step 2, use actual coverage percentages instead of estimates
- Cross-reference per-file SimpleCov data: files with 0% coverage = "missing tests"
- Check for missing test files
- Identify untested public methods
- Review test structure (Four Phase Test)
- Check for testing antipatterns
Security Vulnerabilities
- SQL injection risks
- Mass assignment vulnerabilities
- XSS vulnerabilities
- Authentication/authorization issues
- Sensitive data exposure
Models & Database
- Fat model detection
- Missing validations
- N+1 query risks
- Callback complexity
- Law of Demeter violations (voyeuristic models)
- If RubyCritic data was collected, flag models with D/F ratings or high complexity
Controllers
- Fat controller detection
- Business logic in controllers
- Missing strong parameters
- Response handling
- Monolithic controllers (non-RESTful actions, > 7 actions)
- Bloated sessions (storing objects instead of IDs)
- If RubyCritic data was collected, flag controllers with D/F ratings or high complexity
Code Design & Architecture
- Service Objects → recommend PORO refactoring
- Large classes
- Long methods
- Feature envy
- Law of Demeter violations
- Single Responsibility violations
- If RubyCritic data was collected, cross-reference D/F rated files and high-complexity files with manual code review findings
Views & Presenters
- Logic in views (PHPitis)
- Missing partials for DRY
- Helper complexity
- Query logic in views
External Services & Error Handling
- Fire and forget (missing exception handling for HTTP calls)
- Sluggish services (missing timeouts, synchronous calls that should be backgrounded)
- Bare rescue statements
- Silent failures (save without checking return value)
Database & Migrations
- Messy migrations (model references, missing down methods)
- Missing indexes on foreign keys, polymorphic associations, uniqueness validations
- Performance antipatterns (Ruby iteration vs SQL queries)
- Bulk operations without transactions
Step 5: Generate Audit Report
Create RAILS_AUDIT_REPORT.md in project root with structure defined in references/report_template.md.
When SimpleCov coverage data was collected in Step 2, use the SimpleCov variant of the Testing section in the report template. When coverage data is not available, use the estimation variant.
When RubyCritic data was collected in Step 2b, include the Code Quality Metrics section in the report using the RubyCritic variant from the report template. When RubyCritic data is not available, use the not available variant.
Severity Definitions
- Critical: Security vulnerabilities, data loss risks, production-breaking issues
- High: Performance issues, missing tests for critical paths, major code smells
- Medium: Code smells, convention violations, maintainability concerns
- Low: Style issues, minor improvements, suggestions
Key Detection Patterns
Service Object → PORO Refactoring
When you find classes in app/services/:
- Classes named
*Service, *Manager, *Handler
- Classes with only
.call or .perform methods
- Recommend: Rename to domain nouns, include
ActiveModel::Model
Fat Model Detection
Models with:
- More than 200 lines
- More than 15 public methods
- Multiple unrelated responsibilities
- Recommend: Extract to POROs using composition
Fat Controller Detection
Controllers with:
- Actions over 15 lines
- Business logic (not request/response handling)
- Multiple instance variable assignments
- Recommend: Extract to form objects or domain models
Missing Test Detection
For each Ruby file in app/:
- Check for corresponding
_spec.rb or _test.rb
- Check for tested public methods
- Report untested files and methods
Analysis Commands
Use Claude Code's built-in tools instead of shell commands — they're faster, handle permissions correctly, and give better output:
- Find Ruby files by type: Use the Glob tool with patterns like
app/models/**/*.rb, app/controllers/**/*.rb, app/services/**/*.rb
- Find test files: Use Glob with
spec/**/*_spec.rb or test/**/*_test.rb
- Search for patterns in code: Use the Grep tool (e.g., search for
rescue\s*$, \.save\b, params\.permit!)
- Read and count lines in files: Use the Read tool to inspect files; count lines from the output
- Find long files: Use Glob to list all
app/**/*.rb files, then Read each to check line count
- Locate gem source: When analysis requires reading gem-provided code (e.g., a base controller or concern from an engine like Devise, Administrate, or Madmin), use
bundle show <gem> (or bundle exec gem which <gem>/<path>) to find the installed gem's directory, then Read/Grep within it. Never search outside the project root and the bundle path — no find / or home-directory-wide globs.
Report Output
Always save the audit report to RAILS_AUDIT_REPORT.md in the project root and present it to the user.
1---2name: rails-audit-thoughtbot3description: Perform comprehensive code audits of Ruby on Rails applications based on thoughtbot best practices. Use this skill when the user requests a code audit, code review, quality assessment, or analysis of a Rails application. The skill analyzes the entire codebase focusing on testing practices (RSpec), security vulnerabilities, code design (skinny controllers, domain models, PORO with ActiveModel), Rails conventions, database optimization, and Ruby best practices. Outputs a detailed markdown audit report grouped by category (Testing, Security, Models, Controllers, Code Design, Views) with severity levels (Critical, High, Medium, Low) within each category.4---56# Rails Audit Skill (thoughtbot Best Practices)78Perform comprehensive Ruby on Rails application audits based on thoughtbot's Ruby Science and Testing Rails best practices, with emphasis on Plain Old Ruby Objects (POROs) over Service Objects.910## Audit Scope1112The audit can be run in two modes:131. **Full Application Audit**: Analyze entire Rails application142. **Targeted Audit**: Analyze specific files or directories1516## Execution Flow1718### Step 1: Determine Audit Scope1920Ask user or infer from request:21- Full audit: Analyze all of `app/`, `spec/` or `test/`, `config/`, `db/`, `lib/`22- Targeted audit: Analyze specified paths only2324### Step 2: Collect Optional Metrics (SimpleCov + RubyCritic)2526Ask the user **both questions upfront** in a single `AskUserQuestion` so they can decide once:27- **Question**: "Before starting the audit, would you like to collect automated metrics?\n\n1. **SimpleCov** — runs your test suite to capture actual code coverage percentages\n2. **RubyCritic** — analyzes code complexity, duplication, and smells (does not run tests)\n\nBoth are recommended for the most thorough audit."28- **Options**: "Yes to both (Recommended)" / "SimpleCov only" / "RubyCritic only" / "Skip both"2930Based on the user's choice, spawn the accepted subagents **in parallel** using the Task tool. Both can run at the same time because SimpleCov modifies the test helper while RubyCritic only reads source files — they don't conflict.3132**SimpleCov subagent** (if accepted):3334> Read the file `agents/simplecov_agent.md` and follow all steps described in it. The audit scope is: {{SCOPE from Step 1}}. Return the coverage data in the output format specified in that file.3536**RubyCritic subagent** (if accepted):3738> Read the file `agents/rubycritic_agent.md` and follow all steps described in it. The audit scope is: {{SCOPE from Step 1}}. Return the code quality data in the output format specified in that file.3940**After both agents finish**, clean up:41- If SimpleCov ran: `rm -rf coverage/`42- If RubyCritic ran: `rm -rf tmp/rubycritic/`4344**Interpreting responses:**45- `COVERAGE_FAILED` / `RUBYCRITIC_FAILED`: no data for that tool — use estimation mode (SimpleCov) or omit the section (RubyCritic). Note the failure reason in the report.46- `COVERAGE_DATA`: parse and keep in context for Steps 4 and 5 (overall coverage, per-directory breakdowns, lowest-coverage files, zero-coverage files).47- `RUBYCRITIC_DATA`: parse and keep in context for Steps 4 and 5 (overall score, per-directory ratings, worst-rated files, top smells, most complex files).4849### Step 3: Load Reference Materials5051Before analyzing, read the relevant reference files:52- `references/code_smells.md` - Code smell patterns to identify53- `references/testing_guidelines.md` - Testing best practices54- `references/poro_patterns.md` - PORO and ActiveModel patterns55- `references/security_checklist.md` - Security vulnerability patterns56- `references/rails_antipatterns.md` - Rails-specific antipatterns (external services, migrations, performance)5758### Step 4: Analyze Code by Category5960All analysis must stay within the project root and the bundle path. To inspect gem source, use `bundle show <gem>` to locate it (see "Locate gem source" under Analysis Commands) — never run filesystem-wide searches like `find /`. If you delegate any category below to subagents, include this constraint in each subagent's prompt.6162Analyze in this order:63641. **Testing Coverage & Quality**65 - If SimpleCov data was collected in Step 2, use actual coverage percentages instead of estimates66 - Cross-reference per-file SimpleCov data: files with 0% coverage = "missing tests"67 - Check for missing test files68 - Identify untested public methods69 - Review test structure (Four Phase Test)70 - Check for testing antipatterns71722. **Security Vulnerabilities**73 - SQL injection risks74 - Mass assignment vulnerabilities75 - XSS vulnerabilities76 - Authentication/authorization issues77 - Sensitive data exposure78793. **Models & Database**80 - Fat model detection81 - Missing validations82 - N+1 query risks83 - Callback complexity84 - Law of Demeter violations (voyeuristic models)85 - If RubyCritic data was collected, flag models with D/F ratings or high complexity86874. **Controllers**88 - Fat controller detection89 - Business logic in controllers90 - Missing strong parameters91 - Response handling92 - Monolithic controllers (non-RESTful actions, > 7 actions)93 - Bloated sessions (storing objects instead of IDs)94 - If RubyCritic data was collected, flag controllers with D/F ratings or high complexity95965. **Code Design & Architecture**97 - Service Objects → recommend PORO refactoring98 - Large classes99 - Long methods100 - Feature envy101 - Law of Demeter violations102 - Single Responsibility violations103 - If RubyCritic data was collected, cross-reference D/F rated files and high-complexity files with manual code review findings1041056. **Views & Presenters**106 - Logic in views (PHPitis)107 - Missing partials for DRY108 - Helper complexity109 - Query logic in views1101117. **External Services & Error Handling**112 - Fire and forget (missing exception handling for HTTP calls)113 - Sluggish services (missing timeouts, synchronous calls that should be backgrounded)114 - Bare rescue statements115 - Silent failures (save without checking return value)1161178. **Database & Migrations**118 - Messy migrations (model references, missing down methods)119 - Missing indexes on foreign keys, polymorphic associations, uniqueness validations120 - Performance antipatterns (Ruby iteration vs SQL queries)121 - Bulk operations without transactions122123### Step 5: Generate Audit Report124125Create `RAILS_AUDIT_REPORT.md` in project root with structure defined in `references/report_template.md`.126127When SimpleCov coverage data was collected in Step 2, use the **SimpleCov variant** of the Testing section in the report template. When coverage data is not available, use the **estimation variant**.128129When RubyCritic data was collected in Step 2b, include the **Code Quality Metrics** section in the report using the RubyCritic variant from the report template. When RubyCritic data is not available, use the **not available variant**.130131## Severity Definitions132133- **Critical**: Security vulnerabilities, data loss risks, production-breaking issues134- **High**: Performance issues, missing tests for critical paths, major code smells135- **Medium**: Code smells, convention violations, maintainability concerns136- **Low**: Style issues, minor improvements, suggestions137138## Key Detection Patterns139140### Service Object → PORO Refactoring141142When you find classes in `app/services/`:143- Classes named `*Service`, `*Manager`, `*Handler`144- Classes with only `.call` or `.perform` methods145- Recommend: Rename to domain nouns, include `ActiveModel::Model`146147### Fat Model Detection148149Models with:150- More than 200 lines151- More than 15 public methods152- Multiple unrelated responsibilities153- Recommend: Extract to POROs using composition154155### Fat Controller Detection156157Controllers with:158- Actions over 15 lines159- Business logic (not request/response handling)160- Multiple instance variable assignments161- Recommend: Extract to form objects or domain models162163### Missing Test Detection164165For each Ruby file in `app/`:166- Check for corresponding `_spec.rb` or `_test.rb`167- Check for tested public methods168- Report untested files and methods169170## Analysis Commands171172Use Claude Code's built-in tools instead of shell commands — they're faster, handle permissions correctly, and give better output:173174- **Find Ruby files by type**: Use the Glob tool with patterns like `app/models/**/*.rb`, `app/controllers/**/*.rb`, `app/services/**/*.rb`175- **Find test files**: Use Glob with `spec/**/*_spec.rb` or `test/**/*_test.rb`176- **Search for patterns in code**: Use the Grep tool (e.g., search for `rescue\s*$`, `\.save\b`, `params\.permit!`)177- **Read and count lines in files**: Use the Read tool to inspect files; count lines from the output178- **Find long files**: Use Glob to list all `app/**/*.rb` files, then Read each to check line count179- **Locate gem source**: When analysis requires reading gem-provided code (e.g., a base controller or concern from an engine like Devise, Administrate, or Madmin), use `bundle show <gem>` (or `bundle exec gem which <gem>/<path>`) to find the installed gem's directory, then Read/Grep within it. Never search outside the project root and the bundle path — no `find /` or home-directory-wide globs.180181## Report Output182183Always save the audit report to `RAILS_AUDIT_REPORT.md` in the project root and present it to the user.