Evaluate RAG

Evaluate RAG

Purpose

Help agents evaluate retrieval-augmented generation systems by separating retrieval quality from generation quality. This skill covers retrieval eval datasets, Recall@k, reranking metrics, chunking experiments, faithfulness, relevance, and training-data leakage checks.

Quick Start

1. Do trace-level error analysis before selecting metrics.
2. Build query-to-relevant-chunk datasets for retrieval.
3. Optimize first-pass retrieval for recall.
4. Evaluate generation separately for faithfulness and relevance.
5. Grid-search chunking before tuning generation when retrieval is weak.

Operating Constraints

• Do not rely on one end-to-end score.
• Do not tune generation before checking whether the needed context was retrieved.
• Use Recall@k for first-pass retrieval and precision, MRR, or NDCG for reranking as appropriate.
• Treat synthetic questions as useful but not sufficient without realism filtering.
• Check train/eval leakage when RAG traces become training data.

Inputs This Skill Expects

• RAG traces showing query, retrieved chunks, context, and answer.
• Corpus chunks, chunking strategy, retriever, reranker, and prompt.
• Retrieval eval dataset or source documents from which to build one.
• Generation eval criteria such as grounding, relevance, citation support, and omissions.

Output Contract

• State whether failures come from retrieval, generation, or both.
• Provide retrieval metrics and generation findings separately.
• Recommend chunking, embedding, reranking, prompt, or generation changes based on the diagnosed failure.
• Include leakage and source-alignment checks if traces become training rows.

Procedure

1. Inspect failed traces and classify retrieval versus generation failures.
2. Build or review query-to-relevant-chunk labels.
3. Measure first-pass retrieval and reranking separately.
4. Test chunk size, overlap, and content-aware chunking when retrieval is weak.
5. Evaluate generated answers for faithfulness, relevance, omissions, and hallucinations.
6. If converting traces to training rows, audit final serialized rows for leakage, citation/source alignment, prompt residue, and malformed text.

Pitfalls And Gotchas

• Using similarity metrics as primary answer-quality measures.
• Overfitting to synthetic retrieval questions.
• Ignoring multi-hop queries that need multiple chunks.
• Treating reranker precision as a fix when first-pass recall is too low.
• Training on RAG traces without checking final assistant text quality.

Progressive Disclosure

Start with trace inspection and retrieval/generation separation. Expand into synthetic QA, adversarial retrieval, chunking grid search, reranking, multi-hop metrics, or training-data audits only when the problem requires it.

Verification Pattern

• Confirm traces were inspected before metrics were chosen.
• Confirm retrieval and generation are measured separately.
• Confirm first-pass retrieval recall is adequate before generation tuning.
• Confirm chunking changes are evaluated against a labeled retrieval set.
• Confirm RAG-derived training rows are checked for leakage and source alignment.