Are Plan

Compare AI planning quality with and without ARE documentation.

Steps

1. Read version: Read .claude/ARE-VERSION → store as $VERSION. Show the user: agents-reverse-engineer v$VERSION

2. Run the plan command:

   npx agents-reverse-engineer@$VERSION plan --backend claude $ARGUMENTS
   

3. Wait for completion — the command runs two sequential AI planning sessions (without docs, then with docs) and outputs a comparison table.

4. On completion, summarize the comparison results:

   • Quantitative metrics (file references, actionable steps, code identifiers)
   • Cost and latency comparison
   • Quality evaluation scores (if --eval was used)

This creates two git branches from HEAD and runs an AI planner in each:

• With ARE docs: Full documentation available
• Without ARE docs: Source code only (ARE artifacts stripped)

The comparison measures how much ARE documentation improves AI planning quality.

Options:

• --eval: Run AI quality evaluator on both plans (5-point rubric)
• --eval-model <name>: Model for the evaluator (default: same as --model)
• --model <name>: AI model to use for planning
• --dry-run: Show what would happen without executing
• --list: List all saved plan comparisons
• --show <id>: View a previous comparison by date
• --force: Overwrite existing branches for the same task
• --debug: Show verbose AI execution details

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.