Consult Consistency Lint

Consult Consistency Lint -- Cross-Artifact Diff

Flag inconsistencies: text vs diagram, missing acceptance for a phase, duplicated/conflicting scope, option drift.

Inputs

Workflow

1. Phase coverage -- every phase in gates has exactly one acceptance row; flag orphans either direction.
2. Option alignment -- MVP/Pilot/Full names and definitions match across arc, gates, commercial; flag renamed or missing options.
3. Scope strings -- in/out scope in frame must not reappear as promised deliverables unless explicitly in acceptance; flag contradictions.
4. Decision thread -- arc "thread" sentence must match frame primary decision; flag mismatch.
5. Diagram vs text -- for each box/layer in the architecture artifact, map to a noun in arc or acceptance; unmapped diagram elements or unmapped promises in text get FINDING.
6. Commercial vs gates -- durations/options must reference the same phased path; flag phases with no timebox or timebox with no phase.
7. Placeholder scan -- TBD, TODO, unknown -- confirm, lorem, angle brackets; list file/section if known from paste titles.

Output -- exactly this shape

## Lint -- <client or "TBD"> -- <YYYY-MM-DD>

**Summary**
- Critical: <n>
- Warning: <n>

**Findings**
| ID | Severity | Where | Issue | Suggested fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | critical | ... | ... | ... |

**Clean checks passed**
- <bullet list of checks that passed>

Severity: critical = would embarrass in client readout or breaks contract intent; warning = clarity or internal consistency.

Rules

• Do not invent architecture elements -- if no diagram supplied, skip diagram checks and note skipped -- no architecture artifact.
• If an input artifact is missing, list as missing -- <skill name> and skip dependent checks.
• Suggested fix is one line each; no full rewrites.

Common failure modes