Skill Researcher
Your job is to identify which skill is most useful for the project before diving into implementation.
Outcome
Produce a recommendation that is:
- grounded in the actual repo
- focused on the current task, not just the tech stack
- honest about confidence
- specific about why the chosen skill beats nearby alternatives
Workflow
1) Scope the project correctly
Start from the user's real working scope.
- If the user points to a file, folder, package, or service, prioritize that area over the repo root.
- If this is a monorepo, determine which package or app the request is really about.
- If the user gave a task such as "improve the UI", "add Anthropic support", or "write docs", treat the task as a first-class signal alongside the stack.
Never recommend a skill from the repo root alone when the user is clearly working in a subproject.
2) Get a quick repo summary first
If the brief CLI is available, use it near the start to get a fast snapshot of the repository.
- Treat
brief as an orientation tool, not as the final source of truth.
- Use it to spot likely apps, packages, frameworks, and docs before deeper inspection.
- Verify any important claims against actual files in the repo.
If brief is unavailable or low-signal for the current scope, skip it and inspect the repo directly.
3) Inspect high-signal files first
Prefer fast, read-only inspection. Start with the smallest set of files that gives a reliable picture.
Look for these first:
package.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, yarn.lock, package-lock.json
pyproject.toml, requirements*.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock
Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock
go.mod
Gemfile, Gemfile.lock
pom.xml, build.gradle, settings.gradle
*.csproj, Directory.Build.props
Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml
Makefile, justfile, Taskfile.yml
tsconfig.json, vite.config.*, next.config.*, nuxt.config.*, astro.config.*, svelte.config.*, angular.json
- framework entry points such as
manage.py, asgi.py, wsgi.py, main.py, app.py, src/main.*
README*, docs/, CI workflows, and top-level architecture notes
Read more only when the project appears mixed or ambiguous.
4) Infer the dominant stack
Summarize only major signals:
- primary language(s)
- primary runtime or framework
- central SDKs or platforms
- testing, build, or deployment tools when they clearly shape the workflow
- special domains such as frontend design, documentation, PDFs, AI integration, MCP, security review, or data workflows
Use these rules:
- framework beats utility library
- app-defining config beats one incidental import
- repeated evidence beats a single mention
- lockfiles prove presence; config files and entry points prove centrality
- ignore transitive or incidental packages unless they directly drive the user's task
Good major-signal examples:
next, react, vite, astro
fastapi, django, flask
@anthropic-ai/sdk, anthropic
- MCP SDKs, MCP server structure, or MCP-specific docs
- docs/spec-heavy repo structure
- clear document/PDF processing workflows
Weak signals that usually should not drive the recommendation by themselves:
lodash, chalk, requests, axios, date-fns, zod unless the current task is specifically about them
5) Search for candidate skills
Search available skills using both exact stack terms and task-oriented terms.
Search in this order:
- locally installed or user-provided skills
- locally synced skills managed by Kasetto when that workflow exists
- official or default skill collections available in the environment
- broader skill sources the user expects you to consider
When Kasetto is in play:
- check
kasetto.yaml or the relevant Kasetto config path to understand which skill sources are synced locally
- treat Kasetto as the local sync mechanism and use the Kasetto-managed copy as the local source of truth when relevant
- prefer the locally synced copy when the environment uses Kasetto for skill distribution
- mention Kasetto when it affects where the recommended skill should be loaded from or updated
Use multiple search patterns:
- exact framework:
Next.js skill
- exact SDK or platform:
Anthropic SDK skill, MCP skill
- task + framework:
frontend design React skill, documentation spec writing skill
- ecosystem synonyms:
TypeScript UI skill, Python API skill
- fallback category search when exact terms fail
Read the actual description of the top candidate skills before recommending one. Do not recommend from a skill name alone.
Do not invent skill names. If a search does not surface a real skill, say you did not find a strong specialized match.
6) Rank candidates
Choose the skill that best matches both:
- what the project is
- what the user is trying to do now
Use this ranking logic:
- Strong match: the skill description explicitly fits the task and the stack
- Good match: strong domain fit with compatible stack, even if not framework-specific
- Fallback: useful general skill, but not tightly aligned
- No strong match: no available skill clearly beats generic help
Prefer the narrowest skill that clearly fits. Do not choose a general language skill over a skill whose description directly matches the user's task.
When two skills overlap:
- pick one primary skill
- include the second as a runner-up
- explain the boundary between them
7) Return a concise recommendation
Always use this structure:
Stack snapshot
- Scope:
- Languages:
- Frameworks/platforms:
- Major packages/SDKs:
- Current task:
- Confidence:
Best skill
- Skill:
- Why it fits:
- Repo evidence:
- Why it beats nearby alternatives:
Runner-ups
- Skill: reason it was close but not the best
- Skill: reason it was close but not the best
Gaps or uncertainties
- Missing evidence or ambiguity that affected confidence
Keep this short and evidence-based. The goal is to help the agent or user move quickly into the right specialized workflow.
Special cases
Monorepos
Recommend per target package or app, not per repository brand.
A monorepo may justify one skill for apps/web and another for an mcp-server package.
Multi-domain work
If the user's task crosses domains, choose the primary skill for the first blocking step.
For example, if the repo uses the Anthropic SDK and the user wants to improve the product UI, a frontend skill may be the primary recommendation for that request, while an Anthropic skill is only secondary context.
No strong match
Say so plainly. Name the closest one or two options and why they are only partial fits.
Trust and source quality
Prefer official or already-installed skills over loosely matched third-party skills unless the user explicitly wants community options.
Practical heuristics
- Package manifests and framework config files are more informative than lockfiles alone.
- Entry-point imports can resolve ties when configs are ambiguous.
- README language can help identify the project's real purpose.
- The user's requested change outweighs background tech that is unrelated to the task.
- A repo can contain React without needing a frontend skill for a backend-only request.
Examples
Example 1: Anthropic integration
Project signals:
package.json includes @anthropic-ai/sdk
- source files import
Anthropic
- task:
add prompt caching
Recommendation:
- Primary:
claude-api
- Why: the project and task are directly about Anthropic SDK usage
Example 2: MCP server
Project signals:
- MCP server structure or MCP SDK dependency
- task:
build a tool server for GitHub
Recommendation:
- Primary:
mcp-builder
- Why: the task is explicitly about building an MCP server
Example 3: UI-heavy web app
Project signals:
next.config.*, react, tailwindcss
- task:
make the dashboard feel polished and less generic
Recommendation:
- Primary:
frontend-design
- Why: the user's job-to-be-done is interface quality, not generic TypeScript coding
Example 4: Documentation-centered work
Project signals:
- docs-heavy repo, ADRs, specs, or proposals
- task:
turn notes into a technical design doc
Recommendation:
- Primary:
doc-coauthoring
- Why: the task is structured documentation, even if the repo also contains code
Avoid these mistakes
- Do not recommend based on a single flashy dependency.
- Do not list every package; summarize only the few that matter.
- Do not confuse the package manager with the framework.
- Do not ignore subdirectory scope in a monorepo.
- Do not pretend confidence is high when the repo evidence is thin.
- Do not force a specialized skill when no clear match exists.
Source: aaronflorey/agent-skills — distributed by TomeVault.
1---2name: aaronflorey-agent-skills-skill-researcher3description: Skill Researcher4---56# Skill Researcher78Your job is to identify which skill is most useful for the project **before** diving into implementation.910## Outcome11Produce a recommendation that is:121. grounded in the actual repo132. focused on the current task, not just the tech stack143. honest about confidence154. specific about why the chosen skill beats nearby alternatives1617## Workflow1819### 1) Scope the project correctly20Start from the user's real working scope.21- If the user points to a file, folder, package, or service, prioritize that area over the repo root.22- If this is a monorepo, determine which package or app the request is really about.23- If the user gave a task such as "improve the UI", "add Anthropic support", or "write docs", treat the task as a first-class signal alongside the stack.2425Never recommend a skill from the repo root alone when the user is clearly working in a subproject.2627### 2) Get a quick repo summary first28If the `brief` CLI is available, use it near the start to get a fast snapshot of the repository.2930- Treat `brief` as an orientation tool, not as the final source of truth.31- Use it to spot likely apps, packages, frameworks, and docs before deeper inspection.32- Verify any important claims against actual files in the repo.3334If `brief` is unavailable or low-signal for the current scope, skip it and inspect the repo directly.3536### 3) Inspect high-signal files first37Prefer fast, read-only inspection. Start with the smallest set of files that gives a reliable picture.3839Look for these first:40- `package.json`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`, `yarn.lock`, `package-lock.json`41- `pyproject.toml`, `requirements*.txt`, `poetry.lock`, `uv.lock`42- `Cargo.toml`, `Cargo.lock`43- `go.mod`44- `Gemfile`, `Gemfile.lock`45- `pom.xml`, `build.gradle`, `settings.gradle`46- `*.csproj`, `Directory.Build.props`47- `Dockerfile`, `docker-compose.yml`48- `Makefile`, `justfile`, `Taskfile.yml`49- `tsconfig.json`, `vite.config.*`, `next.config.*`, `nuxt.config.*`, `astro.config.*`, `svelte.config.*`, `angular.json`50- framework entry points such as `manage.py`, `asgi.py`, `wsgi.py`, `main.py`, `app.py`, `src/main.*`51- `README*`, `docs/`, CI workflows, and top-level architecture notes5253Read more only when the project appears mixed or ambiguous.5455### 4) Infer the dominant stack56Summarize only major signals:57- primary language(s)58- primary runtime or framework59- central SDKs or platforms60- testing, build, or deployment tools when they clearly shape the workflow61- special domains such as frontend design, documentation, PDFs, AI integration, MCP, security review, or data workflows6263Use these rules:64- framework beats utility library65- app-defining config beats one incidental import66- repeated evidence beats a single mention67- lockfiles prove presence; config files and entry points prove centrality68- ignore transitive or incidental packages unless they directly drive the user's task6970Good major-signal examples:71- `next`, `react`, `vite`, `astro`72- `fastapi`, `django`, `flask`73- `@anthropic-ai/sdk`, `anthropic`74- MCP SDKs, MCP server structure, or MCP-specific docs75- docs/spec-heavy repo structure76- clear document/PDF processing workflows7778Weak signals that usually should not drive the recommendation by themselves:79- `lodash`, `chalk`, `requests`, `axios`, `date-fns`, `zod` unless the current task is specifically about them8081### 5) Search for candidate skills82Search available skills using both exact stack terms and task-oriented terms.8384Search in this order:851. locally installed or user-provided skills862. locally synced skills managed by Kasetto when that workflow exists873. official or default skill collections available in the environment884. broader skill sources the user expects you to consider8990When Kasetto is in play:91- check `kasetto.yaml` or the relevant Kasetto config path to understand which skill sources are synced locally92- treat Kasetto as the local sync mechanism and use the Kasetto-managed copy as the local source of truth when relevant93- prefer the locally synced copy when the environment uses Kasetto for skill distribution94- mention Kasetto when it affects where the recommended skill should be loaded from or updated9596Use multiple search patterns:97- exact framework: `Next.js skill`98- exact SDK or platform: `Anthropic SDK skill`, `MCP skill`99- task + framework: `frontend design React skill`, `documentation spec writing skill`100- ecosystem synonyms: `TypeScript UI skill`, `Python API skill`101- fallback category search when exact terms fail102103Read the actual description of the top candidate skills before recommending one. Do not recommend from a skill name alone.104105Do not invent skill names. If a search does not surface a real skill, say you did not find a strong specialized match.106107### 6) Rank candidates108Choose the skill that best matches both:109- what the project is110- what the user is trying to do now111112Use this ranking logic:113- **Strong match**: the skill description explicitly fits the task and the stack114- **Good match**: strong domain fit with compatible stack, even if not framework-specific115- **Fallback**: useful general skill, but not tightly aligned116- **No strong match**: no available skill clearly beats generic help117118Prefer the narrowest skill that clearly fits. Do not choose a general language skill over a skill whose description directly matches the user's task.119120When two skills overlap:121- pick one primary skill122- include the second as a runner-up123- explain the boundary between them124125### 7) Return a concise recommendation126Always use this structure:127128## Stack snapshot129- Scope:130- Languages:131- Frameworks/platforms:132- Major packages/SDKs:133- Current task:134- Confidence:135136## Best skill137- Skill:138- Why it fits:139- Repo evidence:140- Why it beats nearby alternatives:141142## Runner-ups143- Skill: reason it was close but not the best144- Skill: reason it was close but not the best145146## Gaps or uncertainties147- Missing evidence or ambiguity that affected confidence148149Keep this short and evidence-based. The goal is to help the agent or user move quickly into the right specialized workflow.150151## Special cases152153### Monorepos154Recommend per target package or app, not per repository brand.155A monorepo may justify one skill for `apps/web` and another for an `mcp-server` package.156157### Multi-domain work158If the user's task crosses domains, choose the primary skill for the first blocking step.159For example, if the repo uses the Anthropic SDK and the user wants to improve the product UI, a frontend skill may be the primary recommendation for that request, while an Anthropic skill is only secondary context.160161### No strong match162Say so plainly. Name the closest one or two options and why they are only partial fits.163164### Trust and source quality165Prefer official or already-installed skills over loosely matched third-party skills unless the user explicitly wants community options.166167## Practical heuristics168- Package manifests and framework config files are more informative than lockfiles alone.169- Entry-point imports can resolve ties when configs are ambiguous.170- README language can help identify the project's real purpose.171- The user's requested change outweighs background tech that is unrelated to the task.172- A repo can contain React without needing a frontend skill for a backend-only request.173174## Examples175176**Example 1: Anthropic integration**177Project signals:178- `package.json` includes `@anthropic-ai/sdk`179- source files import `Anthropic`180- task: `add prompt caching`181182Recommendation:183- Primary: `claude-api`184- Why: the project and task are directly about Anthropic SDK usage185186**Example 2: MCP server**187Project signals:188- MCP server structure or MCP SDK dependency189- task: `build a tool server for GitHub`190191Recommendation:192- Primary: `mcp-builder`193- Why: the task is explicitly about building an MCP server194195**Example 3: UI-heavy web app**196Project signals:197- `next.config.*`, `react`, `tailwindcss`198- task: `make the dashboard feel polished and less generic`199200Recommendation:201- Primary: `frontend-design`202- Why: the user's job-to-be-done is interface quality, not generic TypeScript coding203204**Example 4: Documentation-centered work**205Project signals:206- docs-heavy repo, ADRs, specs, or proposals207- task: `turn notes into a technical design doc`208209Recommendation:210- Primary: `doc-coauthoring`211- Why: the task is structured documentation, even if the repo also contains code212213## Avoid these mistakes214- Do not recommend based on a single flashy dependency.215- Do not list every package; summarize only the few that matter.216- Do not confuse the package manager with the framework.217- Do not ignore subdirectory scope in a monorepo.218- Do not pretend confidence is high when the repo evidence is thin.219- Do not force a specialized skill when no clear match exists.220221---222> Source: [aaronflorey/agent-skills](https://github.com/aaronflorey/agent-skills) — distributed by [TomeVault](https://tomevault.io).223<!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-04-29 -->